Who is txtittyfag?
Clackport
Washington
To anyone who cares. I know I said in the past txtittyfag was the member vivi24, but now I'm pretty sure it's not Vivi. Who could it be?
I know Dougster is the obvious guess, but there is a method to Doug's madness and I don't think he would make it obvious, but we all know he has problems with Txtittyfan. Whoever txtittyfag is clearly has problems with Txtittyfan. Who else besides Dougster has had problems with Txtittyfan? I always thought Dougster was pretty entertaining, but he really is a stupid fuck if he is indeed txtittyfag. I hope it isn't true.
Any other guesses?
I know Dougster is the obvious guess, but there is a method to Doug's madness and I don't think he would make it obvious, but we all know he has problems with Txtittyfan. Whoever txtittyfag is clearly has problems with Txtittyfan. Who else besides Dougster has had problems with Txtittyfan? I always thought Dougster was pretty entertaining, but he really is a stupid fuck if he is indeed txtittyfag. I hope it isn't true.
Any other guesses?
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
81 comments
Dougster LOVES beef/flame wars.
Dougster is about the only member I can think of who, out of nowhere, randomly insults a member.
IF IT LOOKS LIKE A DUCK, AND IT SMELLS LIKE A DUCK, WHAT IS IT???
Dinner in China.
Vikings - did I ever randomly insult you for no reason? Nope, because I don't do that. Only continue things people start with me. Just because you didn't see their post which started it don't assume it doesn't exist.
So many people it could be. Hard to narrow it down to just one.
Dougster, I don't have a problem with you, but it makes ALL THE SENSE IN THE WORLD why you probably are txtittyfag. All the signs point towards it being you. And honestly, I'd be very surprised if it wasn't you.
Also how about looking at evidence that txtittyfag and I are difference. Challenge your own hypothesis, don't succumb to "confirmation bias" and only look or facts that support your first instinct and block out those that disagree with them. For example txtittyfag loves to take shot at democrats, where I am predominantly apolitical. That's one to get you started see what else you can find on your own.
Well duh! Who else but a loser troll would be pitiful enough to waste his time on sock puppets?
"Txtittyfag posts some good stuff but we are different people. Not sure who he/she but definitely a clever person who has been around the board for a while."
Propping yourself. How original.
Some more hints. Yes tittyfag and I dislike some of the same people RickyBoy, tittyfuck, VinceMichaels, but tittyfag dislikes alot of the people I like: ranukam, Motorhead, he/she has even taken some shots at the juiceman. Plus tittyfan doesn't seem to have a problem with alutard or the jestie-girl.
I have three candidates I think all have a reasonable chance of being tittyfag, but I know that I don't know.
Everyone here hides behind an alias. End of Discussion.
I've often though he might have had a twin brother Dudester in the distant past. They created quite a stir...ooops, ster, with their flame wars a few years ago. I suspect younger brother Doug may have killed off Dude.
Not 100% of the time.
Would that be the method of saying the same stupid shit over and over for years? If so tx seemed to do a good job of copying that "method", right down to the homophobia and "short treasuries" line.
Dugly pretends he's not a troll and that he doesn't attack people (except for the hundreds of threads where he insults people who haven't even posted in them) the alternate names help him cling to some bullshit notion that he contributes something other than useless repetitive shit.
Dudester's nephew said nothing about a CAR wreck - he said "unfortunate accident". It would not surprise me if Dougster pulled the ladder out from under his younger twin brother, Dudester, while he was cleaning out their mom's gutters in hopes that his younger brother - who mom liked best - would die from the "unfortunate accident".
[On a serious note, nephew reported 15 months ago, and no sign of Dudester since????]
Now, back to the Rickles hour...HELLO...Dougster, that's your cue. Start some shit. Just any ol shit is fine. You can even send it thru your alter-ego, fag boy!!
It's looks like every single person think it's Dougster. I guess I was overthinking it a bit. How could it not be Dougster? He's the only one that would pull that shit. I can't believe I actually defended him through some of the backlash he's gotten.
He is the ultimate fuckhead.
Not everyone. Dalex seems to disagree, staxwell hasn't voiced an opinion so I don't think you should speak on his behalf. Tittyfag and I, of course, disagree. Another error you are making, in addition to confirmation bias, is to base your conclusion on the opinions of a highly non-impartial set of people. I'm surprised you let tittyfag get to you so much!
https://www.tuscl.net/postread.php?PID=1…
"Rankyass > Who is txtittyfag? Who could it be?
