A knee jerk criticism of my posts here is that I make up "bogus statistics".
Now since many of you seem a bit slow here and/or humor impaired let me spell this out for you:
When I say "x% fo strippers have characteristic y" it is my own subjective feeling based on my personal experiences. I try to be as accurate as possible here: I met about 500 strippers in the course of my life so will try to estimate based on this. For example if I thought that 6 of them were worth dating I'd say that about 1-2% of strippers are dateable.
I feel it is important to try and quantify things somewhat, because a statement like "some strippers scam; some do not" is basically worthless: Let's suppose there are 20000 strippers in the country. Then all that is need for the previous statement to be true is for there to one stripper who scams and one who does not. A worthless observation, IMO.
On the other hand, if I post a statement like "exactly x.y% of strippers have characterisitc" then it obviously a joke. Of course I do not have that accurate a measure. Can you imagine how much it would cost to get such an accurate measure and how much of a waste of time it would be? (Then again, if I could get funded to see what % of strippers do extras and what type it might be fun.)
I am making fun of you dumbasses who don't get that it is a joke. But then when I see you take it literally, I really start to wonder about you...
Clue in folks.
Davids: I'm calling them statistics. It doesn't matter if you got them out of a book or, in this case, pulled them out of your ass. When you start talking in percentages you are implying the use of statistics-even if the data doesn't actualy exist. As far as credibility goes. Ha! Who cares? I'm not looking for acceptance any more than you are. I'm just putting in my 2 cents-same as you and every other poster here.