Trump Fucking Russians
rockstar666
Illinois
OMG... TrumpTower conversations were recorded because of 'routine" CIA/FBI monitoring of Russian intelligence communications...he's going to be impeached eventually for this. He thinks his buddies doing the "investigation" will save him but it won't. Mark my words on this: It's going to prove fatal....what a cluster fuck.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
41 comments
I have no doubt that Russia tried to manipulate the election by obtaining embarrassing emails from the DNC and releasing them in a manner that kept them in the news. I also suspect that some people, like Roger Stone, had some communication with the hackers. I suspect there was no coordination. I think it was a bunch of amateurs blundering around on the US side.
There are many reasons that Putin/Russia would want Trump over Clinton even if Putin doesn't have anything "on" Trump. In fact, I doubt he has any leverage over Trump. But I also suspect that Putin hates Clinton as much as some TUSCL posters and felt that doing things to weaken Clinton politically would help Russia. I suspect he and other Russian analysts thought Clinton would win, so hurting her before the election would make sense.
And if Trump did win then Trump's inexperience would lead to the chaos we've been seeing. Which is still in Putin/Russia's interest.
So supporting Trump was win/win for Russian. And this is pretty non-brilliant. :(
Who knows whether his campaign actually had an effect. But even the fact that he tried makes him a traitor. He tried (and possibly succeeded) at prolonging a war that had become a meat grinder for both sides. And that goes way beyond non-brilliant.
Today we see the conservatives not all that upset that Trump is in bed with Russia. And the corruption in Trump's administration on this and other "investigations" makes Nixon look like a saint. Luckily, it's all going to hit the wall. I doubt Trump will still be president by Dec. 2018.
Lol!
There are Soros fingerprints all over the current undermining of the Trump presidency. Soros is even funding the organization staffed by most of the people from the 2012 Obama campaign, who are now working to oppose Trump initiatives as the, "Resistance." It is not a deeply hidden conspiracy theory that few could possibly find. It is a conspiracy - by Soros and a number of elite liberal globalists - to control the eventual direction of national governments and develop a one world, borderless economy. Soros is aware that his machinations are visible to anyone who bothers to look, and he doesn't care. As long as the MSM is overtly biased, and slants the news against anything libertarian, conservative or Republican, Soros' groups can work with the results.
So, "Follow the money" works - but won't stop the process because too many people are intentionally uninformed.
The FBI and Russia seems to determine who gets elected these days...I was always told it was the corrupt liberal media that decided elections...but since I read that in the media I suppose I shouldn't believe it...?
The "We already know the Russians were responsible for the DNC email hack" evidence is limited to statements made by political appointees at US intelligence agencies. No other source has asserted that any definitive proof exists.
We DO know that Russians were NOT responsible for the Podesta email hack. At least WikiLeaks is not alone in declaring that the Podesta emails came from a source with no known connection to the Russians.
We also know that all of the verifiable data listed in the "British spy" Trump report has been proven false. Information, to date unverifiable, like "Trump and the Russian whores," may not be proven false but is a little extreme even for the Tabloids.
The MSM proudly reported (first at NYTimes) on January 19, 2017 that surveillance of the Trump campaign did reveal conversations between a Trump appointee and the Russian Ambassador to the US. In the NYT "expose'" it was clearly reported that a federal investigation had been ongoing and electronic (and other) communications were monitored. The Times hinted at additional surveillance information. When Trump tweeted complaints about being "wiretapped," all of the MSM used words like "unfounded," "dishonest," and "wrong." The MSM insisted Trump was paranoid. And most readers/viewers seem satisfied that Trump lied about being "wiretapped" and the NYT report didn't happen. That fits my definition of intentionally uninformed.
You think???? Duh.....what a waste of time, liberal fags.
Full article: https://www.yahoo.com/news/cheney-blasts…
And again - not a wacky conspiracy theory - much of the hyperbola and attacks on Trump are clearly identified as originating from entities affiliated with George Soros, an individual who does not hide his desire to topple individual national governments in favor of a global economic control system (presumably with him and his friends as the controllers - but that is just my guess). Soros has worked to undermine several European and central Asian governments as well as influence elections in eastern Europe. It is not far right, or even a conspiracy theory, Soros is real and he is involved in US politics.
I still see a possibility of him getting bored with it and simply resigning or not running for a second term.
I know we're all posting on a website for deviants but which of us are "inane dolts" and which are "insane dolts"? Neither sounds aces but it looks like those are the two options.
And what is "dwqwqd"?
Father, "I don't know son; we're Republicans".
Young dinosaur to his mother, "Mother, does god exist?"
Mother dinosaur: "Not yet".