Strip club permissiveness
georgmicrodong
Just a fat, creepy old pervert.
So I've seen several comments from time to time concerning the progression of permissiveness in strip clubs over the years. Many say that the level of service we enjoy today is a relatively recent manifestation and that it used to be much harder to find actual sex in a strip club, or even the high mileage touching with which some seem satisfied.
Based on my own experience, I really have to wonder if that is, in fact, the case. My very first visit to a strip club involved full sex, and since that time, while there have been ups and downs based on location, overall, that level of service hasn't changed much for me over the years, other than by choice.
Admittedly, my first experience was in Fort Erie, Canada, and I don't recall that prostitution was any more illegal in Canada at that time than it is now (though I'm reasonably certain that serving a 17 year old that much booze was). However, I also never had a problem finding it in at least some of the clubs in Western NY, later in the other places I've lived, and of course now in Louisville.
Given my experience, I think that *actual* issue is that, instead of sexual services actually being more available now than they were then, it is really the patrons' perceptions that have progressed. I believe sex was just as available then as it is now, but most people aren't *aware* of that availability until they've been going to strip clubs for a number of years.
To be fair, I also believe that sites like TUSCL, and the internet in general, make it much easier to *find* where sex might be had, but again, that's a perception issue, not one of actual availability. People just getting started in the strip club hobby have a much easier time finding out both generalities and specifics, whereas when I, and I presume many others, started, it was a matter of canvasing the actual clubs and spending time feeling things out. Again though, that doesn't mean it wasn't *available*, just that it was more time consuming to find.
Thoughts?
Based on my own experience, I really have to wonder if that is, in fact, the case. My very first visit to a strip club involved full sex, and since that time, while there have been ups and downs based on location, overall, that level of service hasn't changed much for me over the years, other than by choice.
Admittedly, my first experience was in Fort Erie, Canada, and I don't recall that prostitution was any more illegal in Canada at that time than it is now (though I'm reasonably certain that serving a 17 year old that much booze was). However, I also never had a problem finding it in at least some of the clubs in Western NY, later in the other places I've lived, and of course now in Louisville.
Given my experience, I think that *actual* issue is that, instead of sexual services actually being more available now than they were then, it is really the patrons' perceptions that have progressed. I believe sex was just as available then as it is now, but most people aren't *aware* of that availability until they've been going to strip clubs for a number of years.
To be fair, I also believe that sites like TUSCL, and the internet in general, make it much easier to *find* where sex might be had, but again, that's a perception issue, not one of actual availability. People just getting started in the strip club hobby have a much easier time finding out both generalities and specifics, whereas when I, and I presume many others, started, it was a matter of canvasing the actual clubs and spending time feeling things out. Again though, that doesn't mean it wasn't *available*, just that it was more time consuming to find.
Thoughts?
35 comments
Back in the old days, you probably could have found sex in clubs in some areas of Detroit, but I would have been afraid to go to those clubs. I have always liked upscale clubs with beautiful women, and such clubs did not provide sex back in the day.
Of course, I did not become a strip club regular until a few years ago. In the past, regulars probably could have hooked up OTC with their favorite dancers just as they do today.
The other possiblity is that you have just been in the right place at the right time. I have been clubbing about 20 years with a lot of travel involved. I have seen communities go from wild to mild, vice versa, and back again in a matter of months. Again, though, the wild did not really appear until turn of the century in most of the places i went to.
thick: The starting point for me was 1978. It was my 17th birthday, and some friends decided to take me to Fort Erie, which is where the full nudity was at that time (and the WNY clubs were religiously carding everyone for some reason I don't remember). The cheating girlfriend they were attempting to purge from my awareness wasn't even a fleeting memory after the second round with the very tight little Vietnamese girl who generously (for a very reasonable donation, according to the friends who paid it) offered to make me forget her. The following year, when I turned 18 (yes, this was before the drinking age was raised to 21, at least in NY), the WNY clubs turned out to be just as debauched, and in roughly the same ratio, as the ones I go to here in Louisville now.
"Right place at the right time"? Maybe so, but that means that pretty much every place I've been has been the right place. Admittedly, I'm not as well traveled as some here, but the east coast from NY to NC saw a lot of traffic from me for a number of years, and Kansas and Missouri were my home for several more before I moved here.
