City of Denver going after RCI clubs.
shadowcat
Atlanta suburb
The clubs are suspected of misclassifying dancers as non-employees to avoid paying them minimum wage, overtime and earned tips. The auditor's office said the clubs have not produced any financial records.
Denver City Council voted in April to give the auditor's office subpoena power to perform audits. This is the first time the office is using that power. The auditor's office is hopeful the subpoena will speed up its investigation.
"It's a win for Denver's workers that we had this process in place in time," Auditor Timothy O'Brien said in a news release. "This is the first time we are using this subpoena power and without it, we would be unable to conduct our investigation into whether dancers' rights are being violated."
The auditor's office is requesting three years' worth of contracts, contact information and payment records of dancers at each location.
The clubs have until Sept. 24 to respond to the subpoenas. After that, they will face fines of up to $1,000 a day, according to the auditor's office.
All three strip clubs are owned by the same company, RCI Hospitality Holdings, Inc.
In a statement, an attorney representing the strip clubs called the subpoenas "overreaching" and "unjustified."
The statement says in part, "In the Clubs' opinion, Denver Labor is sending the message that they are willing to ignore the bounds of the law in an effort to collect private data and information from individuals who are not under their jurisdiction."
The attorney said the clubs are prepared to go to court to fight the subpoenas and defend their business practices.
The auditor's office said it hasn't reached a conclusion in the investigation yet.
PT's Showclub on West Evans Avenue recently faced unrelated legal trouble. The club was shut down for two weeks in January following allegations dancers were engaging in prostitution.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
14 comments
Latest
Everything has an impact on each other, so if you force clubs to start paying a certain hourly fee to dancers, they can simply respond by increasing the % of fees they keep from dancers selling dances, or charging dancers a higher amount to work at the club. There’s multiple variables they can adjust, so simply forcing them to pay dancers an hourly wage doesnt automatically mean the dancers will earn more money because they may also decide to keep 50% of lapdance earnings instead of 25%.
A dancers earnings are a combination of tips, potential cuts received for selling drinks, an hourly salary, house fee/no house fee, and what % of lapdance/VIP earnings she keeps. If you try to force a club to pay a certain minimum hourly wage or force them to not charge a house fee, they can easily respond by keeping more of lapdance earnings or decide to keep some stage tips or split them up. Or they can even be more selective in their hiring and start cutting workers.
^^ Yeah, but clubs can fuck that up by disincentivizing dancers.