OT- migrant caravan
vajmon
Love Canal
I have a sweet spot in my heart for the people of Central America. Several of my atf strippers hail from Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador. But IMO we can't take in everyone who wants to come here, like all those people in the migrant caravans. We already have enough emmanuel labor and too many problems with welfare freeloaders, anchor babies and MS-whatever gang members. But I also don't think we should be as heartless as Trump and turn everyone back. I say we only let in good-looking single ladies under the age of 25. Everyone else goes home pronto. Just to make things fair I say we apply that policy to immigrants trying to come here from all other countries too.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
32 comments
Not much out of Trump about the Caravan since midterm route. Caravanished.
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=w…
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.breitba…
Unpopular opinion here, but I don't think we should let any of them in. Or if we do there should be a rigorous process in an attempt to screen some of the criminals from the innocents.
And for those saying that they are seeking asylum, bullshit. They are already out of the country from which they may have a claim of persecution however specious that claim may be.
Many of these bangers were living, illegally, in South Central Los Angeles and for their own safety had to join the LA gang scene. Then, as many of them were arrested, they were deported back to Central America. So, where did MS-13 come from? It's our gift to Central America, exported from the US of A!
:-(
You realize there is a legal process for anyone claiming asylum right?
Sure have the interview at the border and turn tgem away.
The legal process or "interview" as you call it takes years.
He may be a drooling old man that tries to fuck fruit cups in the rest home dining room but he THINKS he’s an expert in immigration law. Let to old fella have his illusions! ;)
My info came from the US-born daughter of legal immigrants from El Salvador.
"For asylum applications filed on or after April 1, 1997, the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) states that the initial interview should take place within 45 days after the date the application is filed. A decision should be made on the asylum application within 180 days after the date the application is filed, unless there are exceptional circumstances. See INA section 208(d)(5)."
The current process is long, but it doesn't have to be. Do it immediately on the spot and send them back on their way.
Also it's "rout" not "route."
When you were looking up regulations did you see the one stating people have to be inside the US or at a port of entry before they can ask for asylum?
Q: Ok, what country are you from?
A: El Salv...
Okay, Bye.
???
You are being sarcastic, right?
Do you really believe illegal immigrants go to jail if they try to cross the border?
Do you really believe there aren't MS13 gang members causing mayhem in the U.S.? And I don't just mean in the prisons.
"Any immigrant convicted of an “aggravated felony” is ineligible for asylum. Asylum is a form of immigration relief available to immigrants who suffered or have a well-founded fear of persecution in their country of nationality or last habitual residence."
So are they elgible for Asylum? Fuck No.
This quote is true.
Now for my questions.
1. Do you really think the immigrants you are referring to will present themselves at the border and request asylum?
2. Do you really think they won't take advantage of the chaos to make their way across even easier than without the caravan?
3. Do you really believe these immigrants are seeking asylum due to persecution and not just for improved economic conditions.
Damn, you got me. I must be getting trolled.
Well played.