The great Mileage debate...
poledancer83
Narnia
Mileage for me depends on alot of factors. Speaking to mileage without mentioning money and looks is like asking someone to explain buying a car without talking about looks or dependability. Thats the driving force behind it. But with those things aside a PL needs to be upfront and not the romantic i love you type. I personally dont want that from a PL. I would rather have someone that could be happy with hanging out and watching a movie or doing something fun and then top it off with mileage vs dinner dates and...dare i say it jewelry. As a side note dont ever buy a dancer jewelry because its gonna end up on a pawn shop counter very soon. The main point is for a PL to understand what is happening here. I dont mind what fantasy is in your head but understand in reality what the real outcome is going to be. The last thing a dancer needs is a stalker or a dozen roses every night at work. If a PL can make me laugh and feel like i am hanging out with a guy friend then mileage is def up from someone that reminds me of the nerd taking the homecoming queen to prom with all the awkwardness. Just remember you dont profess your love to the mcdonalds girl for a big mac. Its business you act normal pay and get the meat and special sauce... Same rules apply for strippers... Act normal and get the meat and expel your special sauce... Geez thats nerdy lol but you get the point. lol
36 comments
PL/stripper relationship= i love you for whats in your wallet
-->"PL/stripper relationship= i love you for whats in your wallet"
-->"If a PL can make me laugh and feel like i am hanging out with a guy friend then mileage is def up"
Which is true? Or are they both true? The 2nd statement certainly makes it sound like customer personalities -- not just "he's not creepy, and he has money", but things like whether he can make you laugh or put you at ease, can determine mileage. That sounds dangerously like a customer with a more fun personality might get more -- which is anathema to tuscl orthodoxy.
I will tell you my personal theory: they are both true. Stripper/PL relationship is a business relationship at heart. If there's no business, there's no relationship. But, just like with ANY service provider & client relationship, a provider can enjoy interacting with one client over another ... In my line of work, there are definitely customers I enjoy interacting with more than others, and those customers DO get extra benefits, within reason -- I genuinely like some customers, even though if the business relationship disappeared, I'd never talk to them again. That doesn't mean I'm insincere in liking that customer -- just that business relationships are different than personal ones.
I mean if you are a bank teller and a customer comes in, is there some blockage in your mind that says "no attraction hes just a customer"??
...
In my opinion, strippers/dancers are actually real people with real feelings and emotions. I dont see whats the big deal with a stripper actually liking a customer to the point of dating them.
No, law and psychiatry spring to mind.
I think she’s using it as an affectionate term.
Agree that a lot of strippers have dated a customer, at least once. Many of them swear off ever dating a customer again after that, but it seems to be pretty common they do it at least once. To really shock you, I've seen this same conversation on StripperWeb, and if I recall correctly, lots of girls admitted dating a customer once, even some of the cuntier girls. In all cases I know about, the guy was a customer first -- that is, the by-rote PUA advice that "once you're a customer, you can never be anything else" seems to be exactly the opposite of what happens (which doesn't surprise me, the PUA are just trying to sell an interesting story to the most gullible guys around). I've gotten to be FWB with a stripper more than once, and was always either her CFPL or ATFPL first.
That's SJG's entire theory. I don't think it's a big deal. If SHE genuinely likes the customer and comes on to him then cool. But for guys like SJG it's him convincing himself that whoever he picks out, all he has to do is treat her like a civilian, feed her cash, and initiate a front room makeout session. Afterwards she will immediately be willing to jump into bed with him for free afterwards. Funny stuff.
Poledancer83 one question: out of 100 customers, about how many do you meet that genuinely interested you enough to actually consider pursuing a normal relationship outside the club? My guess is, the ratio is quite low. Probably takes more than 100 customers to even find one lol.
There are certain dancers I find attractive/desirable but I don't bother w/ them b/c of their personality (GPS; low-mileage; moody; w/e) - similarly for some dancers the juice may worth the squeeze as some say around here - some dancers find it too-much work/trouble dealing w/ clingy/needy custies that want the equivalent of a GF (i.e. want/expect/think the dancer feels for them what they feel for the dancer)
Even with this all being a business relationship, we know that dancers will like some customers more than others, and customers they like can (and probably will) be rewarded with more mileage than those they don't. That's great! The best advice still remains: stay focused on the customer experience you're after, rather than worrying about what she's feeling, and if you continually have trouble getting the customer experience you're after, change something.
But yeah - that's good advice
My takeaway from all this: Every stripper is different. Every PL is different. But they're all human, to some degree anyway. Who really knows why a particular PL will be drawn to a stripper or vice versa? And in that extremely rare case where the attraction is genuinely mutual (more rare on the stripper's side of course), and not necessarily only physically, even especially not only physically, just maybe something real (beyond ITC fantasy) can come out of it. But you can't really explain it, it's complicated (yeah i know what i did...).
