Having sex with a fuck load of dancers in a year for every year or chasing a non extras girls that may take a year or two and a few grand to fuck so maybee a hand full of dancers every few decades ?.....what's the best option in your own opinion ?
whats more inportant ?
comments (10)
Jump to latestWhy are the two mutually exclusive? Nailed plenty of dancers year after year, and then this year finally got a dancer I'd been waiting six years for. Totally worth it, too.
CP
juicebox: " chasing a non extras girls that may take a year or two and a few grand to fuck "
Huh? Why on earth would anyone choose that option. Does. Not. Compute.
Lol...thanks fellas
What CP said. I rotate among a number of dancers in both my road and local clubs, but also have had a few long plays in action at different points. Took me three years to bag one of my local hotties, but it was worth it as she was holy fuck hot and once I hit it the first time repeats were very available. If I did not relocate I'd still be hitting that regularly.
I think it is idiotic to spend a few grand on a girl who does not fuck. I am getting it from three I am rotating for 135-140. 5000 / 140 = 35 or so sessions. Its a no brainer, do the math.
A lot of ROB will string you along "I have to get to know you first" she will say. You want your money to go for pussy and go a long way. Life is fleeting.....Only Dougtard is someone who would pay big bucks for pussy like his Vegas brothels at 1000 a pop. I dont think its bc he high payer, they find him mongoloid repulsive.
Dosent sound like payer11 has a job....a grand ant shit ! And if it is to you then Im sorry your just broke
Sounds like ricks system is alive and well
For me variety is the spice of life


I like the butt load option myself