As I posted previously, TUSCLer is a data set (just happens to consist of T&A data) - as I posted previously, it's often beneficial to be able to see/interpret data in various ways - having ratings may not be the end-all be-all but it does serve as an additional way to look/interpret the data.
I think the user-community has recently spoken on behalf of ratings for the most-part - again, it won't be perfect, but previous comments many feel it's better than nothing.
@founder,
Happy new year to you as well there's nothing accusatory, and nobody's saying you have a plan to take over the strip club world, but there's nothing subjective in large numbers of folk consistently saying that a certain club is great and that certain business owners, and managers consistently hit it out of the ballpark, so again tell me how 25 great reviews, with only one or two sub par reviews are "too subjective" damn man!
You just can't resist playing devil's advocate.
The results speak for themselves, go ahead read the reviews for Follies, good review after good review, sure there are those anomalies that aren't as complimentary but over all I bet most fellas have a good visit most of the time, or use Tootsie's as an example, last few years there are a good number of folks saying it's not as great as it was, but still not bad overall, even going up to New England, large amounts of reviews are complimentary of Desires, I mean really, buddy, that's not being argumentative that's just recognizing reality. You can have your opinion and admit that a large amount of folks disagree with it, and not always looking to argue just go with it, sometimes the majority is correct.
Most sensible PLs will read the reviews to get a proper grasp of the clubs - the ratings just help narrow it down particularly in an area with dozens of clubs - I think it's too much to ask a PL to go club by club review by review - may actually be counterproductive
I can only think that you've been pressured by the clubs with poor ratings to not allow this sort? But in the end the site is not for them it's for users. And as has been said multiple times - clubs earn their rating. I would argue that any club with more than 30 reviews has enough of a sample for the rating to be accurate. And that is the basis of any search I do. Then I absolutely read the reviews to look for the specific information I'm looking for. Finally, on at least two occasions I gone to a club with a lower rating after reading reviews that indicate it's more our kind of place than higher rated clubs in the area. So, it's not just a highest rating gets the business. Honestly the elimination of that aspect makes the site almost of no use to me personally - I'm sure other feel different and if they're in the majority then no harm - just my loss.
But Founder changes the site every now and then and usually pisses of 3/4 of the user-base but with time the site is often tweaked to most PLs' satisfaction - and if not then most just live with it - it's TUSCL
Why does the layout of this site change so often? I find it hard to readily access the information I find the most valuable such as my Favorites and the day of the week that a review is based upon.
Founder likes to refresh the website every so often - sometimes we feel he misses the mark but he keeps on tinkering till it's better - I think it's pretty-good right now - sometimes it takes a little while to relearn where everything is or get used to the new/changed features but we time it feels like TUSCL business-as-usual (at least till the next change 😄)
20 comments
One person's 10 is another's 5.
I think the user-community has recently spoken on behalf of ratings for the most-part - again, it won't be perfect, but previous comments many feel it's better than nothing.
Happy new year, ya paranoid PL ;)
Happy new year to you as well there's nothing accusatory, and nobody's saying you have a plan to take over the strip club world, but there's nothing subjective in large numbers of folk consistently saying that a certain club is great and that certain business owners, and managers consistently hit it out of the ballpark, so again tell me how 25 great reviews, with only one or two sub par reviews are "too subjective" damn man!
You just can't resist playing devil's advocate.
The results speak for themselves, go ahead read the reviews for Follies, good review after good review, sure there are those anomalies that aren't as complimentary but over all I bet most fellas have a good visit most of the time, or use Tootsie's as an example, last few years there are a good number of folks saying it's not as great as it was, but still not bad overall, even going up to New England, large amounts of reviews are complimentary of Desires, I mean really, buddy, that's not being argumentative that's just recognizing reality. You can have your opinion and admit that a large amount of folks disagree with it, and not always looking to argue just go with it, sometimes the majority is correct.
😃
"Read the reviews of..."
That's what I'm hoping people will do.
P4P is often referred to as the oldest profession in the world and if it's lasted this long it must be for a reason.
NOBODY
Pressures the Founder
But Founder changes the site every now and then and usually pisses of 3/4 of the user-base but with time the site is often tweaked to most PLs' satisfaction - and if not then most just live with it - it's TUSCL