Thank you, whomever is responsible for this!
I am thinking that if it is so easy to arrange OTC in 100% clean clubs in 2010/2011, it must have been just as easy to arrange 10, 20, 30 years ago. This easy availability of sex via SCs did not just happen because my money and I appeared on the scene a year ago.
I can remember in High School begging girls to have oral sex with me. Now oral sex isn't even considered sex by most. I can remember dancers 15 years ago never offering me extras, now they routinely offer extras. But I am older and bolder too. So I lean towards the idea that sex is more open and available, and now I take advantage of it when I can.
There's several clubs in Topeka, Kansas which have been in town for more than 50 years. Some have moved around, but one of them is apparently still in its original building. There are a few little shacks behind the club which were once used for dancers having sex with customers.
My perception is that the fact that it was going down used to be more of an 'out-in-the-open' thing. The line between brothels and strip clubs was not very clear.
Then strip clubs became a more mainstream/accepted form of business. Now there are many, many clubs and they kind of fill in the gap between brothel and regular bar.
As an additional clarification, the overall ratio of ITC to OTC encounters has *decreased* for me since I started. Most were in the club when I was younger, most are outside the club now. I'll agree that the incidence of dedicated rooms for VIP style experiences have increased over the years, but there have always been things like dressing rooms and other non-public areas in most clubs.
This marked difference between my experience and most other posters is what led to my supposition that it's a difference in perception, rather than one of reality.
I suppose it's also possible that I've just been extremely lucky, but given some aspects of the rest of my life, I'd have to say that's probably not the case.
I think there are several factors weighing in, but one big one that hasn't been suggested yet is the internet. Basically, resources like TUSCL and (the late lamented) Can-Best strip club reviews, led men to understand the following: "Hey, somewhere else on the continent, there's a chick giving head in a strip club. But at this strip club, even according to a bunch of other guys, the chicks don't give head." From that came the inevitable next conclusion, "I'm going to that other strip club to see if I can get a chick to give me head." And then clubs AND THEIR GIRLS could draw adequate customers only if comparable levels of service were to be offered.
I recall trying to go to strip clubs, and trying to find escorts (like, for full-service; not some damn Ford automobile, doh!), before the internet.
The 80s were tricky. For escorts, in the 1980s you had the yellow pages for the escorts, but that was hit-or-miss and, if you didn't know some rich guys who had already had a few successes with their own swings at the hit-or-miss, then you didn't know what you were going to get into. Or you could take your risks with the street-walker scene, which, in some cities, was vibrant and kinda "normal" (f.e. New York City, Hollywood Blvd. in LA), whereas in several other cities it was just a spinoff of the "pimps 'n' ho's" movement and crack-cocaine addiction in the inner city, therefore dangerous for disease-transmission and for gunfire-risk, and a disgusting experience even if you did find something viable. And for strip-clubs, you had a bunch of cities that were famous for what they had -- Tampa, Vegas, a couple of other tourist destinations -- but those were not necessarily living up to the old vibe. New Orleans, for example, was famous for having a lot of "sin city" but really the 80s were a very clean, drab, and controlloed period for NOLa's strip-clubbing scene. The 1984 World's Fair in the summer had meant that by December 1983 everything "raunchy" had been shut down, and the economic crises of NOLa in the late 1970s (when all the oil industry escaped for offshore tax havens, or for the more friendly jurisdictions of the Texas rather than Louisiana legislature) meant nothing but trashy-trash was going on. Nobody really "knew" what was or wasn't going on anywhere. You couldn't pass safe information, you had no medium for sharing information, etc.. It was much more a seller's market for sex-services; consequently, strip-clubbing was free to remain outside of the sex-services market, for most purposes, with a few variances here or there.
