DUGAN.....I’m calling you OUT
Muddy
USA
I got beef with you. You want to take shots at my shitty Baby Dolls review. No problem, too easy. Meet me by the high school bleachers at 6 (right after I’m done fucking the cheerleader and remincing about my school days and all that)
That white suit is gonna be getting a little dirty.
That white suit is gonna be getting a little dirty.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
80 comments
FIGHT!
FIGHT!
FIGHT!
FIGHT!
...
You are need to make an appointment.
Rick's going to be busy.
Let's have a front room make out session.
She must be on her period.
@CC You are a nobody at TUSCL high. Hell your a nobody everywhere.
And yet, my threads consistently attract lots of comments and discussion.
--
Either that or you just say some stupidnshit that people cant help to respond to Beta Cuck
pistola = John
CC/DC = Brian
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n9huSs0g…
Or do I really want to know. Lol.
Sirdance is a f@ggoT
@Nicokeyes on TUSCL you're retarded when it comes to sex, relationships, and anything strip club related. You're a self admitted virgin and totally clueless about sex IRL. Plus you are an attention whore that needs the attention just like a special needs retard. The analogy completely applies to your TUSCL persona which was the context of your own question, retard.
Plus your inability to distinguish the difference between an analogy and supposed real life begs the question as to your real intelligence but that is OT.
And then again, I'm sure there are special needs girls at the top of their special needs classes so maybe you're right in a retarded way.
Lmao.
No mercy for short bus passengers.
@ sirdance my inexperience about sex says nothing about my ability to LEARN ABOUT IT AND GET GOOD AT IT.experience does not reflect learning ability , and ur act of equating the two reflects the poor quality of ur intelligence as opposed to being indicative of any of my abilities.
But then again, Molly (Claire) still had some social skills with her classmates in the movie and that is still where Nicokeyes is lacking on TUSCL.
Also you haven't proven that you are good at sex, relationships, or going to strip clubs based on anything you've posted to TUSCL. Nor have you proven to anyone that you have any amount of learning ability. This still makes you retarded at TUSCL high school.
Basically you are still lacking in BOTH experience and learning ability on TUSCL, making you still a retard. (And you're still a needy attention whore.)
From what I've read you've never demonstrated anything close to that you've learned anything with respect to those "subjects". Which still makes you a retard with respect to them.
But you called SirLap a “faggot”. It’s one thing for the middle aged crowd here who came from a different time period to casually throw around a homophobic slur. But when it’s 2018 and you’re among the intelligentsia of UT Austin, referring to somebody as a “faggot” is NOT acceptable. That’s not sweet at all.
^ LMAO this is code for being a passive aggressive bitch to everyone
...^^^why are U associating the fact that it hasnt happened with the fact that I don't have the ability to make it happen ?
- does ur dumbass easily assume that evereryone who has a million in the bank to get a wife wants to gst married rite now?
-bitch.please. I haven't done anything with men for logical and financial reasons. You really going to taunt a woman for not being "ready" when shes waiting for a certain time to do things?
-does me waiting until xyz time imply that I won't be able to.perform xyz ability during that time ?
-in conclusion , do not associate my choice of not opening myself up to romance as my inability to do so, since there are reasons I don't wanna get caught up in that rite now in the same way that someone who is rich and good looking doesnt automatically want to wife every girl that is open to him.
- and no, I'm not BRAGGING.I'm arguing against u equating apples and oranges. While it is true I haven't had a chance to show my ability , I am not BRAGGING AND SAYING THAT I HAVE THAT ABILITY. However , BY THE SAME LOGIC(LOL), you cannot make an authoritative conclusion about me not having an ability when I have not been presented with an opportunity that my body is comfortable with to showcase such an ability.
^ Why are you making a strawman argument?
I'm just saying you should DEMONSTRATE that you have any ability to learn. Just because you SAY you have ability doesn't prove anything. And LMAO I'm sure a special needs girl would say and think the same thing about herself as you do.
"- does ur dumbass easily assume that evereryone who has a million in the bank to get a wife wants to gst married rite now?"
Does your dumbass easily misunderstand my point entirely such that you make this strawman argument? By your own strawman argument "logic", that future millionaire would have a record of showing that he has the ability to make a million dollars. My point was never about actually having the million nor was it about actually using it to get a wife right away. Quit making assumptions about my points and then arguing as if I made your misinterpretation as if it's my issue, dumbass.
The issue at hand is that you can't simply read and comprehend what I said, again begging the question as to your "real" intelligence. But again, that is OT.
"-bitch.please. I haven't done anything with men for logical and financial reasons. You really going to taunt a woman for not being "ready" when shes waiting for a certain time to do things?"
^ Dumbass bitch please. None of my points were about what you've actually done with men. Again quit making strawman arguments.
Also it wasn't a taunt. You claimed you have this great ability to learn, you just saying that you have this ability doesn't prove anything.
