Review Standards
rickdugan
Verified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
Saturday, August 20, 2011 6:11 AM
For the most part, I think that the reviews are better here than anywhere else, but of course some obvious shill reviews do slip through. I think that the flag feature was a great addition and is hopefully helping with this issue. One thing, however, that continues to irk me are the "drive-by" reviews, including some posted by some people with fairly serious review counts.
So-called "drive-by" reviews are those that provide very little information about the club, girls or visit in general and are usually no longer than a single paragraph. When I see these types of reviews, it is usually pretty clear that the reviewer either (1) was not in the club very long and is probably posting primarily to keep VIP status; or (2) just too lazy to give a proper review.
Maybe I am a bit of an idealist, but if I cannot give a fairly full review of a club then I do not bother. As an example, during my last trip to Atlanta I visited Follies but, since I was only in there for an hour and only talked with one girl, did not review the club as I simply did not have enough intel to provide a good information. Now I am not saying that every review that I post is spectacular, but I do try to maintain a certain minimum standard and if I am not in the club for at least a couple of hours, with interactions with at least a few girls, then I do not believe that I have enough material to do a proper job of it.
Over time I have learned to skim by the obvious crap reviews, but I tend to stop when I see reviewers with decent review counts. Unfortunately, some of those reviewers with decent counts have accumulated those numbers by posting a series of junkie reviews that provide little substance.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
32 comments