Dear webmaster, I was wondering if it's possible to block an undesirable poster who most people have determined is a masagonist (sp?) and obviously prefers to have his prostate massaged internally from an another angry member while fantasizing about inflicting his destructive energy onto others? What is the protocol for blocking other's posts?
Convince him that bullshit spreads disease. He will spend all day trying to convince his doctor with facts and figures he convinently pulled out of his ass that he needs a course of antibiotics.
Gentleman and Ladies, If you read some of the club chat boards on this site you will see that there are much worse things said about people than what goes on here on the discussion board. If the founder started baning posters it would open up a can of worms that no website administrator would want to deal with.
Bad threads don't push good threads off the board. All it takes to keep a good thread going is good posts. If the thread dies maybe it's rellevance is past.
Just ignore the dickheads and concentrate on the threads that interest you.
Shadowcat said: The founder has made it clear in the past that he does not favor this type of action.
That's unfortunate. The problem is, even if the posts are ignored, which the vast majority are, it pushes the more interesting threads off the board. Why any owner would put up with that is puzzling.
chandler's a total loser: Claims to completely ignore me and my threads but then he posts statistics regarding responses to them, and he knows who is responding and who isn't. Chandler, and others, stop lying to people that you ignore me and then maybe you will have some credibility.
I suppose if someone usually acts like a bratty and annoying 12 year old or a misogynist, it is best to not even read their posts and totally skip over any of their posts. I'll have to try to change my reading habits since I was programmed/taught to read everything back in school like everyone else. I believe the founder didn't want to restrict anything here except the posting of pictures which has already happened.
Someone may find this somewhat ironic but I thought the other day that I was going to have to spend my entire weekend in shadowcat's favorite club's town. Now, I found out yesterday that I don't need to go and am happy about it. I guess it will be a while before I head back to his favorite club.
What I find amusing is posters who claim to not read my posts anymore but then will make comments about them (often with a token razor thin veil) in other threads. Oh, how sneaky of you!
SC: I was hoping to actually make it down to PP to meet you and wish you a happy birthday, but your trips seem to coincide with my work travel... Oh well, you will probably be too busy with your harem to chat anyway.... Enjoy!
I don't really want to get anyone 86'd, hell, I'm lucky that you guys reply to my posts. I just like to let off steam every once in awhile. Yes, I'm sure that the religious right are infuriated by these types of forums. I belonged to a church a couple of years ago and they were all about finding out everyone else's sin and exposing it to the congregation.
JC: my posts are probably still being read by most people here. You can tell when they take their sneaky little passive aggressive shots in other threads. Oh, I am so fooled!
It's spelled "misogynist." It's ironic that davids dislikes the only two people here who still actually read his posts. Founder's anti-censorship, perhaps because this site's probably been dogged by the morally outraged members of the Internet community who don't like the idea of a Web site about strip clubs. I wonder how much hatemail he gets from the religious right about this place.
tropical: Although I not at all fond of JC and his, buddy, parodyman-->, I certainly would not support having them blocked. I think everyone has the right to voice their opinions here: If you don't like them no one forces you to read them. Or take chandler's suggest and write a killfile script so you don't have to see them at all.
What you are doing is trying to force others to conform to your beliefs by having the annoying posters blocked. You want to control what other people can see in order to control their opinions.
Funny that a stripper, of all people should be pro censorship. Kind of like the great irony I find in the heavy handed rule on pink site: the very same place they will whine about meddling politicans trying to pass laws.
22 comments
Latest
Bad threads don't push good threads off the board. All it takes to keep a good thread going is good posts. If the thread dies maybe it's rellevance is past.
Just ignore the dickheads and concentrate on the threads that interest you.
That's unfortunate. The problem is, even if the posts are ignored, which the vast majority are, it pushes the more interesting threads off the board. Why any owner would put up with that is puzzling.
JUST FUCKING IGNORE HIM!
Thank you.
What you are doing is trying to force others to conform to your beliefs by having the annoying posters blocked. You want to control what other people can see in order to control their opinions.
Funny that a stripper, of all people should be pro censorship. Kind of like the great irony I find in the heavy handed rule on pink site: the very same place they will whine about meddling politicans trying to pass laws.