For the most-part although I tend to write excruciatingly detailed reviews, up to now I've tended to leave out the most "salacious details" for lack of a better-word; or at best hinted at them w/o being too-overt about-it.
Lately I've been "keeping it more real" and detailing everything that has gone down in my visit (the good, the bad, and the ugly; per se) - i.e. I've gone into detail about things that could potentially get a club in trouble if LE was actually taking the time to be examining TUSCL reviews and taking-action based on what's said in the reviews.
Thus up to now I've tended to leave out the dirty-dirty but have gone in "full-disclosure mode" in my recent reviews.
IMO for the most-part is kinda an open secret what goes-down at many clubs - I've been reading many reviews on here throughout the years of descriptions of what PLs have done in clubs and to the best of my knowledge I have not seen a connection b/w TUSCL and its reviews and the demise of a club per se.
So I'm kinda PL-torn b/w being coy in my reviews vs just "keeping it real" per se.
What say you - is TUSCL and "keeping it real" a "clear-and-present danger" to SCs - or are we being a bit too paranoid?
(I still feel putting dancer names in connection w/ extra-curricular activities should be a no-no though)


I'm torn too. I'd be even more torn if I was getting full extras.