Old Reviews That Would Be Rejected if Submitted Today
s275ironmanDetroit
I think the voting process to approve reviews has certainly made TUSCL a lot better. We no longer see anything like the following show up in the Daily Reviews section.
Anyone else recall a review that was so bad you could never forget it, no matter how hard you try? Feel free to add links to them here.
Comments
last commentYeah thats egregious. Some garbage still gets approved but overall it is much better.
What in the entire fuck did I just read
outstandingly bad; shocking.
"egregious abuses of copyright"
synonyms: shocking, appalling, terrible, awful, horrendous, frightful, atrocious, abominable, abhorrent, outrageous......
There are some that are even more of an insult - i.e. the person that just writes 3 or 4 sentences of gibberish and then copies/pastes the same 3 or 4 sentences several times to make the review long enough not to get auto-rejected
It amazes me at how a person can assemble several unrelated words - then capitalize the fist letter of the first word - throw a period at the end - and call it a sentence! Some folks take those sentences - and call it a review. It’s bizarre!