"Many people don't realize that a property owner doesn't *need* a reason to eject a person from that property."
Not quite.
As long as the reason doesn't violate any civil rights laws they (as a public accommodation) can eject someone who is a threat to their business and/or the patron & employees inside. This case certainly qualified as reasonable and not in violation of the law.
4 comments
Latest
Not quite.
As long as the reason doesn't violate any civil rights laws they (as a public accommodation) can eject someone who is a threat to their business and/or the patron & employees inside. This case certainly qualified as reasonable and not in violation of the law.