Comments by David9999 (page 5)

I've done everything I can do avoid going personal with you, but after your (what) 29th? personal attack against me, I'll respond in find you're a fucking asshole

SO GO PLEASE FUCK YOURSELF because you've pushed me beyond any reasonable limit

I've posted in good faith controversial opinions on certain topics and mentioned my experiences and am sick of your fucking bullshit NJSFAN

njscfan - you're a sick fuck, you know that, its not surprising your first wife dumped you

once again SHOW ME WHERE IT SAYS I HAVE TO WRITE REVIEWS or STFU

As for reviews, show me where it says we have to write reviews

However some insist in making a big deal about nothing

Every one one of my posts that pertains to factual matters is 100% accurate, as for my opinions the on non-monogamy as an independent attraction point, that's obviously an opinion which some agree with, agree with in part, or disagree with.

hey, if i'm 15 I'm probably a genius of some type then, so maybe I should pretend to be 15 years old just to amuse you

more wiki lawyer bullshit

my "vast fortune"? lol

Bobbyl - don't you think it sometimes more than just about just fucking strippers or maybe AMP girls? Ok, his story sounds remote, but maybe there's a thing, you never know. I have this one particular AMP girl, a real (Korean version of a what's best described as a "China doll" (tiny round mouth deal etc)) type, low 20's, petite, augmented probably large B's or something, not much of an ass, however nice voice, real feminine, very very pleasant, and I've made sure about 50% of anything spent at AMPs -ends up in time spent with her I can sometimes sense a bit of loneliness in her, and she appreciates a customer being nice to her and treating her decently. Apparently some of their customers are pretty bad, and some of these girls will respond in kind when you're a gentlemen.

You don't find (in the particular state I often try to visit) there are not too many patrons going for "strictly therapeutic reasons" unless one considers screwing a young and beautiful asian girl as "therapeutic" There's one of two AMP girls I know if they could ever kiss like its real instead of the typical AMP dry mouth peck - I don't think I would need to go to strip clubs very often. I've asked a number of these girls "does anyone really actually kiss in Korea" and usually (as is standard) they repeat the question and have no answer because they don't understand the question. One finally understood it and laughed and then said "in Korea....they give real kiss"

actual discussion I had just a few days ago with an american (100% english speaking) dancer - and I know in the past 7 to 8 years this girl who has both the right look and the right personality working for her - has done very well, guessing easily more than 50k a year recently, and probably way more before the slowdown Customer (referring to her club earnings) "do you pay any taxes at all?" Dancer "none" Customer "You just keep the cash and don't even file?" Dancer " basically that's it" Customer "does the club issue any 1099's or other forms of any type?" Dancer "nothing at all"

LOL, no "5000 per pop" I think that's Spitzer thing. Jarblake, in terms of the cash outlay of 5k (in an overall sense) it was not significant, however in terms of spending that much in 5 weeks on one dancer - THAT is unusual and I don't think particularly wise. Among other things in this situation I had a particularly special AMP girl out of town for a month during the same timeframe and and decided to focus on this one dancer, plus the dancer convinced me to put another ATF type on hold (not the one cited below). I wrote about the overspending issue back in October, and in general I believe it should be avoided whenever possible, but hey some of us get carried away sometimes, especially when these strip clubs keep bringing in hot new dancers. In the case of this particular ATF (with the spy) I've barely averaged much over a 1000 to 1500 per month (gross before house fees)in the time I've known her, but I guess these days that's big money given the economy etc The "spying" thing I find amusing and (if I could) I probably would have dropped a dime on myself, because this particular ATF appeals to me far more than this new dancer, and anything that might spice it up is always a real plus.

njsfan No one has "trapped" anyone in a "corner." The problem is that Wikipedia "lawyers" like yourself rarely know what the fuck you're talking about. I'm aware now and have been aware for several years of any nuances in the law in regards to this particular issue as it might apply to me, and I'm also aware of the ongoing legislative efforts to change the law. For the third and final time "I've violated no laws AS WRITTEN (and interpreted) in any jurisdiction in the United States." So please STFU once and for all.

"the club had like 30 dancers and 1 customer" I've been in a club with the same deal with almost as many dancers, for example a few time when they were doing the late afternoon SHOWCASE with the gowns etc. Of course in case I had decided to walk out the male DJ and the female bartender would still see the show

Jarblake, excluding parking tickets and (literally) a few speeding tickets over the years, none. Like most other people I tend to follow the law.

