The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms and was adopted on December 15, 1791, as part of the first ten amendments contained in the Bill of Rights.
Actually the right to bare tits is protected by the First Amendment, at least to a degree. Courts have found that topless dancing is a form of expression that is protected by the First Amendment and therefore cannot be outlawed.
It's a woman's body, and she should control the how's, when's, and where's of access to her body. That falls under the same constitutional rights that guarantee abortion, homosexual marriage, etc. This is one of the few issues that I agree with liberals on.
We agree on many things I believe, but when you state " It's a woman's body, and she should control the how's, when's, and where's of access to her body. That falls under the same constitutional rights that guarantee abortion, homosexual marriage, etc. This is one of the few issues that I agree with liberals on." that agreement is OFF!
I fathered my son and daughter. Had my wife wished an abortion, there would have been a major WAR. The child was as much mine as hers!
Bodily autonomy is firmly established in our law. The concept is best illustrated by looking at organ donation.
No one, no matter how dire the need, may force you to donate an organ against your will. Not even your wife, Clubber, could require you to donate a kidney when it's the only way to save her life. (Whether or not you'd willingly so is irrelevant to the topic of whether or not it's permissible to force you to do so.). Even after your death, no one may take your organs, again no matter how dire the need, without having secured your permission while you were alive.
So when you say that a woman doesn't have a right to an abortion without somebody else's permission, you're saying she has fewer rights to her bodily autonomy than a dead person.
Comments
last commentI think the right to bare tits should be protected by the First Ammendment. Freedom of Speech
Log in to vote
I just know the one that allows us to bear arms
Log in to vote
The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution protects the right of the people to keep and bear arms and was adopted on December 15, 1791, as part of the first ten amendments contained in the Bill of Rights.
Log in to vote
Duh.
Like we've never come across a spelling error on TUSCL.
Log in to vote
Actually the right to bare tits is protected by the First Amendment, at least to a degree. Courts have found that topless dancing is a form of expression that is protected by the First Amendment and therefore cannot be outlawed.
Log in to vote
I'm all for bare tits.
And our right to touch, feel and suck on said bare tits shall not be infringed.
Log in to vote
It's a woman's body, and she should control the how's, when's, and where's of access to her body. That falls under the same constitutional rights that guarantee abortion, homosexual marriage, etc. This is one of the few issues that I agree with liberals on.
Log in to vote
what about the right to bare back johns ds?
Log in to vote
Great insights, JS69.
Log in to vote
Spellcheckers suck!
Log in to vote
Epic fail
Lol
Log in to vote
Bare arms will send a woman to jail in several Middle Easter countries, but blowing up Jews seems to be okay with too many of them.
Log in to vote
None of them.
Log in to vote
JS69,
We agree on many things I believe, but when you state " It's a woman's body, and she should control the how's, when's, and where's of access to her body. That falls under the same constitutional rights that guarantee abortion, homosexual marriage, etc. This is one of the few issues that I agree with liberals on." that agreement is OFF!
I fathered my son and daughter. Had my wife wished an abortion, there would have been a major WAR. The child was as much mine as hers!
I'll accept your apology!
Log in to vote
Bodily autonomy is firmly established in our law. The concept is best illustrated by looking at organ donation.
No one, no matter how dire the need, may force you to donate an organ against your will. Not even your wife, Clubber, could require you to donate a kidney when it's the only way to save her life. (Whether or not you'd willingly so is irrelevant to the topic of whether or not it's permissible to force you to do so.). Even after your death, no one may take your organs, again no matter how dire the need, without having secured your permission while you were alive.
So when you say that a woman doesn't have a right to an abortion without somebody else's permission, you're saying she has fewer rights to her bodily autonomy than a dead person.
Log in to vote