Earth Day 2019
Warrior15
Anywhere there are Titties.
Yes, today is the day that all of us are supposed to become environmentalists.
https://www.earthday.org/campaigns/endan…
If you read the article above, you will learn that unsustainable agriculture is now a prime culprit in the demise of the planet. So all you farmers out there, stop growing food for humans. We got to protect the insects.
In honor of Earth Day today, I think I will fill up my oversized SUV with gasoline, take a drive out to the country and try to find some farting cows.
Anyone else doing something special today ?
https://www.earthday.org/campaigns/endan…
If you read the article above, you will learn that unsustainable agriculture is now a prime culprit in the demise of the planet. So all you farmers out there, stop growing food for humans. We got to protect the insects.
In honor of Earth Day today, I think I will fill up my oversized SUV with gasoline, take a drive out to the country and try to find some farting cows.
Anyone else doing something special today ?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
48 comments
I'm flying to California.
then I’ll jump into my bad ass Prius and drive to tj.
No one is against the planet, dip-shit-member. It's the way that environmentalists get their message out is what I am making fun of. " Kill all the cows so that the insects can live". Maybe Thanos had the right idea. Just kill off half the population. But he probably shouldn't have stopped at 50%. He probably would need to go to 90%.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wt6IG1UB…
__________
No, you don't have your facts straight. That was 50 years ago and even then the bulk of peer-reviewed papers predicted warming.
Making AOC the "face" of climate science doesn't make any sense when the bulk of the research is done by talented PhDs who've devoted their entire life to getting the facts straight and contributing to the best peer-reviewed journals. Why in the fucking world would 97% of these scientists participate in some type of hoax or conspiracy? Any single scientist who disproves global warming in a convincing way would instantly become a celebrity. What possible motivation would they have to promote a conspiracy?
The 2% to 3% of climate-science deniers are invariable funded by the Kock brothers and the fossil fuels industry.
"They've been telling us for decades that catastrophe is just around the corner. "
______________
No, they've been telling you for decades that the CO2 levels will eventually rise to unacceptable levels. At 400 PPM, the CO2 level now is higher than it's been in 800,000 years on Earth (according ice-core measurement). Hurricanes like Sandy, Maria, Harvey and the fires in California are probably tied to climate change. This is just the beginning -- and as I said history will not be kind to the idiots who won't listen.
Again, what a fucking stupid thread.
You'll never have any offspring @Dougster. So no worry.
If you pollute I will dump a load in your basement
and papi. yes.
I am saving my energy and enthusiasm for what I hope will be an especially thrilling Uranus Weekend early next month.
________________________________
I was pondering how stupid that statement is.
Here's an analogy: suppose someone who's smoked cigarettes for 30 years dies of lung cancer. Can I prove that cigarettes killed him? After all, there are other causes of lung cancer. But there's overwhelming scientific evidence that smoking causes lung cancer and it's likely that cigarettes killed him -- but not proof. In the same way there's overwhelming evidence that rising ocean temperatures cause more severe hurricanes.
Pushing the analogy further, the tobacco industry tried for years to distort public perception about the danger of smoking in exactly the same way that the Koch brothers and the fossil fuels industry have funded a constant onslaught of misinformation about climate change. It's been a successful propaganda campaign for dipshits like you and @SkiBirther who don't read and can't think straight.
Also, vegetarianism isn't bad... don't go for the new age bs. Lots of ethnic cuisines have dishes meant to be vegetarian. If I was Thai or Indian, I'd never miss meat.
So let's get going on setting up coastal perimeters without development. Let's say, no business or residence within 5 miles of the ocean, and the area reverts to nature. After all, if we are so worried about the problem, this would be one of the quickest and easiest ways to start protecting ourselves from the future doom (12 yrs by some politicians).
_____________
LOL!
So tell us how you're going to find shelter for over 50 million people, one fifth of the population of the United States,that are within 7.5 miles of the coast, the hell with the cause, and do you know 39% of the US population lives within 62 kilometers of a low elevation area likely to be flooded at some point in the next 35 years.That's nearly 160 million people, and includes the 43 highest tax paying parts of this country.
It'll be cheaper and more effective to build flood walls, than move them all out of harms way.
Flood walls won't protect as much against stronger hurricanes.
My comment was tongue in cheek. There is so much talk about reducing our carbon footprint etc, but no talk about protecting against the perceived consequences. I am of the belief that we can't change our future impact enough to make a difference. If the talk was to change to protection, IMO it would become NIMBY.
I agree with Skibum, population control would be a better solution.
I have come to this point not via blog posts and news articles, but through direct interactions with climate scientists and engineers employed at US Navy and Air Force Warfare Research Centers, as well as "boots on the ground" engineers directly involved in maintaining the integrity of coastal facilities and bases.
They're a lot smarter than me. They overwhelmingly believe that it's a real thing and a real problem. Therefore, so do I.
I have come to this point not via blog posts and news articles, but through direct interactions with climate scientists and engineers employed at US Navy and Air Force Warfare Research Centers, as well as "boots on the ground" engineers directly involved in maintaining the integrity of coastal facilities and bases.
They're a lot smarter than me. They overwhelmingly believe that it's a real thing and a real problem. Therefore, so do I.
That’s the real fuckn problem.
I was talking to a fellow about "climate change" causing flooding in Miami Beach. Se posted a picture to me of the standing water. He made one mistake. His standing water was "surrounded" by concrete and asphalt. All around in his picture where nature ruled, ZERO flooding.
Yep, climate change for sure! :)