You would be in favor of banning discussion topic posts from folks who have no reviews to their credit? Lately, getting under my skin and too often smells of troll shit....
As a personal belief I am opposed to any form of banning speech unless there is a soldi and compelling reason. Just because a jerk is too lazy or uniformed to give us reviews, is no reason to ban him. Just put him on "Ignore" until he grows up and contributes.
While "banning" anyone is against a constitutional principle here at tuscl, being a leech is likewise against what this place is all about. We should not help people who refuse to contribute by taking the minimal effort of posting some decent reviews.
I find ignore works pretty well for the Trolls. For the other ones, I don't think its that big a deal for them to start a discussion. Occasionally, people get a little too greedy but for the most part I don't have a problem with someone's first post being a discussion rather than a review.
Ah, shit, please don't ban me! It's not a lot of fun here in the nursing home, ya know. It's hard enough posting with arthritis and all...and then nurse jackie wouldn't let me read tuscl while changing my diapers. She says the site is misogynistic crap but, of course, I know better!
Let everyone post. Why should I care about if they posted reviews? We have lots of contributors who are experienced mongers who are still complete idiots, and some with no reviews are actually interesting.
I'd like to ban the posters who make childish, stupid, I voted for Obama moronic comments about other posters. Accept the fact that if you are doing so, it means you really have issues.
Vague reviews which talk about "high mileage" or OTC, are not very helpful. But detailed reviews which talk about FS-ITC, could hurt the clubs.
On Red Book we gave no specific info about walk in AMPs. We only got detailed with the AAMPs, which require you to book an appointment to get the address. No harm ever occurred to an AAMP or an RA because of this. When LE struck, they never connected the address to RB.
But with an SC, LE or angry neighbors could use the reviews to make trouble. So I am not clear as to the best way to proceed.
I think most important is to start talking in general about good GFE-FS, versus the extras model, extras-FS, and all the things which make a place a clip joint.
I'd like to ban the posters who make childish, stupid, I hate Obama moronic comments about other posters. Accept the fact that if you are doing so, it means you really have issues.
14 comments
The TUSCL discussion board is like the old west. All free and shit.
But with occasional KFC ads. But you probably think those are troll shit.
On Red Book we gave no specific info about walk in AMPs. We only got detailed with the AAMPs, which require you to book an appointment to get the address. No harm ever occurred to an AAMP or an RA because of this. When LE struck, they never connected the address to RB.
But with an SC, LE or angry neighbors could use the reviews to make trouble. So I am not clear as to the best way to proceed.
I think most important is to start talking in general about good GFE-FS, versus the extras model, extras-FS, and all the things which make a place a clip joint.
https://sites.google.com/site/sjgportal/
SJG
Anybody Seen My Baby
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BinwuzZVj…
-943,511,465 on banning anything else.