Then in the 1990s, the internet slowly trickled its influence into the whole mix. I lived in Toronto at a time when the internet was really nothing but sex-services and some weird dudes who knew how to run multi-user dungeon programs (which were, in their own right, often just fronts for that other kind of sex-service, masturbation-games over the internet). I recall how slowly the damned pictures would load up on my 26K modem, driving me insanely bat-shit CRAZY as slowly from the top of the picture the girl's hair would appear; then eyes; then nose; and me waiting waiting waiting to see if she was a fattie or a hottie. Canadian internet activity was early, thanks partly to the fact that escorts are more legal (well, uh, "quasi-legal") up there; and thanks partly to the higher percentage of early "wired" families and homes, since the nation was essentially just like the USA except without the USA's lower and upper classes. Strip clubs in Toronto in the 1990s were a boom time for sexual and semi-sexual services, including (but never limited to) the vaunted "lap dance." I think Tampa experienced the same thing. We all had to start defining what the hell a "lap dance" was or wasn't; and less-informed customers and other people are still up in the air about whether or not a certain activity (groping the willie through the clothing without removing or opening any clothing, for example) is to be considered an "extra" for a "required" (and therefore expected) portion of a lapper.
So, I personally remember escort and strip-club web pages popping up as part of the growth of the internet. And I can say from my experience, anecdotally at least, that the rise of these sorts of web pages does also historically parallel, to a good degree, the rise of sexual and semi-sexual services in strip-clubs.
The perception v. reality distinction makes for a nice brain teaser, but the real test is if you are having sex at a club...then it is reality. You could spend a lot of time and money combing through clubs to find ITC-FS, which supports "chasing the perception" idea. Sites such as TUSCL can indeed reduce the time and money wasted trying to find reality.
My experience indicates that sex can be had in a great many more clubs than such service is alluded to in TUSCL reviews. The price becomes a serious issue at some clubs, as such pricing might lead one to conclude that sex is really not available at that club because no one (well, very few) would pay that much for it. So, it gets down to some girls will do anything for enough money.
Very circular.
But there's an interesting ancillary development going on, here, as well, which actually runs counter to intuituion (well, counter to MY intuition). For many girls, there's a perverse reverse-incentive to NOT give in to a guy's request for sexual services, regardless of price, and regardless of the laxity or restrictiveness of the club. The incentive is, that generally a girl suspects that guys chase after NEW girls. So, by not "putting out" early, the girl gets more lap-dance opportunities. By fucking right away, the girl only gets one shot at that guy, and then has ruined any future profit she might have gotten from him.
Thus, frustrating as it may be, girls are actually motivated to "resist" being "too easy," even when they're girls who fuck for money. Damn it all ...
Maybe sex did happen 20 years ago. But for guys like me, maybe lacking good looks, or great conversational skills, it was just a myth. Now I'm even older and uglier and I can get it for a C note. So I don't know how one can say it's not vastly more permissive.
I would like think that us customers learned along the way too, and as time progressed became more than a match versus the other side. Certainly watching the attitudes on this board evolve over the years to the point where few now disagree my own stance (whereas before I would be attacked by an army of ass-kissers) indicates that this is so.
It's not so complicated to describe or understand. :) But it's not very easy to bring about or enforce!
ITC in strip clubs sanitize it. Girls have to at least be somewhat able to hold it together, you get to see and talk to a girl before you commit, management has a vested interest in making sure you're satisfied and coming back (in exchange for a cut) and you're probably less likely to get caught because I figure city hall/the cops are on the take.
I'm yet to meet a girl that was overly offended when I asked about extras, though normally I ask in a roundabout way "what do you do in the VIP." They might not give a straight answer, but if they don't do extras, they'll usually be upfront about that.
I have noticed that extras menus have gotten a lot more restrictive and expensive. Like at Desire Providence (my "home club") pre-pandemic most girls did FS for $200. Now, a few will do that, but now that only gets you a handjob and often a reluctant one. Sounds like at other places, Bidenflation (or perhaps pandemicflation) has set in as well.
After my next FKK adventure, I'm thinking about a break from clubbing. I crave the dirty, subversive feeling of it, maybe it's subconscious punishment in my fucked up head. Once it becomes mundane, it becomes boring.
Usually me.
I know where Robert Kraft will be.
Just because you can afford Masa doesn't mean you won't occasionally crave Wendy's.
Occasionally. But one gets better at detecting the ones likely to be welchers, or one doesn't last long. I've walked out of VIP disappointed before, and will no doubt do it again.