Does TUSCL lean more white knight or more USASG Creep

Based on the individual experiences reported by dancers of PMs from USASG creeps when Founder had dancer profiles and pictorials, I fear TUSCL has a substantial population of creepy lurkers who do not participate in forums, but who did creep through dancer profiles in a predatory fashion. White knights are, by their very nature, constantly seeking the limelight and virtue signaling. They wouldn't know what to do with pussy if they were ever actually presented with some, but there is no point being woke if everyone is not seeing it.

i'd say mostly guys just want to get off, which probably falls under USASG (what does this mean? did you forget to add the letter J and meant USASANJOSEGUY?)

the white knight shit probably will pop up if the "creeps" feel like they like the girl(s) for other reasons than the outcome ranging from a ldk quickie to a mind exploding bj/full fuck session.

I wouldn't be surprised we got a lot of creeps. I'm considered a creep by some family and others that consider my interest in ladies that is not in my own age group.

I don't know that White Knight and Creeps are mutually exclusive or the only two options out there.

I think we've got a lot of people who look at the strip club as a Girlfriend Supermarket (TM.) And that leads them down a path of extreme creepiness. But, that's a different type of creepiness from the predatory types. The guy who is waiting outside the club to follow Bambi home at the end of the night because he believes she really loves him is different than the guy who is taking off the condom while hitting it from behind because he thinks she has no recourse. I don't know which is worse, but I know they're different.

With that in mind, I think TUSCL has more lovestruck creepers and USASG has more predator creepers. Neither has very many white knights. But TUSCL does have more people who intend to have an honest/respectful interaction and strike a fair bargain.

USASG is "The pus that infects the mucous... that cruds up the fungus... that feeds on the pond scum." not only do they give out dancer names but I have seem thumb nail photos of a dancer that I know doing BJ and FS in a gang bang.

They ask dumb questions that they wouldn't have to ask if they read TUSCL. I read it just to see how perverted they are but I am not register and cannot post and I intend to keep it that way.

I like alcohol, sports on tv and naked women. I like strip clubs. They are part of my entertainment, like skiing, poker, golf and hiking. If I go a lot; great. If I don't go at all; great.

I guess we're respectful!!!

USASG, at least in my area, is "useful" and that's about it. The streetwalker section is *very* useful to find out who to avoid. The massage parlor section is also useful for revealing local trafficking operations about which, despite being textbook examples of such, most patrons do their best to remain willfully ignorant. The understanding of what constitutes a "good", or even "acceptable", blowjob is laughable. I gave up on trying out the escorts whose head game is "the best ever", because the vast majority haven't even been in the top half of all the blowjobs I've gotten.

There's little to no respect for provider privacy, and that attitude is all but encouraged by the admins. They pay lip service to provider privacy, and they will remove posts that reveal a provider's real name, but it once took me a week to get them to remove a link to the real obituary of a hooker.

The regular posters here, with a few exceptions, are head and shoulders above the regular posters on our local USASG when it comes to "respect", for lack of a better word. I assume that the true creepers on the TUSCL, the ones that have no problem repeatedly linking dancers to acts by name, club, and schedule, aren't regular posters.

Strip clubs? What are those? I’m just here to gain knowledge from the other people on the forum here. Sucks that SJG is gone because I sure liked to read his insights on VHS tapes and his detailed and thorough recommendations on places he’s never even been to before.

At least CJ Kent provides good quotes that I write on the walls inside bathroom stalls or rest stops when I’m traveling.

USASG -ahh ok i got it. that guide site is not mentioned very often here.

The white knight presence seems to be stronger on here than usasg. Usasg has it's shills but that population doesn't seem to be smitten by the dancers and determined to "protect" them (yes the same dancers who wouldn't give them the time of day unless there's a wallet full of money). I think having kids in high school, not being able to manage money, no skills, and hitching their wagon to drug dealing and wanna be rapper boyfriends will cause them more problems than being talked about on a web site.

"having kids in high school, not being able to manage money, no skills, and hitching their wagon to drug dealing and wanna be rapper boyfriends" cause them enough problems. Problems for which they and their bad decisions are solely responsible. So why cause more problems for them by saying "Cinnamon blew me in VIP for $50", so ThatXGuy can go to Rick's and become angry when Cinnamon won't blow him for $50? The scorned PL will then come on TUSCL and start sending her hate PMs and posting discussion lies about her being a ROB and having herpes, until eventually Cinnamon quits TUSCL and leaves Rick's. That's one extreme, and why extras girls should not be named and reviews naming them should be rejected (just state that extras were had, if you must). The other extreme is the incel PLs who treat clubs as girlfriend supermarkets and become RILs after the first lapper, and defend every ignorant utterance of the dumbest dancer in the hopes that she might send him a nude and fall into his arms for defending her online. Both of those extremes exist, and they are both necessary headaches and inevitable members of site likes this one.

I like breasts.....

What ski said 🙂

USASG guys are more degenerate than TUSCL PLs, but a degenerate is a degenerate. Just different levels of perversion.

There are certainly a fair share of white knights on TUSCL, though, preaching about needing to be respectful toward the girls (while still pursuing grinds for the girls smh).

On Muddy’s original question, yes, TUSCLers are more white knight by default. I enjoy the occasional dancer perspective on TUSCL, which I can find useful in the club. I do find USASG informative in the non-club hobbies.

USASG in seattle is more focused on which street walker will bareback you. The sc section is all about names and what act for how much. The admins don’t allow even the slightest conflict between PLs so the banter is nonexistent. I can’t recall seeing a white knight on USASG. It can be informative or creepy.

Tuscl has more standards wrt how we talk about the girls, but less wrt to how we interact with each other. Many of us hold strong opinions around treatment of the dancers in the virtual and real spaces, some might see that as white knighting. There are some full on White Knights here, but not many, probably bc there aren’t a lot of dancers here. I could name a few regular posters, but that would take this thread in another direction.

So I guess we are a bit more white knight.

USASG is for those who want action, TUSCL is for those who want talk. Many on this site eschew actionable intel as “too explicit,” and live in fear that a stray anonymous internet post is going to bring down the world’s oldest profession. But the levels of wisdom and abstract thinking among mongers is MUCH higher here; your typical USASG poster is looking for bareback FS from chicks who give it up like 16 times a day, so not intellectuals. Troll level is about the same, and the circle jerk clique of old-timers (see “average age” discussions) can get tiresome, but I laugh & ponder a lot more here than there. As to “creeps,” if you’re a monger you’re a creep. Ipso facto, deal with it. Embrace it. Let it shine.