"Many people don't realize that a property owner doesn't need a reason to eject a person from that property."
Not quite.
As long as the reason doesn't violate any civil rights laws they (as a public accommodation) can eject someone who is a threat to their business and/or the patron & employees inside. This case certainly qualified as reasonable and not in violation of the law.
Comments
last commentMany people don't realize that a property owner doesn't need a reason to eject a person from that property.
Log in to vote
She can come to my place for some OTC. You are right, george. It's their property to do with what they want.
Log in to vote
I've always wondered what gives bouncers the right to get physical with peaple.
Log in to vote
"Many people don't realize that a property owner doesn't need a reason to eject a person from that property."
Not quite.
As long as the reason doesn't violate any civil rights laws they (as a public accommodation) can eject someone who is a threat to their business and/or the patron & employees inside. This case certainly qualified as reasonable and not in violation of the law.
Log in to vote