Go back and reread what I really said and try not to bias it with what you ASSUME that I said, dumbass bitch.
"-does me waiting until xyz time imply that I won't be able to.perform xyz ability during that time ?"
^ Go back and reread what I really said and try not to bias it with what you ASSUME that I said, dumbass bitch.
"-in conclusion , do not associate my choice of not opening myself up to romance as my inability to do so, since there are reasons I don't wanna get caught up in that rite now in the same way that someone who is rich and good looking doesnt automatically want to wife every girl that is open to him."
^In conclusion, you are responding like a special needs girl on the short because you can't really read and comprehend what I actually said. Your entire response is an example.
Some logic man
U tried to make an authoritative statement in that u claimed I have a lack of ability to learn sex romance etc when there has been no opportunity for me to prove that I am able or unable.
As a result , the burden of proof has always been on u bc you are the one who initiated the claim lmao ..and ur only evidence is that I haven't showcased my romantic abilities.
Which obviously isnt evidence bc if I haven't showcased my abilities , you cant make an authoritative judgement.
Thnx for letting us know ur OPINION of my abilities , lol
1) equate apples & oranges by equating no opportunity to showcase an ability as having no ability
2) shift the burden of proof onto me rather than him when he initiated the claim about me, and that initial claim is the only claim that has been at discussion
...wants to criticize my intellectual abilities ?
lOL where is the police to arrest the ignorant?
I'm.here to refute unsubstantiated claims about me.
And nah..instead of skibums office maybe I'll go back to the senator's office.
To keep it simple ('cause you really got special needs):
YOU are the one that made the claim that you have this ABILITY to learn with respect to sex, relationships, and strip clubs. This is YOUR claim.
And to this point AND because it's a discussion about TUSCL as a high school which means our personas and posts here are the "truth", I simply asked you to provide a TUSCL post from you as an example of your ABILITY to LEARN. It has NOTHING to do with you actually doing it, to be crystal clear to your special needs head.
And to be even more clear, I have not read many posts by you that consistently demonstrate that you have any learning ability with respect to said "subjects". Most of your posts on these topics are you grandstanding about your OPINION on each topic. The LACK of them demonstrating that you have ABILITY to LEARN is my point, dumbass bitch.
So, just because you just SAY/CLAIM that you have this great TUSCL high school learning ability doesn't mean you actually do.
But thanks for sharing your OPINION on it, LOL.
And by the way this exchange itself and your dumbass replies is my own proof you are a special needs girl at TUSCL high school. ROFLMAO!
YOU are the one that made the claim that you have this ABILITY to learn with respect to sex, relationships, and
Nah..I said (maybe five times??) That I was not claiming any ability . my claim was never that I had an ability, but that you logically cannot say that I do not have such abilities.
^ Note that ABILITY is referenced, not once, not twice, but three times in the context of her LEARNING.
Then later Nicokeyes posts -> "Nah..I said (maybe five times??) That I was not claiming any ability . my claim was never that I had an ability, but that you logically cannot say that I do not have such abilities."
LMAO Nicokeyes makes my "burden" of proving that she's a special needs girl that lacks basic reading and comprehension skills and makes strawman arguments easy. I'll just coast off this simple proof until she provides another example supporting my points...that she's the TUSCL high school special needs girl.
ROFLMAO!
^ This post is worded and spelled like a retard.
I can't say anything when he doesn't respond to anything lol.
^ I NEVER made this point. I made a completely contrary point and clarified it multiple times.
^ Now you are agreeing with me that you are a special needs girl. Note that this is only the first time that I've seen you agree with my analogy.
^ A completely incomprehensible statement. I believe the term is a "run on" sentence.
1) equate apples & oranges by equating no opportunity to showcase an ability as having no ability"
^ Oh...so the girl wants to make more strawman arguments. You've had multiple opportunities to show that you have LEARNING ABILITIES. This point has NOTHING to do with you actually doing the thing that you are LEARNING about. This is exactly why you make a strawman argument. You created the argument yourself just because you lack the ability to actually read and understand what I said.
"2) shift the burden of proof onto me rather than him when he initiated the claim about me, and that initial claim is the only claim that has been at discussion "
To repeat again for your special needs head, it was YOU that made the initial claim. To quote:
"@ sirdance my inexperience about sex says nothing about my ability to LEARN ABOUT IT AND GET GOOD AT IT.experience does not reflect learning ability , and ur act of equating the two reflects the poor quality of ur intelligence as opposed to being indicative of any of my abilities."
^ Again this is YOUR claim, NOT mine, dumbass
"...wants to criticize my intellectual abilities ?"
Once again, I'm criticizing your TUSCL persona intellectual abilities. That you keep changing the context speaks volumes to my claim and also sheds light on your actual intellectual abilities but again that is OT.
"lOL where is the police to arrest the ignorant?"
^ LOL so says the TUSCL high school special needs girl, with her own proof in this thread!
LMAO!