Ban san_jose_guy
IfIGottaBeDamned
Maryland
How’s this for an idea?
Like many others on TUSCL, I agree that SJG has become a major detriment to TUSCL. However, it seems unlikely to me that the flame war is unlikely to rid us of SJG anytime soon.
Here’s what I propose:
Everyone change the tagline in their banner to “Ban san_jose_guy”.
This message will be reflected on every post, every photo, every review. Past and Future.
This action has the following advantages:
1. It spreads the message far and wide with very little effort.
2. It lets new members who may be put off of participation that SJG is widely rejected. Perhaps new members would be more inclined to ignore SJG and participate.
3. And hopefully, when one way or another, SJG leaves TUSCL, everyone can easily revert their taglines to their former setting.
Your thoughts?
Like many others on TUSCL, I agree that SJG has become a major detriment to TUSCL. However, it seems unlikely to me that the flame war is unlikely to rid us of SJG anytime soon.
Here’s what I propose:
Everyone change the tagline in their banner to “Ban san_jose_guy”.
This message will be reflected on every post, every photo, every review. Past and Future.
This action has the following advantages:
1. It spreads the message far and wide with very little effort.
2. It lets new members who may be put off of participation that SJG is widely rejected. Perhaps new members would be more inclined to ignore SJG and participate.
3. And hopefully, when one way or another, SJG leaves TUSCL, everyone can easily revert their taglines to their former setting.
Your thoughts?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
37 comments
Others have been punted for less, It's long past due that he gets kicked out!
The nasty rapy right wing bigots should be cancelled.
Not sure what the answer is, but I'm thinking something like when you ignore someone then they can't comment on threads you've initiated. And of course you wouldn't see threads initiated by the asshole you've ignored. That would really fix a jerk like SJG. He could continue with his ridiculous antics, but only on his own threads or those created by people willing to tolerate him. When he tries to comment on a thread where he's been ignored, he gets a pop-up that says "You're not authorized to comment." That would drive him fucking nuts.
We had that for a while it worked well it was the two way ignore but for unknown reasons founder decided he didn’t like so he took it away.
He's generally only hostile to other members in reaction to their hostility and teasing. In contrast to many members who seem incapable of disagreeing without being nasty about it. But it's hard not to think there's a chance he has or could rape someone. He's into tying women up. Some people of course are into being restrained/tied up. But SJG is very delusional, he could delude himself that somebody consented when they didn't. Banning him obviously would not address this problem. He might post on here if had plans for particular woman, which could help in preventing anything bad happening to her.
Also, how many "ban SJG" threads do we need" Duplicate threads are even a little worse than reanimated zombie threads.
He said he dislikes censorship but I don’t think of that two ignore as censorship I think people should have the right to not speak to any they want, along with the fact that most folks are quite tolerant of opposing POVs as long as they are presented with civility it’s actually a good idea to separate yourself from folks that are intentionally offensive like SJG and Icee, let’s not forget that pimp troll is also aggressively involved in using terminology for the sole purpose of insulting people
your views and presence are not welcome on this here site, in case your demented head hasn't registered any of the above that's been posted. here's an idea that might appeal to all: how about starting your own youtube channel?
whatever thread you're going to initiate here is not going to go through to anybody here. you're just beating a dead horse with whatever it is you're trying to do over here.
however, with youtube you actually may get some kind of a following. having your own youtube channel can be potentially life altering shit. you'll have a much better chance there of being an influencer, or an over glorified troll, whichever you choose.
think about it. 20-40 people here or hundreds, maybe thousands? on youtube?
Aside from that, I guess it was the equivalent of an online "dirty protest" (Google it) or just a temper tantrum. Anyway, as much as I don't like SJG, I'm also not a huge fan of swamping the discussions.
I legitimately think that SJG is incredibly creepy and possibly dangerous. I'm not sure that giving him an online haven is a great idea. It's also not great that he's often the first impression provided to new customers and dancers here.
And at this point, he is (like his spoof troll) swamping the discussions. He's also hijacking other people's threads. For certain topics, it's essentially impossible to post a thread and not have it be dominated by his posts.
