The Duke of York likes 'em young

More (and much earlier) info...

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1363444…

Epstein's philanthropy seems cool -- dude digs science, etc. But c'mon with the underage shit. 18 is the legal age in Fla USA...stick to 18+ only my pervert bros. I mean really, if I had Epstein money I'd probably have a bevy of chicks lounging around naked, ready and willing to give me a "massage" whenever I want. But they'd be 18-25...certainly NOT any younger.

Shit thought it would be a thread about me...my new gf is just over 21

I don't know about the Prince but I've read about Epstein before. He was flying underage girls to his mansion from other countries. He was convicted but got a slap on the wrist. If he lived in a trailer park instead of a multi-million dollar estate, he would be doing a life sentence.

He's a complete muppet and as much as I am a royalist I have no time for him, he's the ultimate freeloader. However I find it hard to believe this is true.

Yeah, I've never understood the attraction to young and underage girls. I'm kinda the opposite. Give me a hot, sexy, nasty, and very experienced MILF with a curvy body and big ol' tits any day.

Give 'em 10 years in the electric chair.

@londonguy...what makes Andrew worse than the others, in your opinion?

@jerikson40...I understand the appeal of younger but LEGAL chicks. Living like Hugh Hefner definitely appeals. I just don't understand why Epstein had to push it.

In America we've decided as a society that people can make up their own minds about their life at 18. There are no doubt plenty of 18-20 year olds that would gladly hang around naked with Epstein and give him all the "massages" he wants, in exchange for a generous allowance. Everybody goes into that relationship with their eyes open. Everybody gets what they want.

The dude is scum.

I can't believe I'm in agreement with j'40

I don't find the attraction to underage girls either. All of my favorites have been in their late 20's. Still relatively young, but certainly legal.

Unlike londonguy, I am not a royalist. It really picks my ass that the British Queen is the titular head of state of my country.

What a dysfunctional family she and that creepy Greek that she married have foisted on the world! She is leaving that nutty tampon sniffing Chuckles in line to be the next monarch. Randy Andy is simply a dimwit with the IQ of a piece of celery. Annie belongs in the stables of the horses that she loves so much. She has spent so much time with horses that she has become horse-faced herself. Young Eddie is just a non-entity (even though he did have the good sense to marry a Canadian).

Things don't look very promising for Lilibet's grandkids either - party loving crypto Nazis.

Art,

Not a fan of the Royal family, eh? Lol

I don't have a horse in the race, but thanks for amusing post.

@ zipman - it's because he does NOTHING of any use whatsoever and has never done so. His nickname is 'Air Miles Andy' over here because all he does is fly around the world as an unofficial trade envoy. Twat.

@ Art, did you remember to send them all a Christmas card last year :-). I can't disagree that they are dysfunctional, however I think in that regard we are entering a new era. By the way just like in Canada and other such places she is also head of state in our country in name only.

BTW, Art is right about Edward, he does FUCK ALL as well.