Will women voters go for Trump?
Mate27
TUSCL’s #1 Soothsayer!
Illinois is barely going for Hillary with Sanders just a few % points behind her in that state's primary. With such a strong liberal base that normally votes pro-female issues, it seems like she isn't locking in the female vote. This is a trend in many other blue states where Hillary has a hard time garnering a large % of the primaries.
This leads to Trump possibly capturing the majority of the women vote. I don't think they trust Hillary as part of the establishment. She does well in red states, but during the November election she will likely have a hard time in those areas. I see Trump getting those liberal Blue state's women voters come November.
SJG, Rockstar, Nina, and several other anti-Trumpsters are in danger of leaving the USA come the end of the year! The women voters could possibly turn on their own party and hitch themselves up to the wagon that can help them achieve progress! The unthinkable is about to happen, and seeing a non-career politician take the highest political office on Earth just exemplifies how the USA is the greatest land ever! No other governmental entity can stake claim to such a unique and great story as this. Women unite!
This leads to Trump possibly capturing the majority of the women vote. I don't think they trust Hillary as part of the establishment. She does well in red states, but during the November election she will likely have a hard time in those areas. I see Trump getting those liberal Blue state's women voters come November.
SJG, Rockstar, Nina, and several other anti-Trumpsters are in danger of leaving the USA come the end of the year! The women voters could possibly turn on their own party and hitch themselves up to the wagon that can help them achieve progress! The unthinkable is about to happen, and seeing a non-career politician take the highest political office on Earth just exemplifies how the USA is the greatest land ever! No other governmental entity can stake claim to such a unique and great story as this. Women unite!
34 comments
Donald Trump keeps tempting me to break my resolution.
Lots of dancers are very conservative which does surprise me as they get as much government money as unemployed people do. I think they like strong men who will insult them, belittle them and attack intellectuals for the same reason many have a 'Daddy complex'. Trump's cult of personality works well on them.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OkSRJSUY…
hillary and trump are one in the same. insatiably greedy, lying, thieving, elitist limousine liberals who covet power over all else. not only do they both hate women but they hate people of color even more. especially hillary and those uppity negros that stabbed her in the back in 2008 when they put that oreo muslim in the white house instead of her. yeah she is frothing at the mouth for the day she gets to mete out some real payback i tell you what. and the donald, fucking democrat puts an (R) behind his name and now he is somebody. well a leopard can’t change his spots.
both trump and hillary are dangerous megalomaniacs who will bomb the fuck out of anyone who looks at them cross eyed. and if they’ll do that to someone in Kansas (not that either of them would ever go to someplace so backward once they were in office) just imagine what they’ll do to a bunch of colored wogs overseas. bush’s and obama’s never ending wars will seem like child’s play.
that brings me to bernie. an outsider we can believe in who voted against the war in Iraq. now it is true he did vote for every other military action during his 16 years in the House and 10 years in the Senate but that’s only 26 years on the public dole so technically he is still an outsider. and he is the best candidate to save us regular folk, especially the women and children, from the old perverted white males that have been ruling us for so long. now i know what you are going to say – but he is an old perverted white male who believes women want to be gang raped crackpot. yes, yes i admit it sounds counter intuitive but who better to save us from our old white perverted male overlords than our own old white perverted male overlord.
the bottom line is that Bernie cares and will lift us up and give us hope. i say don't give up on yourselves! just because society has shunned you and cast you out because of your looks, because of your smells, because of your laziness and because of your permanent dislikability....bernie honestly doesn’t give a FUCK. he LOVES you all exactly because you are the patsies you are. so give him and yourselves a chance. stop doubting and BELIEVE
WE REALLY CAN MAKE THIS HAPPEN IF WE ALL JUST STOP MASTURBATING TO PORN, GET DOWN ON OUR KNEES AND PRAY TOGETHER FOR ONE WHOLE DAY
***don’t do it for me. do it for the women and children
His favorability among women and moderates is awful. Hillary's is mediocre.
Why am *I* in danger? I'm not a Mexican or a Muslim... Does Trump now want to kick out all the half-breeds, too? If so I guess I AM "in danger," as you say.
Anyway, anyone with real political knowledge knows that if the general election ends up being Clinton vs Trump (which it is looking like), Clinton will slaughter him in the electoral college. She will probably win by over 100 points. It will not be a close race.
And very few Bernie supporters would have a sudden change of heart and abandonment of values to decide to vote Trump in the general election. Lmao.
The numbers seem to show Hilary only really does poorly against women under 29 yo. That isn't enough to sway the election to Trump. It certainly wasn't for Sanders in the primaries (who had support for many younger, under 30 yo voters). I agree with twentyfive.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_they…...
