Comments by BobbyI (page 14)

I'll shot an e-mail over to founder.

Come on, shadowcat. Would you want to know? I mean if you had a crystal ball and could use it to tell with 100% certainty, won't the fun of wondering and worrying and all the drama be ruined for you? They know your "mind" thrives on these things. That is why you are drawn in even knowing deep down that you'll get burnt in the end. Maybe if you were younger there might legitimately be the slightest chance. But then the more money you spent and over a longer period of time the more that sliver of hope would decrease. But, of course, this post won't convince you. Want a real litmus test? Stop spending money on her for a few months and see what happens. Be sure to report back here. Oh wait. Don't bother we ALL know exactly what will happen. (Hint: if there anything was going to happen she would make it happen, and you won't be experiencing all this doubt. She would be all she could to make it clear to you it was real.) Man, are you one dumb fuck.

I wonder if "njcsfan" will jump in here and accuse of me of lying about putting in paragraphs and being able to see them now.

I have version IE version 7.0.6001.1800

What browser are you using? I see paragraphs in my review. But when I click on people's names I don't see paragraphs in their reviews (although when I go to the club I then see the paragraphs). Have we found a TUSCL bug?

I definitely put paragraphs in when I wrote the review, and when I look at the review now I can see paragraphs. That troll-girl njcsfan is just being disingenuous again. If my review is so obviously phony how did it get published, or why hasn't it been taken down? Also I explicitly asked njcsfan before I published to tell me what level of detail he would deem necessary for him to consider my review legit. He declined to specify anything, which, in my books, means he loses his right to complain now. In any case, thanks jablake and abreeguy for the feedback. I don't have much experience in review writing, but will take your suggestions into account in the future. As for my review being "self-aggrandizing". Are you saying that because it ended in how I met up with a stripper afterward? I would have picked a different club to review, but njcsfan insisted that it be a club that I had "pulled" a stripper from for OTC sex afterward. Anyway, good to hear child-of-an-alcoholic has finely (*wink*) realized that I will bust his troll ass back down again and again, any time he is willing to crawl out from under his rock. Wise of him to completely given up now. Total victory over njcsfan is mine! And Quite Easily Done!

^^^ holy shit! Did I smash that troll to smitherens once again or not... Man, do you really mean to tell me he had all his hopes pinned on me not being able to post of review despite what others warned him? Bad read, njcsfan, bad read. Given your poor judgment I sure hope your not responsible for making any important decision that have consequences for others.... Anyway... Time for you to go join parody and MisterGuy on the troll heap of TUSCL! *victory dance* *LMFAO*

Too funny! njcsfan: you are just plain lying or imagining I said things I didn't (probably the former). I won't break it down point for point. However, I'll just analyze a couple of examples for the edification of anyone (is there anyone?) reading this thread. Let's take this one: "you state you have had repeated acts of sex with 5 strippers and an unspecified number of civilians, and had a girlfriend (a girlfriend you spent so much time with she wanted to marry you), all in the space of one year, yet claim you always wait 4 months of abstinence before testing for every known disease, and then fully disclose your sexual history. (Mathematically impossible. There are only 12 months in the year, which would limit you to 3 different sex partners in the year.)" You are partial correct. I have had sex with five strippers in the last year, and before that with a gf who wanted to marry me. The five strippers came after the gf. I never claimed that I ALWAYS wait 4 month between partners. That is your big "mistake" I said I was doing it now because it was time to get a gf. For strippers and other whores there is no time out. Heck, I might even do a couple of them within a week or two weeks of each other. Get this: even in the period when we would expect STDs caught from one to be asymptomatic but still transmissible to the next! How about that? Anyway, "nice" try at math. In b) your logic is a little broken here: You say that if you claim I am gay that is not a lie, b/c everything I say is potentially fabricated, and I really could be gay. Your "you are gay" weakened to "maybe you are gay". However, by that logic, since everything you or anyone else says on here is also potentially fabricated from my POV, then by your "logic" I too can say someone is gay and not be lying. Ooops! Made a little logic blunder there, just like your math blunder in a). Anyway... Looks like I've crushed your troll ass once again! You really make this too easy for me. I have no idea what you do for a job, but I sure as hell hope it is nothing involving law. If it is truly pity your clients.

Hey, njcsfan. I'll try and keep this short and not flame. a) You say I lie all the time online and it easy to spot them. I think it's more the case that you misremember thing or believe that I have said things I have not said because parody and MisterGuy claim that I have. Name one lie I've told. (And, no, out of context sarcasm does not count.) b) You say you never lie online. But then how do you explain your inconsistent statements: I am 13. I am a homosexual. I have have no money. I have unprotected sex with "countless" female strippers. I never have sex. I have erecticle dysfunction. I cannot publish a review because I have never been in a strip club. It's logical impossible for all these statements to be true. So you must be lying about one.

njcsfan: Thank you for FINALLY admitting that lying to your wife would be worse than someone who lies to complete strangers online! You have earned your review!

