Comments by Puddy Tat (page 20)

^ Lizzo's message is good? That diabetes, sleep apnea, arthritis, hypertension, liver disease are OK because you're comfortable in your own skin? She needs to be less comfortable in it, and get a gastric bypass. Call me "fatphobic" but eating yourself into an early grave is a horrible message.

Bald like an eagle, baybay. More important with a civvie, as I don't want a hair in my mouth when I'm eating pussy. Dancers less important but less is still more. Hair also traps sweat and funk.

In other words, they're smartly trying to win the election by the predetermined rules. Trump/Vance 2024!

^ Touch grass

Private enterprise bothers liberals now as always, who think extracting wealth from the populace or monetizing office is the noble way to make a buck.

"I know quite well what separation of church and state means, and universally speaking it ain’t secular like a small minority taking the right of women to make decisions for themselves." Say you don't know what it means without saying you don't know what it means. No Bible in the decision. You don't like evangelicals having power is what it sounds like. The left is talking about passing laws to codify abortion, my question is where were they when they actually had a chance to?

^ Was the religious balance of the court OK with you when it put out liberal decisions like Roe and Obergefell? Sounds like you need to read up on what separation of church and state means. Liberals like you need to realize, you live by the SCOTUS, you die by the SCOTUS.

^ Roe vs Wade was almost universally agreed to be horrible reasoning which left it vulnerable, and Dobbs did that. Where was Obama on this when he had 60 senators?

@gammanu - it's amazing how fast they went from "she's a liability to Joe, boot her off the ticket" to "joy, joy, joy" and "Kamala is brat." Probably the most transparently I've ever seen the media take a side.

^ Which even RBG found to be shit legal reasoning.

I suggest that "service provider" be a urologist MD.

"getting into a fist fight with a stripper over who gets to take the breadsticks home from Olive Garden" LOL!

Just ask them. Or find ones who work as a dominatrix on Eros or Only Fans.

After 2-3 bad visits I'll give it 6 months. If it isn't better then I'll forget about it indefinitely.

Was Trump in that video or something? I was too busy staring at a gorgeous rack.

^ All we need to look at is how they're being treated. Biden and Obama sucking mullah cock and sending aid to Palestine and getting Putin invasions, vs Trump striking peace deals all around the Middle East. Biden embarrassing us in Afghanistan. IDGAF about the effete western European leaders who have gotten a free ride on our defense spending for years. They like Democrats because they let them get away with shit. The world was a safer place under Trump, full stop.

B. They're providing the same level of service. I tend to tip less for "simple" drinks (like a shot or straight something on the rocks) and more for "complicated" drinks like a frozen drink on he beach.

Look at who's getting the ink.

^ I did not blame one side, in fact I agreed with you. But court packing, no matter who does it, is the hydrogen bomb from which the court will not recover.

^ That didn't occur within the vacuum either, after Harry Reid took away the filibuster for judicial nominees. But Court packing is a genie that neither will be able to deny the other one it's out of the bottle. The Democrats add 4, the Republicans add 8, etc. It won't stop. The ethics issues are on both sides (e.g. Sotomayor) although the leftist investigative groups are only interested in unearthing one side.

I'm single so give me the professional. Just so I could know what it's like.

^ i agree that McConnell escalated it, and the next Republican president with a Democratic Senate majority leader is within their rights to do the same, but Court packing is an escalation on top of that and one that would be even more difficult to repair (because it'll keep increasing).

@ggofv - i think your heart is in the right place, but before the concerted Democratic campaign against the Supreme Court, no one saw 9 justices as a problem. They're sore that it, like freedom of speech, stands in the way of implementing their agenda unimpeded. They loved the Supreme Court when they found for abortion and gay marriage. So it sounds like "reforming" (LOL) the court is only about getting progressive policies implemented. That's a no, dawg. @ilb - not sure how that makes him a fuhrer but as invested as you are in calling him a Nazi, I'm sure you'll stretch something else.

"@puddytat, if you disagree with me please feel free to enlighten me. In all seriousness." I actually don't think we're far apart, except like I said homelessness is a problem of untreated mental illness. Lack of cheap housing is a problem of NIMBYism and regulations, primarily local. Homeowners vote, and they want cheap housing (depressing their own housing values) as much as they want gonorrhea. It's why New England NIMBYs (who are horrible) are all for green energy until wind turbines spoil their ocean view. I'm aware that most overstay their visas, which is a reason why to tackle it from the employer end. I think Skibum said make e-Verify a condition of doing business with the government, I'd say fine the shit out of any business employing illegals with half of it going to the informant. And if they keep doing it, prosecute them. This isn't a difficult problem if we don't want it to, it's that the left wants to show how pure and non-racist they are by flooding the country with illegals, and corporations (who are highly disproportionately Harris donors) want cheap labor. Harris' housing subsidy plan is an invitation to increase housing prices. If you want cheap housing, take away all the onerous permitting and regulations. That's local, not federal. I agree that Congress is fucked, but that's a larger problem of OUR polarization. MTG, Gaetz, AOC, Tlaib, Omar are a reflection of their constituents. We vote them in because we want to stick it to the other side. We want them to never give an inch. Another problem is that Congress has given away a shitload of its power, or at least looked the other way as it's been taken. They gave it to the executive to enact by fiat, or to SCOTUS to "find" rights that they couldn't pass. Barack Obama had 60 senators in Jan 2009, why didn't he pass a national abortion law then? He wasn't pro-life then, everyone knew Roe v Wade was a poorly-reasoned decision, shit, RBG said so. They need to nut up and take the power of the purse back. An alarming proposition I'm hearing is to get rid of the filibuster, or at least carve it out. We'll whipsaw between two diametrically opposed ideas every few years and nothing will get done. It's like paying one side to dig holes and the other side to fill them. Ditto for packing the SCOTUS. Progressives want 4 to give themselves the majority? (and that's the only reason they would choose exactly 4?) Don't complain when the GOP appoints 8 to restore their old ratio. It's a vicious cycle.

"Seems pretty clear that homelessness and lack of affordable housing are much bigger problems than any associated with immigration." Homeless is a problem of untreated mental illness, usually schizophrenia or substance addiction. "So, perhaps hyping the border problem is more about giving the Presidency rule-by-decree powers like a fuhrer." LOL, whatever. Trump wasn't a Fuhrer in his first term. He didn't need a wall, just Remain in Mexico. Now if he just cracks down on employers of illegals, we won't need a wall. The border and illegal immigration are a real problem especially for strained social services like we're seeing in many cities. "who blocked Congressional action to legally reduce illegal border crossing and admission of asylum seekers." LOL, you mean the bill that would have codified and legitimized high levels of illegal immigration? It was a political stunt for a bill they knew wouldn't pass, and you're just playing along. The acceptable level of illegal immigration is zero.