So, yeah, I think he should be banned, and banned again if he returns. But if not that, then throttle his posting volume and/or fix the "ignore" function such that it actually works.
Shadowcat is right. Simply ignore him, you do not even need to put him on ignore; but do not respond to him and do not create threads about him.
Others have tried and failed to bring cancel culture to TUSCL. Man of them are no longer here, nor do they deserve to be here. SJWs and the liberal cancel culture mob are the worst trolls. If anyone should be banned it is them.
I hope that, because someone tried to bring cancel culture to TUSCL again, that Founder sees that and never bans him. Cancel culture is amongst the worst liberal behaviors and must not be rewarded.
It's not this guy's warped views on things or the fact that I don't like him. There's plenty of people I disagree with and don't like here, but they don't bother me. I don't mind seeing their posts, even if they directly challenge my ideas on my own threads. I don't even care if they attempt to insult me. The problem with SJG is he hijacks the entire board with no other goal but to cause chaos and make the board dysfunctional.
Imagine if you owned a retail store and someone came in every single day for 3-4 hours, spends the whole time going from salesperson to salesperson asking questions and making statements that have nothing to do with your business or the product you sell, with absolutely zero intention to ever buy anything. On top of that he rudely cuts in line in front of legitimate customers who then can't get any service.
Another example: You own a radio station and some nut job finds a way to override your broadcasting signal so your listeners hear nothing but gibberish.
I'm 100% opposed to "cancel culture" where people are shut down because of their ideas, but that's not what this is. The guy is a disrupter and nothing more. He doesn't even have a discernible opinion on anything.
Even blocking everything SJGTHREATENSWOMEN has bumped, it's difficult to scroll past the block of ignored threads. I doubt I've looked at 3 pictures here, but aficionados of the picture forum say he's ruining that too.
He needs to be blocked, repeatedly if necessary.
I’m going to take this once in a lifetime opportunity to say I 100% agree with @mark. SJG was the first account I ever put on ignore. I also preferred the two way ignore but I respect founder’s opinion that he wanted the ignore function to be a shield and not a sword even though I disagreed in cases like SJG. It’s founder’s site. He’s given us multiple ways to isolate the trolls: ignore, hide threads, VIP and verified forums. Use any or all of those. Or better yet, don’t feed the trolls and find a better way to spend your time online by looking at tits.
Because troll feeding is fun. Do you really think Mr Damned wants Mr. San Jose banned? I suspect he just wants to fuck with Mr. San Jose and get a San Jose response for shits and giggles.
I do have a question though: what did Mr. San Jose say that was rapey? Was it really rapey or was it “Skibum rapey”?
“Skibum rapey” is when somebody that Mr. Skibum reads a post someone from someone he believes to be liberal and then has verbal diarrhea that is identical to SJW bullshit. You know, the Mr. Skibum “wah wah wah libruls be so hateful wah wah wah ur da real mysoginist wah wah wah” act.
Just asking because I usually get bored with Mr. San Jose’s posts about one sentence in and, let’s face it, many of you are snowflakes that are really easy to troll. I’m not saying that Mr. San Jose is trolling. In fact, he’s the least trolly person on here. He believes the shit he posts because he is 100% sincerely nuts. And you’ve gotta have at least grudging respect for his sincerity!
When it works. :D
In the case of this particular troll, it doesn't. Most trolls do it for the rise they get out of the trolled. This one is actually mentally ill; his brain doesn't work right, so he'll never get the point.
It would be nice if the "Ignore" option were back next to a user's name in the discussions, rather than having to click through to their profile page.
He says my posting intimidates people from "topical diversity" (i.e. posting on his threads), in which case I count it as a mitzvah.
It doesn't matter with him. I rarely read or even enter most of his threads anymore but I have entered some of his multiple post threads and the '0nly' poster in those threads is him, nobody else, yet he continues to bump and post in those threads. Not feeding him doesn't make a difference he just continues posting and talking to himself.
Blocked him a long time ago. On a very short list of users I blocked (maybe the only one?).
See all the rest of you complaining about him and reacting to him.
Shrug...