"For obvious reasons I will not specify the real names of any girls who did extras either OTC or ITC." Should have said "real or stage names".

njcsfan: "You're the one evading, not me. " On the contrary, njcsfan. I've been asking a simple question which you have been evading all thread. I'll try again, but I know you won't answer (but maybe some miracle will happen and you wll). If you do answer I will tell you the name of a strip club I've been to. Heck, if you give me a straight answer rather than a weaselly one (my prediction) I'll even write a review of it! Heck, I'll even let you specify what you would deem "suffecient detail" to guarentee its authenticity. (Only thing. For obvious reasons I will not specify the real names of any girls who did extras either OTC or ITC.) My question is the same as it has been all thread: Suppose (for the sake of argument, in reality I have not) that I really had told lies on this anonymous internet message board to complete strangers. Would that be better or worse than the lies you (admittedly) tell your own wife so that you can fuck 20+ hookers a year without her knowing? That's it njcsfan. Answer that one and I'll tell you a strip club I've been too. If your answer is straight then I'll post a review. (I predict you'll just try to evade it (like you evade responsibility with your wife) with something like "Well other guys on here do it, so why does it matter?) So you up for it, njcsfan?

Too funny. No I don't care about your social security number, or address or phone number or real name or who your employer is. All that could be lied about, anyway. It was an ethical question I had in mind, no compromise of "real identity" required. I've answered lots of your questions here. I'll answer your question if you answer just one of mine. Hell if it's a straight answer, I'll even post a review! So what do you say, njcsfan. You up for it? Or are you too chicken? *bawk* *bawk*

I'll tell you what njcsfan. You're asking alot of questions here. I'll answer that one. But first you have to answer one very simple question of mine. Deal?

I didn't say I won't espond I'm just trying to do so without "flaming". I haven't fucked any strippers ITC this year. Like to meet them OTC.

Ok, I get the part where he deduces that I've had sex with strippers in 2008. However, I am not sure he goes from "has not" (or even "will not") post a review to "cannot". Can someone help me out here?

SuperDude: Only possible if Britain also lost its navy and airforce. Even then the US had an Atlantic fleet so it's still very doubtful. If are you thinking some long term war where Germany builds up a navy (and other technology) after defeating Britain that is interesting, although the US would then also build its own technology so I still don't think it's a win.

njcsfan: Even though you have not answered my question to you (and I know you never will) I'll answer yours. The answer is "yes". Now that being said, on the advice of clubman, I've decided to take a little break from busting you trolls (having already busted your asses so thoroughly, and none of you being much a challenge): So have at it. I'll let you little children have your little party for a bit. Should be amusing.

"One place I wouldn't nominate is Walmart. I usually see more horrifically ugly women there than anywhere I can think of" chandler shops at Walmart? *LMFAO* I mean I know "failed writer" didn't pay well as a job, but even I never guessed he was that white trash. (too funny)

clubman: you may have a point. and besides I've busted those trolls asses pretty good and I don't think there are any more left to bust on this board at this point in time. I will seriously consider your council.

So we now have davids = RL = David9999 = BobbyI is that correct? Along with Kyle = jablake?

Hey, chill out Sheik. Only in your imagination is anyone of this thread suggesting they wanted the Axis to win, let alone Bin Laden/Hussein. Take a valium and chill!

^^^ man did I kick that fucker's ass again, or what? He makes it too easy for me. Open Invitation to TUSCL: parody, njcsfan, and MisterGay were too easy. I wanna crush a more talented troll. Send me a better one!

Here's the "admission" that njcsfan is refering to (quoted in context as a typical example of njcsfan's disinegnuity): http://www.tuscl.com/discussion/65064 "Alcohol's not my cup of tea. Now other drugs. That's a different story. And, yeah, it often has been Viagra to the rescue." Yeah, some ED when taking certain drugs (recreational ones which affect blood pressure). No problems when not high however. More examples of njcsfan lying. You got to love it when the troll can't even keep his lies consistent. So let's see according to njcsfan: I'm 13. I have no money. I have unprotected sex with "countless" strippers. I am a homosexual. I have erectile dysfunction. I never have sex. How many inconsistencies can you count? Nice try troll-girl!

njcsfan: "I wrote the individual privately and asked him to retract his post. " From what I recall of the thread it was not a polite e-mail njcsfan. Heck, I received a unsoliticed hate e-mail from njcsfan myself once. As I say, I guess he never learned any diplomacy from his alcoholic father: only how to have violent outbursts.