Once again. "I've violated no laws AS WRITTEN (and interpreted) in any jurisdiction in the United States." BookGuy - the issue pertains to a human and pre-human timeframe arguably running back 3 to 5 million years. In evolutionary terms the timeframes you are now citing are "recent history" whereas what matters in genetic terms is the larger blocks of time. You are in effect dealing with maybe 30 seconds in a 24 hour geologic clock, when the issue presented is about what happened (i.e what worked into DNA) during the other 23 hours 59 minutes and 30 seconds of "human" history. Resource production by the male has always been a factor in female attraction, and its a primary reason why tribal systems developed. Certainly large amounts of wealth in modern times (maybe even a mere steady job in hard times) could be an attraction point, and in some cases actually turn on the female "chemistry" switch. However, today plenty of (confident) "nice guys" have the steady job - but it usually doesn't get them anywhere with the most attractive women unless they can switch it on somewhere else.

Aside from MEAN GENE, also note the THE SELFISH GENE by Richard Dawkins, with his basic theory seeing humans as suvival machines pretty much largely controlled by genetic "decisions". However as for the general concept of "male non-monogamy as an innate attraction point for women" or any tie-in to the ongong nice guy debate, I don't think you will see it written about in any mainstream publications anywhere, unless its very recent. Apparently its simply too politically incorrect or is considered gender bashing of some type - and seen to give license for males to do all sorts of bad things. The biggest problem appears to be the notion of genes as making "decisions". Probably 99% of people have considerable difficulty accepting that this is possible in any way when they first encounter the subject.

Do you enjoy just making things up? Do you even understand the difference between yearly income and net worth? Show me where I claimed 7 figures a year income. In fact its about half that. but over time, yes, it adds up to a considerable amount. The incident I described was the ONLY problem I've ever had with a staff member and its duration was probably less than a minute or two, and it was about a bartender feeling old and maybe jealous of a dancer about making big money, and it was defused very quickly. However, I see you insist in making a huge deal out of it. By the way, I've violated no laws as written in any jurisdiction in the United States. As for the rest, you truely do not understand the deal. Your personal prostitute now has leverage over you for the duration of any applicable statute of limitations. Odds are she won't do a thing, however you have in fact exposed yourself to considerable risk. Save your "Mann Act prosecutions are selective and rare" bullshit for your negotiations with her tort lawyer.

"Any proof that it's the non-monogamy and not just preselection that is attractive?" When dealing with the "chemistry" of attraction and so forth, it clearly tied in with subconscious involentary female reponoses - clearly operating outside of the modern rational thought process. Obviously if women know other women are attracted to a certain male, yes, they themselves are more likely to be attracted to the same guy, however to test the issue it would involve an A to B comparison (with each guy presumed equally attractive to women in general) - one guy as the confident nice guy and other guy as the confident guy with a bit of the horndog vibe. Part of the problem is that the confident nice guy who comes off as monogamous - while he might be deemed to be attractive to other women, the fact that he's monogamous in a chemistry sense, makes him inferior to the horndog, since in terms of evolutionary logic he has lower odds of moving the particular woman's genes forward. Pre-selection is really not relevant to this situation.

njsfan 1. YOU'RE the one making a big deal about 5k. 2. You are either judgement proof or an idiot - because no high net worth individual would risk a possible Mann Act Violation via the interstate transport of a personal prostitute - for what? to save maybe a $1000 or $2000 on the use of an escort at the final destination? Add to this a far more practical problem, that being a possible tort action by this same prostitute on perhaps (just off the top of my head) 4 to 5 different causes of action - as she would literally have you over a barrel.

The "nice guy" definition is hardly elastic, there are certain consistent attributes that show up. As it concerns the most typical situation where women end up conflicted between what they SAY they want vs what they actually respond to and develop the all important "chemistry" for, the "nice guy" definition used by most women seems to fit a definite pattern, with such factors as faithfulness, sincerity, honesty, an overall respectful attitude toward women in general and them in particular, and other factors such as non-controlling behavior. In the (irrelvant side issue) case of wuss/doormat/ass-kisser type men, there is no conflict because women are not going around telling surveyors they want such men, so their distaste for such men presents no such conflict.

lots of these dancers will make like (after tip outs) 70 bucks one day, 150 the next etc - then every once and awhile some guy starts dumping money on them (therefore making the job way better than Walmart) - so they end up with 700 dollars for one day. However, those guys (dancers tell me) just are not hitting the clubs like they used to. Now if the clubs can somehow get lots of new patrons - they s/b able to come up with guys like this now and then