Someone got a little pissed about their review being rejected

I checked 'incoherent'.

I guess some people don't do well under-pressure

☺

I saw the original [actual] review he submitted. It was one paragraph filled with 'insider' references to dancers and PLs with a note to PM him for names.

Quite incoherent without direct access to a 'decoder ring'. Little usable club info. Seemed most likely to appear on The Strip Club List among personal rants rather than on USASG .

He got one thing right; according to his profile he's been on TUSCL since early 2000s. ☺

Tell him to PM me. I'll refund his money.

I read USASG but am not registered so I cannot post. I'd probably get banned quickly because I don't approve of them giving dancer names and even photos of the girls involved in gang bangs. I know the photos are real because I know one of the female participants. I think the senior members are pretty low life.

Bet I know who it was LMAO

Anyone who can't get a review published now on this site, especially with the new 7 adjudicator format and certain frequent approvers who never read a review they didn't like, has to be a Grade A fucktard.

As I've posted b/f - some guys think a review is for them and about them, vs to provide info for others - so they write reviews to just state what's on their minds vs providing useful info for others

Well, it’s nice to be validated that the review system is working then 😁

Shit bricks!

When writing a review, it should be done to inform others. It should be coherent, and it should be fact filled. It’s more of a reference work - than a creative writing assignment.

Sadly, some reviews are filled with odd references and few facts about the club. It is worse when a guy writes a shitty review and gets upset over rejection.

Everyone has a right to their opinion!

Only ONE has the final say, founder.

Actually I don't have any more say in the review process than you do.

founder,

I call BS! :)

i can’t find that usasg website. i’d like to take a peek at it. pm me if you want. thanks.

USASG actively promotes being as graphic as possible along with dancer names and pricing.

During a club crackdown a few years ago, I posted that people should tone down the details at least for the short term. I included a link to a local TV news report that featured a graphic post from USASG about a specific dancer and club.

My post was deleted by site admin and I was banned for 2 weeks. All they care about is ad traffic.

The review process here has mede me decide to no longer post reviews. I am sure no one cares, so it works out well for all. Watching this site deteriorate is sad.

What is wrong with the Review process here ? As long as people take the time to publish them, I think the process here works pretty good.

To each their own. Everyone who wants to post reviews should. I am no longer one of them.

As one who had a few reviews rejected by bonedin. com, I sympathize with the OP's frustration.

But rather than just rant about a rejected review I would rewrite the review and resubmit.

TUSCL's review system is not perfect but at least you find out why the review is rejected, whereas on bonedin. com they just deleted my reviews without a courtesy email.

After the fifth deletion I decided to delete my account.

I don't blame the OP, but the solution is to just not post reviews. Reviews are for others, not yourself and if others want to make it as hard as possible, then they can go to the club themlseves instead of reading what someone else thinks.

Ok. I don't do a lot of reviews (cause I don't club that much), but I like writing them, helps me remember the good times.