Large breasted strippers

Yeah, the new inflatable implant is called the Dial-A-Mamm.

I saw on FOX NEWS today that there is a new implant available. It allows the user to change the size of her fake boobs by inflating or deflating

Cool. I'm always up for checking out tits.

I'll go find some pictures. :)

Not at all serious, Book Guy. Sorry for not adding a smiley.

I can't tell what you mean by wide and deep. I need pictures. I know what a crease under the tits is, and I'm fine with it. (A crease around the sides is another matter.) I'm second to no one in my love of flat chested girls, but with tits of any size, either there's some crease or they look disturbingly unreal, in my opinion. Too much gravity does bad things, but not all gravity is bad.

I'd rather see a swell than a shrink. :)

Now, are you serious about me seeing a shrink? I've been considering looking into diagnoses of ADHD (aka ADD) and depression, since I have a hard time "liking" my jobs and generally I don't give a shit if I have work or not (which, evidently, is somehow "abnormal" and therefore needs to be fixed... ?). But what does THAT have to do with wide breasts?

Book Guy, I've hesitated to say this before, but now I'm convinced you really need to see a shrink. Or, if you already are, you need to find a new one.

I would have to say I must also cast my lot with "wide" and "deep". That is to say, a very large portion of connection-area (across which the breast connects to the chest, does that make sense?). In other words, she is unable to hold a pencil under her breast. Dangliness of any form is worse, to me, than uprightness of any form. A crease under the breast is unattractive to me; the more of a crease, the worse. And narrow (left-to-right) breasts are unattractive to me; the wider, the better.

But then HEY! that's just me. :)

I have read that the favorite size, by men, is a 34B. My last ATF was a 36B and that was fine with me. I would rather have a 32 "A" than a fake 36C or bigger

I'm gonna have to cast my lot with "perky," regardless of size or enhancement. Just jiggly enough not to be too solid, just standie-outie enough not to be dangly, just large (or larger!) enough not to be male, etc.

I am also in the big and full natural crowd as well. Of course, everything else on her is probably big and full as well, but so what?

For me the big and full NATURAL ones are my absolute favorite. I love 'em sloping and hanging low cuz they're just so big and I love 'em standing up straight perky and full filling out the nipples to a plump round "suck me shape"! Anything augmented that can get as realistically close to the aforementioned is alright with me.
I HATE the far too full type that look like their about to rip or burst at any moment. They don't even jiggle they just riptide from left to right or up and down.
Boobs should be soft and supple not hard as a professional softball.
Knock 'em in my face if they're pliable. haha

The extreme tit freak show have become scarce, but meanwhile the number of implant surgeries nationally has gone through the roof. I'm a lot more concerned about all the more normal sized boob jobs out there nowadays than I ever was by the freaks. There remains this popular notion that surgery results in "perfect breasts", when anybody who has seen a few hundred bizarre outcomes in strip clubs knows otherwise.

DandyDan has a good point about the development of internet porn and its effect on general interests. In a related development, I read somewhere that breast-fascination was for submissive men (wanting the woman to be facing them, serving them, taking charge) while ass-fascination was for dominant men (putting the woman in a defenseless position and "taking" her). But then, it could all be reversed -- breast-fascination being something only dominant men could countenance, because submissive men would feel over-dominated by a woman servicing them, etc. etc. So I think it's all just excellent in whatever direction you point her. :)

I think the obsession with huge tits is more symbolic than actual, Maybeenuf4u notwithstanding. That is, men and boys get excited at the idea and the spectacle of awesome jugs. They're like comicbook superheroes - admired from afar, but kind of boring up close. When it gets down to the real deal, most guys find a woman with normal tits a lot more sensual to actually have sex with, or get a lapdance from. Once you learn that from experience, the appeal of huge tits seems rather juvenile. (My apologies to any actual juveniles who may be reading this.)

Actually, I think there may be a parallel with internet porn here. When internet porn was new, the big busty ladies ruled. After the internet revolution, the girls who most guys wanted to see on the internet were the girl next door types and the ones with super enhanced tits were downgraded in popularity. I'd have to believe something similar happened in strip clubs because when I first went in the mid '90's it seemed like every other one was enhanced and now, they look more naturally breasted. As far as I can tell, the local club I visit often has exactly 4 enhanced women there out of roughly 50 or so that I see the most.

you know I had an older stripper ld me in lv, Lacey Pleasure, as I recall, at the OG, now she had the kind of breasts I like, (> DDD!) and I gotta tell yeh, its a highlight of my sc career, I'm looking to repeat ASAP!

Where can I find em other then LV?

DougS: You joke, but in the French Quarter, along Bourbon Street, where approximately half the strip clubs are owned by the Hustler / Deja Vu chain, they have basically that situation.

Here's how it works. Deja Vu (the club itself) purports to be a "down home" feel, where the music is honky-tonk and country and the women are "girl next door." Hustler Club purports to offer a "rockin' exerience," in which the music is classic rock and the girls are more prototypical strippers (and, I would presume, your large-breasted types would congregate here). Farther down the street, Hustler Li'l Darlin's has a trashy / ethnic appeal, with rap music, and with more hispanic and black women. And finally, Hustler Barely Legal has smaller, lithe, petite girls, those who LOOK under-age; the music here is generally whatever pop music is currently in style.

At least, those are the theories. I prefer the appearance that they claim would be centered on Barely Legal, so I go there more often; and I dislike the experience (and the type of girls) offered at Hustler "prime", so I go there less often. But I've found, that a lot of the girls transfer from club to club, especially from Deja Vu to Hustler "prime," since they are directly across the street from one another. In the long run, the theory isn't necessarily brought about entirely in practice.

Sorry Maybeenuf4U, but I am only too glad that those hubba-hubba girls are not that common. I'm not a breastman, but I DO like breasts even though I find the really BIG ones to be a turn OFF.

Maybe when you enter a club, they should have a small interview process in which your likes and dislikes are obtained. Girls matching your desired "profile" could then be ushered to your general area both helping the girls make more money and improve your club experience.

Or maybe to make it even easier, the club could have small signs representing the different characteristics and traits of girls, such as body type, hair color, etc. Then, when you enter a club, you choose the signs associated with the traits you are looking for in a dancer, and display them at your table. The girls can then spot the sign display that most closely matches their characteristics and pay that customer a visit. [just kidding, of course]

It's my impression that the DD++ generation (women who chose to get that level of enhancement) was about fifteen or twenty years ago. This means that most people who have made that choice will be 15 or 20 years older than the "current" generation of dancers. So, they could be anywhere from early 30s on up to 60.

Of course, the DD++ enhancements are still a POSSIBILITY, they're just less common. I'm not sure if the prevalence of piercings makes up for the difference, as much as changes in the popular beauty ideal. Pam Anderson got hers done in the early 90s, IIRC, and that was "the thing to do" back then. A look at the popular porn stars from any given year will indicate pretty much what was in style for breast augmentation.

In addition, there's the issue of when saline versus silicone came and went. They were not readily available, then prevalent, then on the market, then precluded from the market, replaced, reintroduced, hidden, illegal but available, then back on the market, then off again, blah blah.

Where's the label that tells you what size they are? Maybe you could ask the manager if he has any bigger ones back in storage.

I personally don't think they dance any differently in terms of how good they are compared to anyone else. I think I would have noticed it before now.

It's my personal belief that super enhanced breasts are mostly an older woman thing, because the younger generation discovered nipple piercing and the other types of piercings women do.

Har. I'll post links to them in a new thread some day. Now I have a special errand for the rest of the holidays ... :) ...