• discussions >
• Front Room

A Compromise Proposal

I probably should know better, but I'm going to try and broker a compromise for including an acronym in the glossary for cumming in your pants during a lap dance.

There is of course strong disagreement over the propriety of adding LDK to the glossary. The pro LDK contingent claims that the term is so widely used and recognized by most veteran members that it has already obtained de facto glossary status. They also tire of the continual posts from newbies asking "what's an LDK"? The anti LDK group seems divided into two camps. The first, which I perceive as the largest, contends that cumming in your pants is a juvenile activity that is too pathetic even for a self proclaimed groups of PLs, and wishes to avoid the stigma of according such a term glossary status. The second group seems to have no problem with the underlying activity itself, but questions the logic of the term which uses a person's fake initials to refer to a quasi sexual activity.

The first step in trying to reach a compromise is to recognize that despite these differences, the things that unite us are stronger than the things that separate us. While we may disagree over the method used to achieve orgasm, we all seek a degree of sexual satisfaction from beautiful naked women that goes beyond what any other PL can hope to accomplish ( at least any PL that doesn't have millions of dollars). We are united in the determination not to leave the club with blue balls. We are one in the quest to develop the ultimate system for sex with cute women at will far beyond what any PU can even claim in his dreams. Since we have such critical goals in common, we should be able to overcome this minor dispute. We can rise above it.

Next, we should try to understand one another. For the pro LDK crowd, you've gotta admit that paying a girl to rub on your pants until you cum, and then walking around with sticky pants, is pretty damn high on the pathetic scale. Indeed, while I used to LDK occasionally before I met the DS, I was always a little embarrassed of it. Who wouldn't feel some shame having to share a bathroom with a troll while you clean up the same mess your mom found on the sheets when you were a teenager.

For the anti LDK crowd group 1, try having some empathy. You may be a big stud who fucks hot strippers every week, but not everyone can do that. Some guys don't want to cheat on their wives/gf that way. Some can't afford more than a few lap dances. Some just don't have the money, or don't live near a club with extras. Don't judge a brother PL just cause he's not as blessed as you.

For the anti LDK crowd group 2, I know that the lap dance king can come across as the most pathetic of the biggest losers, but we are all PLs deep down. It's all just a matter of degree. Give the king a little respect, after all he has humiliated himself for years in pursuit of his single minded goal. At least admire his passion and commitment. Plus, it's not like we're giving him the Nobel prize or anything. It's just a glossary term.

Lastly, it's about fucking time that we agree upon something other than the fact that Jerikson is either a woman or a gay man. And that we hate ROBs and stripperweb dancers. Surely we can have more unity than just that.

The bottom line, whether you do it or not, or whether you like it or hate it, is that PLs are sometimes gonna cum during a lap dance. This activity is common enough that it needs an acronym. It gets referred to here almost daily, and we can't all type posts as long as SJG and JS69 sex stories. We need acronyms to keep postings shorter.

Ok, now that we're feeling all warm and fuzzy inside, here is my suggested new definition for the glossary. I have tried to keep it as short and succinct as I could, while still including language to pacify all viewpoints.

CIP (Cum in Pants). To ejaculate from friction during a lap dance with no extras. This activity is also referred to by some as an LDK in honor of the TUSCL poster lapdanceking82 who was a tireless advocate of this practice.