It could be yo daddy moron but if it was it sho didn't pass any brain cells along to yo sorry ass!"
I just skimmed it the first time, but looking at it some more there are definitely racist overtones here. I can understand why ranukam would be pissed , especially since no one stood up to condemn it. Ok, then, I'll be the first, at the minimum it was very poor taste, and there is a chance it was intended to be something even worse than that. (And my apologies to ranukam for prop'ing tittyfag after that, didn't realize at first that that was likely the post that got you steaming.)
Also, veteran members correct me if I'm wrong, but I looked at some TUSCL history and it looks like this is not the first time Dougster's did this. I guess most people believed he was the alias Bobbyl (I hope I'm spelling that right) a few years ago.
But enough about this, I've done enough feeding the trolls. I need to hit a strip club up.
"Overwhelming evidence" - riiiiight!
As I say, ranukam is understandably about the post I quoted above, and it seems to be clouding his judgment.
I agree, ranukam, we should all stop feeding his trollish ego. Time is indeed much better spent clubbing.
DingDingDing!
(btw – I know “elementarish†is not a word)
He even hints at it in his post above: "Not 100% of the time."
-50% of the time he's Alucard.
-20% Tittyfag
-30% all other accounts.
Think about it: why would anyone want to create multiple accounts? To piss people off as much as possible, that's why. Why? Because it's the only way he's gonna get support from the "fellowship" in his efforts to get a moderator.
Alucard is king troll. Just look at the reputation he's garnered as of late:
-Racist
-Elitist
-Pedophile
-Dictator
-Supremacist
The guy's a class A sociopath. He's constantly baiting us in to arguments for his own amusement. He finds sick pleasure in "poking the caged bear" by PM'ing members who can't respond since he has them on ignore. I wouldn't be even a little surprised if he created the alias txtittyfag for his own sick amusement, or for his Machiavellian agenda.
Or maybe it's me...
Holy shit, maybe I'm Alucard...
No one knows.
Anyway, so jestie creates "txtittyfan" because he knows everyone will suspect me. Look at the date jestie joined too, it's even before me, so he has reference to all the obscure things txtittyfag brings up, that most people have forgotten. And we all know jestie is so fixated on me, that he'll never forget a word I said either, because he needs it to fuel his endless fire of hatred. Also furthering the argument of "txtittyfag = jester214" is the fact that, as far as I can tell, they only voice disapproval for people, never approval. Has either of them ever propp'ed a single person for instance?
Anyway, good chance it is that txtittyfag = jester214. (Even the politics are the same now that I think about it.)
Only problem I can see with the "txtittyfag =jester214" conjecture is that this "txtittyfag" creation actually seems to have a sense of humor. jestie probably recognizes this is his biggest tell, so just got someone to consult with on "writing style/humor" part. I know RickyBoyDugan (another guy who has never propp'ed anyone - egotist that he is) and jester214 get along fabulously and are constantly sucking each others dicks. Maybe RickyBoy adds the "humor" part to jester214 vitriol to create "txtittyfag". Or maybe RickyBoy and jester214 are two accounts for the same person showing slightly different facets of their underlying twisted "mind" (see how I put that in quotes). Yes, I can see it now, more evidence they are one and the same is how much they both love nutty conspiracy theories. What are the odds there are two distinct people that "out there" with their conspiracy theory non-sense. Must be one and the same!
alucard = jester214 = rickdugan = txtittyfag
Case dismissed!
alucard, jester214, rickdugan and txtittyfag
only "Alucard" has a capital letter in his alias. And we all know that "double secret decoder ring" is part of the "alucard" MO too, so he is obviously trying to convey something by choosing to capitalize the first letter of just one of his four (know so far) aliases...
"What floats in water?"
"A very small rock!"
"A witch!"
"Burn her!"
Anyway, so jestie creates "txtittyfan" because he knows everyone will suspect me. Look at the date jestie joined too, it's even before me, so he has reference to all the obscure things txtittyfag brings up, that most people have forgotten. And we all know jestie is so fixated on me, that he'll never forget a word I said either, because he needs it to fuel his endless fire of hatred. Also furthering the argument of "txtittyfag = jester214" is the fact that, as far as I can tell, they only voice disapproval for people, never approval. Has either of them ever propp'ed a single person for instance?
