tuscl
Loading...

Old Reviews That Would Be Rejected if Submitted Today

Avatar for s275ironman
s275ironmanDetroit

I think the voting process to approve reviews has certainly made TUSCL a lot better. We no longer see anything like the following show up in the Daily Reviews section.

/rev.php

Anyone else recall a review that was so bad you could never forget it, no matter how hard you try? Feel free to add links to them here.

Comments

last comment
Avatar for chessmaster
chessmaster

Yeah thats egregious. Some garbage still gets approved but overall it is much better.

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for PrimetimeSchein
PrimetimeSchein

What in the entire fuck did I just read

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for goodguy
goodguy

outstandingly bad; shocking.

"egregious abuses of copyright"

synonyms: shocking, appalling, terrible, awful, horrendous, frightful, atrocious, abominable, abhorrent, outrageous......

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Papi_Chulo
Papi_Chulo

There are some that are even more of an insult - i.e. the person that just writes 3 or 4 sentences of gibberish and then copies/pastes the same 3 or 4 sentences several times to make the review long enough not to get auto-rejected

0
0

Log in to vote

Avatar for Cashman1234
Cashman1234

It amazes me at how a person can assemble several unrelated words - then capitalize the fist letter of the first word - throw a period at the end - and call it a sentence! Some folks take those sentences - and call it a review. It’s bizarre!

0
0

Log in to vote

Want to add a comment?