Do you spend more if the individual dances cost less?
wwpmi
The discussion on "Making it rain" got me thinking. I spend two to three times more money in a club that has dances from $5 (Atlanta) or $10 (cocoa beach) or two for one on special times or days (detroit) then bars that charge $25 to $40. I wonder if I am "odd man out" or if this is typical and if it is typical it would seem more bars would get on board with a lower cost high volume pricing structure.
31 comments
Dancers dont need to be charging $40-$60 per song for this type of dance. They would be making more if they charge less. Customers want to know they are getting a good deal. Dancers just need to do their part on executing their talents and customers like me would extend the session and spend more instead of buying just one $40-$60 dance or none at all.
down here, you have to spend at least $60 which gets you a 2 for 1, if you want a decent lap dance. (where you can actually touch and there's something contact)
$20 in my area, only gets you an air dance, where you can't touch the dancer at all, that is very lame and not even worth the money.
I will happily spend a couple of k at that joint under those circumstances.
I'm agree inno123, I have a fixed amount in my wallet and I'm not going to spend more than that.
TOUCHE!!!
I remember one trip a year ago the club was partially dead (around 2am). Very few people were getting dances at the time. I had been there for hours so I spent my budget and planned on leaving after getting one more dance from my fave. This blonde came up while I was waiting for the other girl and when I said I'm waiting on someone, she haggled me on a price and said 6 for $50. She knew that in the time it took to do six dances she would make a guaranteed $50 while the rest of the girls were just walking around a dead room. I gave in. Might not seem like she got much out of the deal, but I'm sure it was better than sitting in the locker room for three songs because no one was getting dances.