There might even be a PL that has none of these negative qualities, but maybe the dancer is already in a relationship and is self-aware enough to consider this PL "dangerous" not in a physical way or even a get in trouble at work type of way, but this PL is "fire" to her and she recognizes it and even despite hot and heavy sessions, she is in no rush or even reluctant to push things further and maybe even cull it back a bit. Just a hypothetical. As i said there are any number of reasons, a dancer won't want to commit a decent amount of time or energy into any type of relationship even ITC, even if it might make sense from a business perspective.
But from my perspective it is a mistake to get into a situation which is just money for sex.
I understand that sex workers have to do it this way, because that is how most of their clients think, and it makes it faster and more certain. But for myself I'm always going to use what devices are available to get the girl off script. Its in how I talk to her and what I talk to her about. I let her see right off that I don't perceive her as being any different from any other women. I don't discuss this, but it is obvious. Its just like I met her in a regular night club, or even in the super market check out line. I always treat all women as civilians, and in all situations.
And then if it can get intimate early on, when no commitments have been made, that is best. So in strip clubs its that front room makeout session. In AMP's its the early words and getting her DFKing.
To do that, both people have to get shifted from the sympathetic nervous system ( fight or flight ) to the para-sympathetic ( feed and breed ).
Now most action comes from the sympathetic. So this has to be different, just have to some how let it happen.
After this shift has occurred, the girl will be more reasonable about money. But more importantly, the money is no longer really buying anything. It is not being used to persuade her to do anything she would not be otherwise perfectly happy to do. So it becomes more like a civilian first date.
So the money is a show of care and concern, and of respect. It is what allows her to be able to be there, all dolled up and on call. Without that money, she would have to be doing some other job, like say a total waste, the finance sector.
So money is expected, but it is no longer seen as her primary motivation.
So this looks and service level issue, as I see it, it no longer really applies. The money has already started to become more like mistress maintenance, than fee for service.
SJG
In my work experience, I can’t give better treatment to some customers than others. I need to do a good job for everyone if I take on the work. It’s true that I like some customers better than others but there can’t be two tiers of service. There are customers I enjoy playing golf with or having a beer with. I wouldn’t want to socialize with some customers. But I can’t reserve better service for the golf partners or beer buddies because that of that. There are standards of competence that are generally in existence in business relationships, particularly professional personal service businesses, and one can get sued if one falls short of that standard. A doctor can not give a patient top notch medical care because they are friends and give so-so medical care to a patient who is not a friend. A doctor needs to get an “A” every time with every patient.
Strip clubs are different. It’s all masks and shadows to begin with and the relationships can be as fluid as anyone wants them to be. No one is going to sue a stripper if she gives a low mileage dance in a high mileage club. But what she is selling is the illusion of the relationship itself. As much as we TUSCLers like to act hard boiled, our feel good emotions come into play as much as our physical response. If we can handle it, we can enjoy that experience while clearly understanding that the illusion ends as soon as we are done paying for our dances.
Obviously, I can’t speak for how a stripper might perform for a customer she likes better but I think we can confuse ourselves at times when comparing the club experience to other business relationships. Yes, it is a business relationship. It’s very transactional. But it’s cloudier than that for everybody. If that wasn’t the case we wouldn’t have a discussion board here.
So you think they run on rechargeable batteries? Do they have built in reverse ATM machines?
SJG
Teachers also have to keep their hands off their clients ( in theory).
1. Money
2. Looks, a.k.a. would the dancer actually want to fuck you if strippering and profit weren't involved.
3. Everything else
Fair enough as a summary of 1000s of TUSCL posts. Is the debate part about whether or not it's "real"?
Very good post, very funny too.
Well, in TJ I plan to be taking putas to eat. I'll pay them something up front comparable to session money. Then they get more money when we actually do our session.
Mexico is a third world nation, and so the decent wage employment options for women are basically only two. But the money I give them would quickly be adapted into mistress maintenance, and then into a generous payment for her photo modelling session.
In the US, I don't think most strippers really need to be paid for dinner. But no matter, as I plan to be minimizing car keys and wallet dating. Instead want the modelling sessions behind closed doors.
But I think what you are really asking is if I treat strippers like civvies, am I also treating civvies like strippers? We had Ranukam here, a couple of GF's complaining, "Your treating me like a stripper.
Well what i mean is that I treat all women in a 100% civilian manner. Money is just a show of care and concern, and to clarify my ownership of the pictures we make.
On the whole though I still am not interested in conventional relationships. Building an organization which will change such things substantially. And the women I know will get inducted into it. The benefits for them are far greater than with any of the standard social options, like that nightmare known as marriage.
SJG
The Principle of Satan in Thelema
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pbi2acwV…
Led Zeppelin, 1969 Danish TV
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-WSbMW7…