In the thread titled, "Smoke Gets In Your Eyes", mention is made that a smoking ban hurt bar business. Is this true?
I think it might hurt meat market regular bar business, but smoking isn't integral to viewing naked women and having them grind on your lap. The top rated club in the US is non-smoking and non-drinking(MONS VENUS)and they're not hurting for business. Neither is 2001 Odyssey.
So what do you think? If you are a smoker, and your locality banned smoking indoors in all businesses, would it keep you from visiting the strip clubs? Would having to go outside to smoke abolutely ruin your experience? Conversely, if you're a non-smoker, does the presence of smoke force you to leave earlier than you would like? Does ventilation affect your choice of club?
I am a rabid anti-smoker. I hate the smell. I hate my eyes burning after sitting in a club for a few hours. I hate that I can't wear my suede jacket for fear of smoke smell getting impregnated in it.
I've been to Mons Venus and 2001 and I'll tell you, being able to leave only smelling of dancer perfume is a nice change. No burning eyes, no scratchy throat.
Maybe the design of the clubs I visit is partly to blame. It seems that better smoke eaters/vent fans/ventilation would help.
I wonder how much strip club business is lost NOW because clubs are too smoky? There are more non-smokers than smokers, after all.


I honestly don't think it affects strip clubs to the same degree that it affects other businesses. Here in Louisville, if the claims and statistics of the smoking ban proponents can be believed, restaurants and bars have had a slight uptake in business since the ban, though I don't know if strip clubs are included in those stats. In the Buffalo, NY area, a couple of strip clubs that I went to there claimed that the ban did increase their business, especially with regard to female patrons.
Based on my own personal observations of before and after the ban (anecdotal at best), there's not much difference in attendance. I only get to a club once or twice a month, though, so maybe my observations aren't the best evidence. :)
Apparently a couple of the clubs in the Louisville area, after allegedly suffering loss of business as a result of the ban, have begun allowing smoking on their premises despite the ban, supposedly charging for the ashtrays to offset the cost of the fine. These clubs claim that their business suffers, even if everybody else benefits, a fact which bothers the city council not at all, of course.
Personally, smoke never stopped me from going to a club. Watching naked women dance and the potential for fondling lady parts tends to outweigh the discomfort and, to a certain extent, the risk. Any of the dancers who smoked, at least the ones I was interested in, were always considerate about it, not smoking at my table, and even popping a mint or something after they were done.
Politically, which, IMO, is what the issue really is, despite claims of health and safety, I suspect that had there really been as much desire for a smoking ban as the proponents had claimed, we would have seen a lot more restaurants and bars banning smoking on their own. The fact that they did not do so tells me that they weren't exactly being flooded with complaints about the smoking they did allow, or they would have banned it on their own, as McDonald's and a number of other restaurants have done for quite some time.
/gm