Trump Administration and Strip Clubs
Myoman
Should we be worried that the new administration will decrease the supply of strippers from foreign countries: Latin America, Russia, Ukraine etc.. Some of the hottest and most willing girls in the business are immigrants from these countries. Do many come in illegally? if not, will the new immigration "crack-down" make it harder for them to come. I hope not. What do you guys think?
23 comments
The new administration will cut down on the amount of trafficked women. Migrant caravans and coyotes are already trying to get their work in under Open Borders Biden before Trump comes in and puts them out of business.
There's just no way to deport 11 million illegals. Trump will go after the criminals (technically they're all criminals, since illegal entry is a crime) and those who have failed to appear for hearings first. He's going after Tren de Aragua and MS-13, not Marcela the cleaning lady or Mercedes the hot Cubana stripper.
Our immigration system needs to be badly updated, like tweaking the 14thA that requires at least one biological parent to be an American Citizen; birthright citizenship needs to be fixed. When a visa has expired, out you go. if you are here on a student visa and not in school, out you go or get a temp visa.
The Senate "Immigration" Bill is just an amnesty bill that is DOA. The May 2023 HR 2 that Schumer ignored needs to be brought up.
Project 2025: This worries you compared to the Democrat Marxists that own Education pre-K->College, MSM, Healthcare, Energy, ect that have been indoctrinating generations since 1978?
So what if some people support Project 2025. Welcome to the 1stA. I'm way more worried about Marxism growing in the USA. And there is a lot in Project 2025 I don't support. I 100% don't support Karl Marx's bullshit.
The Marxist Agenda has deep roots to the 1923 Frankfurt School that has a foundation in CRT as their agenda fails over and over as they continue to find new ways to promote it. Never heard of it? Just do a ChatGBT on "what is the marxist frankfurt school". Here is a clip:
The Frankfurt School, also known as the Institute for Social Research, was a group of Marxist intellectuals and scholars associated with the University of Frankfurt in Germany. It became influential in the 20th century, particularly for its development of Critical Theory, which sought to analyze and critique society, culture, and economics with a focus on the role of power, domination, and inequality.
Here are the key aspects of the Frankfurt School:
Historical Background:
Founded in 1923, the Institute for Social Research was initially established to study Marxism and social theory, with the aim of creating a more scientifically rigorous approach to understanding societal structures.
It grew in prominence during the interwar period, especially after many members of the school fled Nazi Germany in the early 1930s due to the rise of fascism.
The group was heavily influenced by Karl Marx and other critical theorists, but they blended Marxist analysis with insights from other disciplines, including psychology, philosophy, sociology, and cultural criticism.
Soros, Davos (I love how all these attendees scream about Climate Change as they all fly in on their private jets and creating a HUGE pile of trash), The UN, The EU, Frankfurt School, ect promote the Global Progressive Agenda, and this is OK with you?
The new appointed prosecutors will all bring their own priorities.
The other area of change that we'll see is more emboldened local police departments. We already have cases were police operate somewhat independently of the wishes of the city's elected officials & population. Police will be in a situation where they enjoy more legal protection. Given how large America is, it is probably safe to say that some departments will take it upon themselves to crack down on strip clubs and some will lessen the pressure. Of course, this is probably an on-going process of change anyway, but I suspect that it will be accelerated during Trump's term.
https://tuscl.net/discussion/86605
https://tuscl.net/discussion/86617
I'm laughing at how, when looking at the safety of women and children trafficked into this country, and gang members invading, your first concern is how it'll affect "our fun."
The fuck is wrong with you? Does safety and law and order not matter to anyone? Your only concern is whether or not you can still pay for pussy? I know we're a bunch of degenerate poon-hounds here but get some fucking perspective.
Deport every last illegal immigrant stripper if it means America is safer and more prosperous.
Wish he'd dump them.
The rise of Latina Strippers is more of an indictment of American stripper culture. The dancers simply want more for way less. It's always been that way to some degree. The difference is that the economy has inflated the prices to where mediocre dances aren't cutting it anymore.
The US manufacturing problem is similar in logic, why pay Americans more when we can pay less anywhere else for similar jobs and products.
It's easier and more marketable to go after easy targets. Strip clubs and escorts are relatively easier to destroy than a human trafficking operations.
Strip clubs are more of a local issue. But my point was we have idiot incels here whose first worry about restricting illegal immigration is "who are we going to pay to fuck?" It's completely selfish. Like human trafficking, rape, and gangs are secondary considerations.
I don't want internment camps, that costs money. Go after criminals, go after employers. Cut it off at the source.
I will admit that access to sex workers is a major concern of mine. I am willing to give up on some freedom if people are truly in danger. I think the problem boils down to the "boy who cried wolf" effect. (that's a free one for RickytheLion)
How many times has the public been informed of doing things to "stop human trafficking" for the actual reason in many, but not all, cases being just stopping regular soliciting. Soliciting is still a crime, but I'm sure you get my point.
Going after employers has been my plead as a Democrat for 8 years. Thank you.
I believe the problem is that too many politicians are bought off (both sides) by lobby groups to allow corporations to use cheap labor.
Internment camps do cost money, and they have too high of a risk to become unsanitary and abusive, even with good intentions.
The left, before it sold out to radical activists, used to be all for border enforcement. Bernie called open borders a Koch Brothers proposal, and it is. It does depress American wages. Yes, paying Americans more would cause inflation, but it would also give them more money to buy our stuff. Going after employers is easier than going after individual illegals. I saw someone propose it elsewhere, fine of $5,000 per illegal per day, half of it to the informant. That would dry it up like the Sahara.
Human trafficking is real. I'm not sure how many strippers crossed the RIo Grande but we see it in things like AMPs. I don't see ordinary strip clubs busted for it often (except for divey extras places where the girls don't speak English), usually it's ordinary prostitution or drugs.