founder.... another wish list...

and a EDIT button. (maybe with a time limit of an hour).

Regarding the edit button I think if it was possible with this board that founder would have added some form of one long ago.

my auto correct messes me up sometimes. and almost all other forums that i visit (different topics than tuscl) have an edit button. i admit a ‘edit’ option is probably a difficult thing to program. but it would help me correct my mistakes. i have fat fingers. and my brain is slow.

Most other forums don't have a significant group of people who try to "weaponize" or manipulate every new feature.

I'd be okay with an edit button on reviews as long as there's a way for users to see what got edited, how, and when (similar to a wiki).

I think the "thumbs up / down" is a good idea.

And if you can manage it, I'd also like to see Like/Dislike on the original thread starter comment.

I'll see what I can do. Maybe by next April 1 ;)

As I understand it, the lack of an edit button isn't a "cant" it's a "don't want to" and while I too wish sometimes I could edit a recent post to correct a typo or something I totally understand why the edit function is problematic in a scenario like this.

As far as the like/dislike stuff on the original Article/Review/Discussion thread I agree, that would be useful. If it's possible to differentiate between liking/disliking an entire thread and the first comment, that's a bonus. Arguably more useful than on the comments. So, I could Like the thread as a whole because its an interesting discussion, but still dislike the OP's comment.

founder...🤣🤣🤣

That’s a pretty cool idea

A better ignore fearure

I want to know who the last poster on a discussion topic is that is not on my ignore list. Right now I have to pull up the last poster just to see if there was anyone prior to him.

And founder... How about if we had a way of seeing the previous handles and email connections with different names on the forum?

Can we get a winning lottery number generator while you’re at it founder ?

A timed edit function could please both sides of this issue.