Big vs. Small
chandler
Blue Ridge Foothills
I keep seeing posts that disparage "big, glitzy clubs". I realized one thing the upscale clubs I like have in common is that they are not big. I hate those huge, cavernous clubs where the stage dwarfs the dancers, and you hear the DJ echo like you're in some sports arena. I'm not impressed by mammouth spectacle. I want things presented on a human scale.
On the other hand, I prefer a club that has enough strippers that there are likely to be several I'm attracted to. Even if I only spend time with one, I like having extras to play supporting roles and give me something to think about coming back for. And I don't want to have to hike around to different rooms to see them. So, I guess I like medium sized clubs the best.
On the other hand, I prefer a club that has enough strippers that there are likely to be several I'm attracted to. Even if I only spend time with one, I like having extras to play supporting roles and give me something to think about coming back for. And I don't want to have to hike around to different rooms to see them. So, I guess I like medium sized clubs the best.
13 comments
Not necessarily that they were big or small, but even the big ones had something vaguely "intimate' about them, at least in the VIP rooms. Clubs that are big ol' danged warehouses, whether they're glitzy or not, have failed for me.
Just a thought.
I've had really great times and really bad times in clubs of all sizes but most of my really great times have been in small clubs. Maybe because my both my #1 and #2 ATFs worked in small clubs.
I think I was spoiled because my ATF worked in a little place where laps were $10 and they were everything I wanted and then some.
if there isn't such a law, there should be.
another vote for medium,
dg
I usually like medium-sized clubs if they aren't too expensive. I'd put Brad's in that category and also Cafe Risque in Bristol, which are probably my 2 favorite clubs anywhere.