Attractiveness & Standards
SnakePlissken
Hello my lecherous friends, I was thinking about this earlier and you all would definitely be the people to ask.
How stringent are your standards about who (stripper or otherwise) you will bang?
About a week ago I went on a date with this chick I met online (not through AFF, thanks for the recommendation on that one), and found out the hard way that her profile pictures were severely out of date and misleading. I invented some pretext to leave early and bugged out.
Also, I was hanging out with a friend of mine who told me he was seeing a girl for the past few months and getting pretty consistent sex from her. I ended up meeting her later and was totally unimpressed. She was pudgy and had a chubby face. Personally, I wouldn't have sex with her even if she offered. She wasn't hideous, but she wasn't anything special.
I know some people are of the philosophy "a nut's a nut", but I simply can't operate that way. A pretty face is an absolute must for me, nonnegotiable. The biggest thing that I think makes my standards eliminate so many potential hookups is my preference in weight; I personally find even being a slight bit overweight disgusting, and I could never get past that, even beer goggles are futile.
So, what are your views? Have they always been that way, and If not, what changed them?
How stringent are your standards about who (stripper or otherwise) you will bang?
About a week ago I went on a date with this chick I met online (not through AFF, thanks for the recommendation on that one), and found out the hard way that her profile pictures were severely out of date and misleading. I invented some pretext to leave early and bugged out.
Also, I was hanging out with a friend of mine who told me he was seeing a girl for the past few months and getting pretty consistent sex from her. I ended up meeting her later and was totally unimpressed. She was pudgy and had a chubby face. Personally, I wouldn't have sex with her even if she offered. She wasn't hideous, but she wasn't anything special.
I know some people are of the philosophy "a nut's a nut", but I simply can't operate that way. A pretty face is an absolute must for me, nonnegotiable. The biggest thing that I think makes my standards eliminate so many potential hookups is my preference in weight; I personally find even being a slight bit overweight disgusting, and I could never get past that, even beer goggles are futile.
So, what are your views? Have they always been that way, and If not, what changed them?
32 comments
^^
same here snake ;)
i've passed on alot of free pussy over the years because the lady didn't meet my standards.
Snake, you said " I find even a slight bit overweight disgusting".
To me, some girls are thick (which I like) and some are fat (which I don't like). Snake, what do you consider to be overweight? Do you think Kim Kardashian is overweight?
Just trying to get an idea of what you consider to be fat/and or overweight.
Rule of 3/4: No more than 3/4 my weight. No more than 3/4 my age.
LOL don't get me started on the false advertising on dating sites. 10 -15 y/o pictures can be common, not to mention 30 to 40 pound weight adjustments. When it says average, their not talking about what the average woman of her height should be. Average today is chunky!! Athletic can be a 200 pound former shot putter.
I know a nuts a nut, but I would like my big head to be able to enjoy it as much as the little head.
The only thing I know worse than a gold digger is a fat ugly gold digger.
I myself have the Seinfeld syndrome. I going to find something wrong no matter what! Probably why the 911 call to my death bed will be made by a stripper or a sugar baby on the way out the door!
What really matters is that we all get, what we enjoy!
Good question, I would generally say that I don't prefer thick girls, but I don't consider them overweight. Of all the images I saw googling Kim Kardashian I wouldn't consider her too fat. I'm pretty slim and generally prefer my women that way too. As a rule of thumb, if the woman's hips are wider than her shoulders, or she has the spare tire stomach, it's too much.
"Snake, sounds like you are picking up lying bitches off of POF or something"
You are exactly right, sir. At least I got to learn that lesson without actually buying her anything.
"I would like my big head to be able to enjoy it as much as the little head"
I know what you mean. Perhaps it's a bit Charlie Sheenesque, but I think who I bang reflects on me, and I don't want to think of myself or be thought of as the guy who bangs fats chicks.
I've found women attractive in different ways. A great personality and face can make me overlook weight, just as a great body can make me overlook the face and personality. There's also the matter of whether you see them mainly for sex or to also spend social time together. Sex partners can make lousy social partners.
Last girlfriend was thin and homely. That's fine. You don't see the face when they're doggy style, anyway.
I'm pretty fit myself so I go for the same. Fat is a turnoff which in the USA is a big problem, as 2/3 of Americans are overweight or obese. Yuck! I have much better luck in Canada where women are THINNER, more of them are FIT, and they're a lot friendlier. That said, fit women are still not too rare, even at my age (mid 40s), especially among professionals who do competitive sports and have their shit together.
FWIW, Kim Kardashian is way too fat for me. Marisa Miller looks great, bordering on TOO skinny, but fit like that is hot.
This preference goes back to teenage years, where nothing turned me on like the lean athletic girls who still had curves from nice musculature. Girls that other guys liked because they had big boobs and butts were all over me and I didn't care, while I'd go nuts trying to hit on the track team and the dancers in the drama dept.
I've been with a couple of hot fatties (fat by my standards anyway) but in general I haven't enjoyed softer flesh as much.
I've never known a woman with a fat mouth, if you get my point.
http://www.photographyabdu.com/wp-conten…
(I've never tried inserting a picture before - sorry if it didn't work. Which brings up another point - I wish we could delete/edit posts like can be done on other boards.)
You did well. She is NOT fat.
Cripes, I don't even know how to post a photo for my tuscl profile!
I like slim girls (probably many would call too skinny), with long, straight silky hair. Pretty face - or at least cute. And preferably early- to mid- 20s. To me, hair and face are the first things that catch my attention. Really pretty face and nice hair can make up for a lot of things... but cannot overcome fat!
For instance, Kim Kardashian fat?! No! But, I WOULD term her as being thick - too thick for my preference. She has a very pretty face and nearly perfect hair... so, yeah, I'd hit that in a heart beat.
Nasty, natty-looking, frizzy or even slightly greasy hair? Deal breaker! I don't care if she has the most perfect body and a smokin' hot face... no thanks!
At least in America. I was in Germany two months ago and it was insane. All the girls are stylish, thin, and beautiful.
As far as the young women go, I have to agree with Hitler, they really are the master race.
Oral fixation and a missing gag reflex!
Same for men, by the way. Old fat farmerart sticks out like a bloated beach ball wherever he goes in France!
I don't mean grossly obese, but I love slightly thickner woment. The Kardashian sisters, Britney Spears (even when she was a bit out of shape.) Carmen Electra. Jessica Simpson (body more than the face).
Ya'll can have Vanessa Hudgens and Jessica Alba.