Are women more attractive because of their ass or are they already attractive.
Tiburon
Every woman's local ATM while in da club? How else they paying for their Boob jobs?
If you want the link to the subreddit thread here you go: https://www.reddit.com/r/Purple_Palace/c…
On the left, she has a visibly large (or just long) nose and slim lips with a skinny but healthy body. Her looks not as sheen and she doesn't get me wanting to move mountains, but she ain't ugly. ON the right suddenly, she looks cuter, the rear is giving me a solid poker and I'm suddenly attracted. But clearly it's just enhancements.
ANd it got me thinking about something. Does voluptuous assets on a women really make her prettier, perhaps justifying her self-confidence? Have we been warped and conditioned by social media to ONLY like big butts (I been a conisouir since I was 12 though it wasn't or isn't my top requirement and I have liked a lot of girls when I was a kid and ladies for less) and big tits? Has cosmetic surgery become so commonplace we can't see woman without large assests? Or perhaps it's just the enhancement of the photos we see online that compensate what they actually look like in person? What is the deal here? What is you guys and gals' thoughts on the matter?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
34 comments
Latest
I think more proportionally curvaceous women look more "womanly" and get then on be found as more attractive.
Again, there's plenty of love for smaller spinners, too.
This. Those two pics are extreme ends of the spectrum. I much prefer a woman who has neither a boy's ass nor one that is cartoonishly large.
I think it’s a trick camera lens.
Many years ago, possibly 25-30 years ago, there were waif type models. Those models were basically stick figures, and they were considered the epitome of beauty. I believe Kate Moss was one of those models. She was a beautiful girl, but her body did nothing for me.
This is likely where I get into trouble. I believe gay white males were determining the standards for female beauty. So, you got girls with flat chests, slender hips, flat asses, and sunken cheeks. They basically created a beauty standard that was like a young guy’s body.
As the prevalence of hip hop culture and Latin culture moved into the popular mainstream markets, a shift began. Back in the late 1990’s Jennifer Lopez was considered to have a large butt - beyond the normal definition of female booty beauty. In my view, she has a great ass, but it is far from a big booty.
The culture continued to shift through the 2000’s, and bigger butts have become very desirable. Compare the amazing booty of Nikki Minaj to Jennifer Lopez - and it’s obvious bigger butts have become more acceptable and desirable. To move farther - look at some of the Kardashian asses.
We are fortunate that Nina gave us a peek at her gorgeous round cheeks. She has filled out perfectly as she has described.
The photos posted by the OP are both very attractive views. The larger ass photo has become more acceptable and attractive as tastes have evolved and folks have become more accepting of big beautiful booties.
I will play along and comment on your discussion.
Male humans natural instinct identity healthy, fertile potential mates, the healthier the more attractive.
However in the USA and the world societies influenced by the USA imperialism and propaganda, mass media and popular culture influence how we shape our views and opinions about beauty standards, body image, and physical attractiveness.
That is why you are “attracted” to artificial enhanced “voluptuous” bodies creates with plastic surgery, photoshop, filters etc etc.
Just follow your natural instinct and you will find that the healthiest more fertile woman is the most attractive.
If your face or other parts are a train wreck, then that ass is not going to help you into my wallet. It's the old "nice legs, shame about the face", call her "But'erface", or a Picasso - good from afar, but far from good. I'll joke that love is just a light switch away, but no, it isn't really.
Otoh, a fat, ugly, cellulite, mudflap or other unattractive ass will ruin the whole deal. I hate to her go, but I love to watch her leave, unless she has a flabby or ginormous ass. I've been to clubs where a huge ass was such an asset, I couldn't get a dance. In 2017, Lookers eas packed with construction crews and fake asses. So packed it was literally shoulder to shoulder and you could not see her ass until you were in the lap dance room. She had a gorgeous face, great tits, a flat stomach, and just this bizarre mutant flesh ball growing out her backside. She thought I was all about and kept throwing it in my face until I thought I was going to be sick.
So no, an ass will raise her stock, but it can also sink her.
Plus some things look nicer in pictures than they feel in peraon.
Now there is a fine line between curvy and fat, chunky but you don't want to be up there looking like twig, that's not gonna work either. This anorexic, 90lb, bulimic bullshit idk where it came from but it has to go. Your allowed to eat.
