Future of marriage as an institution?
Lone_Wolf
Arizona
In fact, I'm surprised any man will get married nowadays. I know that statics show less and less men are getting married even though the same amount of women want marriage. Smart.
I'm not advocating not having long term relationships. Also, both sides would need protection. It would be more on a contract basis versus outright marriage. I guess pre-nups help.
My question for the team - given the devastation of the almost certain divorce, what is the future of marriage? Will it continue to live on in our culture or morph into something more mutually acceptable?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
48 comments
Latest
But the trends suggest marriage being less popular as time goes by – some reasons reported:
+ young people wanting to get an education; i.e. college + advanced degrees; thus pushing marriage further back in life and maybe not doing at all
+ young people with tens of thousands in college debt and not wanting to get married under a mountain of debt
+ the availability of sex either via hook-ups or P4P w/ the internet making it easy to get the cuchie w/o commitment
In general; young people are waiting longer and IMO the longer people wait the less they may want to take the plunge either b/c they have seen too much shit or decide they can have a better life w/o the commitment of a spouse and kids.
The link below has been posted several times and was originally posted by TUSCLer “sinclair” – it’s an interesting take on relationships:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cO1ifNaNA…
Unfortunately, alot of people get married to the wrong person or are not able to compromise/give-and-take in the relationship. But some people do get married, make it work, and are happy until death do them part. My grandparents were married for 70 years; then again, they were very different then the "ME generation" of today.
Since I am resolutely single I guess that I'm fucked for an especially long life.
Farmerart, if there were stats on the subject, I'd bet regular strip club goers have the longest life expectancy of all, married or not. We have much less stress (high blood pressure, heart attacks, stroke, etc) because most of us get regular sex from strippers.
Married young. Wife was 16 with we strayed dating.
I was going through women like pints of beer when I met wife #2 the Thai. We had a passionate and extremely volatile relationship. My constant coming and goings and extended absences while I made my fortune would drive her as crazy as a crazy Thai woman. I stayed awake many a night for fear she would slit my throat in my sleep.
Then one day she ended up pregnant and I thought I should try settling down. We had a traditional Thai wedding, I built her a house and she popped out her first ‘trophy’ to show off to her family and slutty friends. She never again got upset when I left. Seems that I had made her ‘respectable’ and she became the submissive wife all women are born to be.
That’s what marriage and children can do. Turn a crazy woman into the dream mate. We’ve now got six children and I still come and go as it suits me. Much the same story with wife #3. Wife #1 is a little different but she is French after all so what can you expect.
Just gotta say, not dating has saved me a ton of money on Extra-Strength Tylenol.
My question for any male considering it is simple: WHY?
What possible fucking benefit will you get from entering into a legal obligation like that? If you have a job and are making decent money, it is highly likely that your wife will be the one who benefits from the marriage, not you. If you get divorced, you're fucked, plain and simple. She gets a whole boatload of shit she never earned, you did. She will inherit part of your estate if you die, even though you worked for it. She will benefit from any government benefits you might receive. Why? Who the fuck knows, that's how it is.
The non-working person, usually the wife, benefits from the husband's earnings. YOU get fucking nothing from her.
Again, the question is WHY?? What possible benefit will you receive, to counter the incredible fucking you get if you divorce. And the likelihood of that could be much greater than 50%.
If you're doing it because you think you've got an assurance of great sex and someone who will care for you, you're fucking dreaming. And most married guys can attest to that. YES, there are some exceptions, but the chances that any one guy will be an exception are exceedingly small. Maybe a few percent at best. But the chances of divorce are greater than 50%. Why play insane odds like that?
Women want security, and marriage is their chance at security. They benefit from a binding legal contract. You don't. Marriage is designed for women, not men. Date them, spend years with the one you love, but don't get married. It's fucking insane.
There must be some valid reason. Why did George Clooney just get married? He's like the world's biggest playa. There must be something.
I don't always agree with skibum, but when he's right he's right..,
It's important to:
-Know it's the biggest commitment one can make in life
- Be financially stable BEFORE marrying
- Realize you have to cut down on the things you did before marrying for the sake of your partner
Do these things, and the chances of your marriage lasting will increase greatly
- Make sure you know the person
If a very rich and very pretty lady wanted to marry me, I would still want to hold off until I knew things looked good even though if I got half of several million, that would screw her over based on what we both started with. I guess the common assumption above is the guy has a whole lot more assets than the girl.
It's great you have a good marriage. But to say "I have a good marriage, therefore I recommend the world gets married" is fucking insane.
And for some reason you think FAULT is pertinent to the discussion. It's irrelevant. Apparently you're convinced that men always cause divorce. Fine. What the fuck difference does that make? If you're gonna change men to be perfect husbands, then great. It ain't gonna happen. Men will be men, and women will be women, and no matter who causes it, it's highly likely any marriage will fail. The odds suck.
And to imply that men, who are historically the wage earners, don't get fucked, thru no fault of their own, in a divorce is beyond lunacy. Where do you come up with this shit? I gave clear examples of how men get fucked. We can come up with many more. The fact is that it is rare for both husband and wife to be willing and able and skilled in making a marriage successful, and as a result it's highly likely it will fail. And if a guy like you has been the wage earner for 32 years, and you get a divorce tomorrow, how many years do you have to pay alimony and child support, who gets the house and the car, and on and on. You worked for it, but you lose it. Is that your fault?
Geez dude you can't be serious.
Shark, didn't the institution of marriage start off as business and political ventures? The union of a man and a woman was actually the union of two kingdoms and the like?
Where's this? Scandinavia?
There is also a similar problem in skibum's statement about the poor doing things to remain poor by not marrying. It is possible that this interpretation is correct, but it is also possible that the factors that cause people to be poor are not going to change for most whether they get married or not. Again, I'm not saying that is the case, just that it's all speculation one way or the another, unless someone can cite some statistical evidence across control groups otherwise.
Not so much any more. For instance, in Kentucky, Common Law marriages were disallowed a few years ago.
I don't think marriage is going anywhere, though I believe what we currently think of as marriage will only be a subset of what future generations call it.
It's far too useful as a way to pool resources and rear children effectively to ever go away. Short of a major cultural upheaval everywhere on the planet, that is.
P2: marriage is their chance at security.
P3: They benefit from a binding legal contract. You don't.
Therefore: Marriage is designed for women, not men.
I thought for a while the dude made sense, but then...
LOL
Ummm...is there a point there? Because it sure as hell makes a lot of sense to me. Or are you just doing the standard TUSCL response where you just imply that someone you disagree with is wrong without providing any real information or argument?
yeah, that's it.
Um, no. Historically, in Western society, marriage has more often been about wealth consolidation and political and religious alliances, with women used as nothing more than pawns.
That's been changing *somewhat* in America and some other Western countries, for the last century or two, but in many places, it's still an economic and political alliance vehicle for the benefit of men.
yeah, that's it."
Lol!
Lemme tell you how your conclusion works.
The truth in your conclusion here:
1) Bras, panties, lingerie - I like that.
2) Condoms - I hate that.
3) What else ummm, there's actually no relation to marriage.
SJG