What's the policy when reviews mess up details, but the review is obviously intended to be truthful and gets it 90% right?
Specifically, a review of Cheetahs here cites 20 dollar lap dances. There are two Giant signs saying dances are $10. Some girls only do 5 for $100 VIP, but the reviewer clearly was mistaken (hey, booze happens)
It doesn't seem worthy of flagging. Maybe I'll just update my own review?
Is there a distinction b/w floor dances and lap/private/VIP dances at this club?
Perhaps he was ROBed and told by the dancers the dances were $20?
Well John, the dances were $20, and then they came up with $10 dances, but the girls said they were air dances, so I decided the heck with that, and just paid $20. Plus I have a fav, and she deserves $20 anway
There's no floor dances. It's possible girls were trying to ROB him, despite the posted sign. The VIP pricing can be variable (although 5 songs/$100 is really the max, other girls either do more songs or occasionally bargain down to $80/70
Just because a sign says $10 doesn't mean a dancer didn't succeed at charging $20. As papi said, you could prop it with your correction.
I appreciate corrections in props, both to my reviews and to others. I'm not a big fan of the prop/flag dynamic, I'd rather see something like a rating or a helpful/not vote along with a comment but the prop comment does work. There's a few where there's little conversations of props.
I was corrected in one and figured out I was paying a cover when it wasn't needed. It was a literally a $1 error, but the point was appreciated none the less.
Correct it via a Prop comment vs a flag