The women who might go for Trump are probably the married women, not single women. It was like that when G. W. Bush was running against Al Gore.
Remember with Clinton v G. H. W. Bush it was "gender gap".
But with Gore v G. W. Bush it was "marriage gap".
SJG
"I fear I am writing a requiem for myself"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPlhKP0n…
www.sciencealert.com/a-canadian-province…
I think a basic income guarantee is mandatory. Capitalism is what creates unemployment. And Cecil Williams and the people who run Guild Memorial United Methodist Church in San Francisco have got it right. Poverty is caused by social marginalization.
So a corollary is simply this, everyone wants to do well. They want to win the admiration of family and friends. So if they are not doing well, then there must be some social marginalization or disability at work here. But as the main problem is marginalization, then we should not talk about disability, as usually this just means more marginalization.
And of course it is absurd that people should be accepting psychiatric labels. These are just an extreme form of oppression.
So for there to be justice there has to be this basic income guarantee, or what amounts to cradle to grave welfare.
The typical person on welfare takes far less out of our economy than those employed do. And if the welfare recipient is not driving around much in a car, then they are treading far more lightly on the earth than those who senselessly burn up gas and dump CO2 into the atmosphere to do jobs which produce absolutely nothing which people need to live.
Now welfare takes money out of gov't coffers, but in the US welfare has never been more than 3% of federal expenditure. This is much less than corporate welfare and other expenses directed to the betterment of the middle class in order to maintain political allegiance, or to keeping the poor down. So welfare is a cheaper way to keep our society going than the present state of affairs.
And then as far as federal accounts, it is the federal gov't which controls the printing press, the furnace, and interest rates which multiply the availability of money by the inverse of the interest rate. Suffice to say, federal accounts and the money supply are all under gov't control, hence it is artificial. It is just a matter of who and what are being served by it.
So as those who are not doing well are simply the victims of social injustice, we must redress this social injustice.
1. Stop using psychiatric labels, learning disability labels, or morality labels.
2. Offer people value producing work, not nonsense just to get a paycheck.
3. Provide this cradle to grave welfare system as efficiently as possible, and understand that everyone wants to be a useful and meaningful part of our society.
4. Follow my recommendation and hold parents accountable for exploiting their children, using them to give themselves a adult identity. This amounts to psychological child abuse. So besides criminal prosecution where practical, also prevent disinheritance and offer something like a divorce from one's parents when their is parent v child animosity. Make the parents pay, and pay dearly. Make it so that child exploitation no longer pays.
5. And for those who insist on calling the poor lazy or immoral, know that this is how Capitalism works. It is the family where this starts, with the designation of a child as the blacksheep. Those who denigrate the poor are just doing what their parents did to them. So the poor and marginalized need to start standing up for themselves rather than submitting. They and all of us must start engaging in public advocacy and non-violent civil disobedience.
6. And then since the New Economy and Libertarianism are really just the old Social Darwinism and Eugenics Movement, saying that the poor are not fit to compete, we all need to be prepared to do more than just be non-violent. We don't want to be like Anne Frank's father, hiding in an attic waiting for the Gestapo. We need to be ready to engage in guerrilla warfare, the use of lethal force, and without taking prisoners. Unless we are willing to do this, then we are helping the eugenicists who say that we are not fit to live. Gandhi and Jesus lived in violent revolutionary times. They were only able to accomplish their works because others were maintaining the constant threat of lethal violence on a large scale.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerrilla_warfare
SJG
"I fear that an writing a requiem for myself"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sPlhKP0n…
www.sciencealert.com/a-canadian-province…
I think a basic income guarantee is mandatory. Capitalism is what creates unemployment. And Cecil Williams and the people who run Guild Memorial United Methodist Church in San Francisco have got it right. Poverty is caused by social marginalization.
So a corollary is simply this, everyone wants to do well. They want to win the admiration of family and friends. So if they are not doing well, then there must be some social marginalization or disability at work here. But as the main problem is marginalization, then we should not talk about disability, as usually this just means more marginalization.
And of course it is absurd that people should be accepting psychiatric labels. These are just an extreme form of oppression.
So for there to be justice there has to be this basic income guarantee, or what amounts to cradle to grave welfare.
The typical person on welfare takes far less out of our economy than those employed do. And if the welfare recipient is not driving around much in a car, then they are treading far more lightly on the earth than those who senselessly burn up gas and dump CO2 into the atmosphere to do jobs which produce absolutely nothing which people need to live.
Now welfare takes money out of gov't coffers, but in the US welfare has never been more than 3% of federal expenditure. This is much less than corporate welfare and other expenses directed to the betterment of the middle class in order to maintain political allegiance, or to keeping the poor down. So welfare is a cheaper way to keep our society going than the present state of affairs.
