Don't Piss Off "Feminists United"
JohnSmith69
layin low but staying high
Sad too because the song in question was obviously designed to promote safe sex. I wonder what these young ladies would have to say about tuscl posts.
http://dailym.ai/1Dg8Q1j
http://dailym.ai/1Dg8Q1j
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
32 comments
Who found a dead whore in a cave.
Even though she stunk,
Look at the hunk
Of money that he saved.
The case of the frat boys over in Oklahoma is far more pernicious. Chanting about hanging n......s from a tree is hate speech and thoroughly repulsive. Two of the kids were expelled from school, which may be a first amendment violation, and I'm just fine with that.
I was at the Masters golf tournament when the Women's organization WOW was picketing Hootie (Masters Club Chairman - sometime in the 1990s) about having the club excluding female members. My friend was a crusty, opinionated, troublemaker and he took the WOW Mission Statement directly to the protesters. He rewrote the mission statement and substituted "Men" for every time it was scripted "women". He found several "butch" ladies to read his revisions to and they were all appalled at his chauvinism and how dare him to have such an attitude about women. We had to rescue him before he was stoned by the crowd. Come to think of it, he was damn near stoned before he attempted the stunt.
To me:
The first rite of Spring has always been the Master's Tournament.
If you don't know these "Truths" or have not heard of them, look them up. I think they are impossible to refute. One might disagree, but that's as far as one could go.
And yes of course beautiful women can be feminists. But sadly the more extreme feminists have tainted the word so a lot of women are reluctant to identify themselves as such. Just as in politics and religion, all it takes is some very vocal extremists (the vocal minority) to ruin it for others who are aligned in the same camp, but don't share their extremist views.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia;
Sex industry
Main articles: Sex industry, Feminist views on pornography, Feminist views on prostitution and Feminist sex wars
Opinions on the sex industry are diverse. Feminists are generally either critical of it (seeing it as exploitative, a result of patriarchal social structures and reinforcing sexual and cultural attitudes that are complicit in rape and sexual harassment) or supportive of at least parts of it (arguing that some forms of it can be a medium of feminist expression and a means of women taking control of their sexuality).
Feminist views of pornography range from condemnation of pornography as a form of violence against women, to an embracing of some forms of pornography as a medium of feminist expression.[106][107][108][109][110] Feminists' views on prostitution vary, but many of these perspectives can be loosely arranged into an overarching standpoint that is generally either critical or supportive of prostitution and sex work.[112]
Now while yes, such Feminists would object to any forms of discrimination or persecution against women, this does not mean that they are against men, against sexual relations with men, or against women serving in sexualized roles. On the contrary, they defend the right of women to do this without being subject to negative judgment.
So when people like PUA's and MGTOW's criticize feminists, they are just completely off base.
SJG
Where would I fit in? I am hard right on many issues, but not so much on others, mostly social.
Bottom line, problem is, to pigeon hole a person is damn near impossible.
lopaw,
Your opinion on Indiana, since it is in the news? I would think we might agree.
Of course I think that it's ridiculous, and they deserve the backlash that is burying them right now. Where do you draw the line? If I am a Muslim who hates Jewish people, I can refuse service to them? If I'm a business owner and a KKK member, then I don't have to serve blacks? It is selective discrimination, pure and simple.If you have deep feelings against any group of people (that have done no harm to you) and if those people might want to use your services, then you have a choice - either serve everybody equally and graciously as a business owner, or STAY THE FUCK OUT OF BUSINESS. The line between church and state is constantly being challenged lately, I believe it is a last ditch effort of those continually seeking to eliminate the rights of others, especially in light of all of the gains that gay folks have made in the legal marriage department.
Understood. But, there is a flip side. Let's use a real case. The bakery that didn't wish to supply a wedding cake. The couple could have gotten a wedding cake any number of other places. There purpose was to force someone to go against their religious principals, and not just get a wedding cake. That is wrong.
Sort of like the first amendment, the freedom of speech part. Try using that if you yell "FIRE" in a crowed theater. Same principle. Rights can be wonderful OR they can be abused.
Off soap box. :)
There's still a long way to go...
tolerance when it favors the left is fine but extending the same to others seems beyond the pale
"First They ignore you, Then they laugh at you, Then they fight you, Then you win." (Ghandi)
It's a different case than the same sex marriage wedding cake....the baker has to provide service and if he wants the customer to but the images of a same sex couple on top, that's fine. But he can't refuse to bake the cake just because they're gay.
So if it is a small town with only one bakery, all gay weddings are off? In fact, all of a small town would become gay free if a business refuses to serve a gay person. One grocery store? One gas station? Perhaps a way for a "gay free" zone, eh?
Don't ask, don't tell?