Anyway, good chance it is that txtittyfag = jester214. (Even the politics are the same now that I think about it.)
Only problem I can see with the "txtittyfag =jester214" conjecture is that this "txtittyfag" creation actually seems to have a sense of humor. jestie probably recognizes this is his biggest tell, so just got someone to consult with on "writing style/humor" part. I know RickyBoyDugan (another guy who has never propp'ed anyone - egotist that he is) and jester214 get along fabulously and are constantly sucking each others dicks. Maybe RickyBoy adds the "humor" part to jester214 vitriol to create "txtittyfag". Or maybe RickyBoy and jester214 are two accounts for the same person showing slightly different facets of their underlying twisted "mind" (see how I put that in quotes). Yes, I can see it now, more evidence they are one and the same is how much they both love nutty conspiracy theories. What are the odds there are two distinct people that "out there" with their conspiracy theory non-sense. Must be one and the same!
Thought about it some more, and I am now convinced beyond all reasonable that
alucard = jester214 = rickdugan = txtittyfag
Case dismissed!
Holy shit! I just noticed that, amongst the four of
alucard, jester214, rickdugan and txtittyfag
only "Alucard" has a capital letter in his alias. And we all know that "double secret decoder ring" is part of the "alucard" MO too, so he is obviously trying to convey something by choosing to capitalize the first letter of just one of his four (know so far) aliases...
PC: I think you are right. First you'll notice that tittyfag posted immediately after Carolynne - there was nobody who posted in between. That is very incriminating all by itself. Almost a slam dunk, but then, just to be extra doubly triply sure tittyfag commented in another thread here about the gulliblity of readers. Cominin these two factors and doing a rigorous statslistical analysis (left as an exercise to the trade) shows that the probability that this so called "carolynne" is the fifth alias of tittyfag/Alucard/RickDugan/jester214 is 131.415296%."
Sorry Good Members, but I feel I need to say this:
You are SO totally Full of Shit with that rambling BS Dougster, I don't know whether to LMFAO at you or to feel sorry for you and your OBVIOUS problems.
Again I apologize for feeding him.
And someone who lives in Vegas saying other people don't have a life. That's a good one! Guess sick liver is just another Vegas alchy whose liver got sick from all stinking he does.
A little searching turns up a long series of exposed or admitted alter egos. Creepy...
Dec. 2008: "Oops, BobbyI just admitted to being Dougster!"
https://www.tuscl.net/postread.php?PID=9…
Aug. 2008: "Who is Bobbyl? I just put it together"
https://www.tuscl.net/postread.php?PID=8…
Apr. 2006: "ClifBar/davids, first of all, stick with a single name"
https://www.tuscl.net/postread.php?PID=2…
You cite some threads from years ago but it's just people speculating akin to current speculations that Carolynne is really a man posing as a woman. Citing hearsay evidence that "someone thought X and Y were same" is hardly any kind of evidence.
I was making fun of the level of "evidence" used to prove these accusations by making up some conspiracy theories of my own in this thread using comparable levels of rigor. Guess everyone missed the point.
Even after I pointed at the scene from witch hunt scene from Holy Grail too.
Do you even know what the definition of psychotic is or do you just enjoy talking out of your ass?
Even if the conjecture you are proposing even was true it would not rise to the level of "psychotic". "Mischief" making probably, histrionic or mildly anti-social at worst.
Deceptive behavior is not "psychotic". It is "anti-social".
I'm not sure why you are confusing things. Deception is something that "psychopaths" do routinely, but, get this, genius, psychopath does not mean "one who is psychotic".
So if you are going to accuse me of things at least get your terminology right, else it just makes you look even dumber than you are!
Shouldn't you be upstairs wearing your mother's dress like Norman Bates?
Fuckin' creep.
These days people accuse Carolynne of being a man without any evidence. RickDugan even said all strippers who posted on here claiming to be women were actually men.
Yeah, so people like to come up with conspiracy theories these days, and your threads show that is now change from a few years ago. That's all you've "proved". Nice try though. :-)
Let's just close this thread now.