@Nina sounds like your aging like a good wine, that's what I'm talking about.
From my angle I love boobs but I think ass is more important. Big ass with small tits is workable, no ass with big tits can be disappointing. But the good news is, any women can get an ass with no silicone help whatsoever. Just hit that gym, do them squats and you'll be all set. I would even say ass is even my best asset for myself, cause I'm always getting some in the gym. It's where there is the most equal opportunity in the looks world IMO. Even if your not a great looking girl, you can always get some sort of nice ass naturally.
Don't need stuff which would have to be taken off.
sJG
maybe because the pic is blurred but i had no idea that nina bambina has a nice ass. i already could tell she was at least an 8 from her first pic. her hair looks like it was pro-cut and that tanned skin of hers - nice!!! then add a nice ass to that mix and you have a potential fave you would forward to seeing at the club each and very time.
the girl's pics that the op linked - the left i would give a dollar to leave. pic on the right - i like them big like virgo peridot but not like that on the pic. the bigness on that pic is at the point of being utterly ridiculous.
Another thing I’ve noticed is the ethnic angle – in “general” it seems black and Latino guys are more into the thick/curvy/voluptuous women, whereas European/Anglo guys seem on avg to prefer the thin small-butt women (one exception I find is w/ Italian/Italian-decent guys that also seem to like voluptuous women) – this can somewhat be confirmed in the presence of big/enhanced butts usually being much more prevalent among black and Latina dancers/clubs – me being a Cuban-guy having been raised in Cuban-heavy Miami, it was uncommon to find other Cuban-guys that were into thin/skinny/non-curvy girls.
w.r.t. the pic in the OP, the one on the right (enhanced) would def get my attention more in the club and would def have a much-higher probability of getting-dances from me.
I’m middle-age and my pref for voluptuousness/curvy women def didn’t occur b/c of social-media; it’s just my innate pref and perhaps somehow someway influenced by my Hispanic roots – as w/ many things, hard to know how much something is nature vs nurture/environment – but I think w.r.t. what we find attractive it may be something we are born with.
No one ever told me who I should be attracted to – even as a kid, especially once I entered puberty, I was just way more turned-on by the sight of curvy/voluptuous women vs girls that just had a pretty-face – even as a kid/teen, I was more attracted to older women (late-20s thru early-40s) b/c they were often more filled-out (bigger-tits; wider-hips; meatier thighs; which is what innately has always turned me on).
As I’ve often posted in the past, the bod, especially a voluptuous bod, is way more important to me than the face – as I’ve posted in the past, I rarely will turn down a dancer whose bod I like b/c of her face, but have turned down many “pretty dancers” b/c their bod didn’t do anything for me.
So for me a girl packin’ in the ass and/or titties area will def go up a few notches in the 1-10 scale – I recall one time way back in my late-teens/early-20s that I was at a large public hospital downhere in Miami for a doc’s appointment – this is where most people w/o insurance went at the time – I recall I was sitting outside waiting for my appointment and about 10-feet-away is a thick-ebony – for w/e reason she turned back and looked at me more than once but I didn’t think much of it or her – she was wearing a long skirt but she didn’t necessarily have a huge-ass sticking out or anything to grab my personal-attention – she was wearing a very tight long-sleeve white elastic type top but I didn’t think much of her b/c nothing about her necessarily caught my eye – a few minutes later she turned around and OMG she had some MASSIVE DD natural tits that were supa-full and supa-firm (she seemed in her early-20s) – needless to say that for me she went for a meh ‘5’ to about a ‘9’ that I wanted to jump her bones immediately b/c of her massive natural tits – so yeah; for me personally, a big ass and/or big tits def make a dancer/woman go up several notches and will def go from “meh not really that interested” to “damn I want that”.
Fuck you're old.
SJG
Even though you were a kid when Abe Lincoln was pres, the same was true in the late 1980s and 90s when you were about 100. My mom and I were talking about how back in her days of stripping (late 80s into the 90s), women would be turned down from clubs for having a butt too big and if they were hired, other dancers used it as an insult. Today, even some of the higher end clubs are accepting girls with big asses so long as they are toned women.
SJG
Milk'n Blues - Hey Baby! | Academia do Rock Sessions
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8F5FUQdg…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MEGOprW4…