And then as far as federal accounts, it is the federal gov't which controls the printing press, the furnace, and interest rates which multiply the availability of money by the inverse of the interest rate. Suffice to say, federal accounts and the money supply are all under gov't control, hence it is artificial. It is just a matter of who and what are being served by it.
So as those who are not doing well are simply the victims of social injustice, we must redress this social injustice.
1. Stop using psychiatric labels, learning disability labels, or morality labels.
2. Offer people value producing work, not nonsense just to get a paycheck.
3. Provide this cradle to grave welfare system as efficiently as possible, and understand that everyone wants to be a useful and meaningful part of our society.
4. Follow my recommendation and hold parents accountable for exploiting their children, using them to give themselves a adult identity. This amounts to psychological child abuse. So besides criminal prosecution where practical, also prevent disinheritance and offer something like a divorce from one's parents when their is parent v child animosity. Make the parents pay, and pay dearly. Make it so that child exploitation no longer pays.
5. And for those who insist on calling the poor lazy or immoral, know that this is how Capitalism works. It is the family where this starts, with the designation of a child as the blacksheep. Those who denigrate the poor are just doing what their parents did to them. So the poor and marginalized need to start standing up for themselves rather than submitting. They and all of us must start engaging in public advocacy and non-violent civil disobedience.
6. And then since the New Economy and Libertarianism are really just the old Social Darwinism and Eugenics Movement, saying that the poor are not fit to compete, we all need to be prepared to do more than just be non-violent. We don't want to be like Anne Frank's father, hiding in an attic waiting for the Gestapo. We need to be ready to engage in guerrilla warfare, the use of lethal force, and without taking prisoners. Unless we are willing to do this, then we are helping the eugenicists who say that we are not fit to live. Gandhi and Jesus lived in violent revolutionary times. They were only able to accomplish their works because others were maintaining the constant threat of lethal violence on a large scale.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guerrilla_warfare
SJG
Beethoven's 9th
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t3217H8J…
Sad thing is, if he was actually running this year, I'd vote for him as the best Candidate... and he's been dead for a long time.
She can have that job as President. Anyone in their right mind wouldn't do it. But I guarantee she will make voting for her almost as ridiculous as voting for Obama, then we can blame everything on Hilary. "Thanks Hilary!"
But like em or hate em, Trump is the ultimate bullshit artist, the kind of prick who will take any and all positions to advance his own agenda. The latest thing is blaming Hillary for Bill's infidelity:
http://www.people.com/article/donald-tru…
As avid TUSCL'ers (and speaking as a dude who regularly cheats on his wife) we all know that men with power and/or money have absolutely no self-control over their genitals and their animal instincts. Men are dogs. Hillary was a victim, not an enabler. If I were a women, the attack on Hillary for for Bill's infidelity would be the ultimately slap in the face.
No Meat72,Trump will not get the vote from women -- not even close. LOL!
REUTERS ROLLING: HILLARY 41.3%, TRUMP 40.0%...
Never believe those who live sheltered lives inside an urban population. I've always said some of the most ignorant people are those righteous leaning liberals who think they are so in tune with human rights. Once you get out of that bubble of thinking you realize that the biggest human right is getting up and working hard every day, which most of middle America and hard working women can relate to, especially when you're running a household. The women who voted for Trump probably know how hard it is to manage successfully, and if you have a family you'll always be criticized. Looks like the Clinton supporters failed to realize the "Me first" attitude doesn't work for the whole population.
Meat72, congratulation on your call! More women voted for Republican than in previous elections, because they understand the importance of leadership. Clinto didn't have the leadership that women wanted to see.
Others were saying it was the Hispanic vote that would stop him.
Can I still fuck your wife like you offered a few weeks ago?? Just kidding...
to all the naysayers, when this whole thing started, no one said trump was viable. fast forward to today.
REUTERS ROLLING: HILLARY 41.3%, TRUMP 40.0%...
myself and my gf voted for him, so naysayers, a big middle finger to you!
Turns out I am. Glad to have the silence back, and the noise from crying has subsided.
I'm glad Trump won. I had my doubts and still do about him but I think he will be a far better president than Hillary would have been. I'm not completely surprised the polls are wrong. If you only poll the poorest people without caller id, I believe you are bias in your counts toward democrats. I never answer the phone anymore like countless other Americans because the do not call list doesn't work anymore and all I mostly get are scam calls and people breaking the law. Our government has abandoned us as far as enforcing a do not call list in my opinion. I've filed complaints against dozens of callers. I still get these stupid calls every week. I can only block 30 numbers on my current phone and the numbers called from keep changing every week. I didn't want t get my hopes up too much though.