ListingsWhat's NearbyReviewsWhat's NewTop 40ArticlesDiscussionsForumsUnpublished ReviewsUnpublished ArticlesLog Out
start a discussion

Old Reviews That Would Be Rejected if Submitted Today

avatar for s275ironman
s275ironman
Detroit
I think the voting process to approve reviews has certainly made TUSCL a lot better. We no longer see anything like the following show up in the Daily Reviews section.

https://www.tuscl.net/rev.php?id=318881

Anyone else recall a review that was so bad you could never forget it, no matter how hard you try? Feel free to add links to them here.

5 comments

Jump to latest
avatar for chessmaster
chessmaster
•
6 years ago
Yeah thats egregious. Some garbage still gets approved but overall it is much better.
avatar for PrimetimeSchein
PrimetimeSchein
•
6 years ago
What in the entire fuck did I just read
avatar for goodguy
goodguy
•
6 years ago
outstandingly bad; shocking.
"egregious abuses of copyright"
synonyms: shocking, appalling, terrible, awful, horrendous, frightful, atrocious, abominable, abhorrent, outrageous......
avatar for Papi_Chulo
Papi_Chulo
•
6 years ago
There are some that are even more of an insult - i.e. the person that just writes 3 or 4 sentences of gibberish and then copies/pastes the same 3 or 4 sentences several times to make the review long enough not to get auto-rejected
avatar for Cashman1234
Cashman1234
•
6 years ago
It amazes me at how a person can assemble several unrelated words - then capitalize the fist letter of the first word - throw a period at the end - and call it a sentence! Some folks take those sentences - and call it a review. It’s bizarre!
You must be a member to leave a comment.Join Now