discussion comment
3 years ago
who's on first
^^^ @twentyfive that's just mean when you know san_jose_creep hasn't been to first base with a woman since that black stripper at the Market Street Cinema in the 90s. LOL that's the one real world example of him getting to first base with a stripper. It's the foundation of his belief that a front room make out session is the key to dating a stripper.
And icee probably gets to first base often but really how hard is that when she's using drugs to lure a junkie stripper whore into some GFE. Like using prime rib to get a dog to like you. ð
discussion comment
3 years ago
![]()
rickduganVerified and Certifiable Super-Reviewer
My ATF DS and I got high together ITC pretty often. It was never part of a deal or anything, though. We'd just offer it to each other. There would often be other strippers to get a free hit or to share theirs. So glad it's legal up and down the west coast. ð
discussion comment
3 years ago
Who's the better civie woman expert here?
A. RIL PL trick bitch and poser pimp that only knows how to get GFE from junkie stripper whores.
B. Homeless dude that lost his wife and fortunes from excessive clubbing and AMP mongering over 6 years ago and hasn't been with a woman since then.
discussion comment
3 years ago
Gotta love the expert knowledge of women here given by two of the best in the field. ð
discussion comment
3 years ago
LOL so there are differences between civies and strippers.
But also there's similarities.
Got it. ð
discussion comment
3 years ago
^^^LMFAO so they're not all the same according to your own words.
discussion comment
3 years ago
"Stripper grade high heels, makeup, and slut uniforms. The best don't need to be taken off.
A girl this committed to cultivated sex will not be sitting home waiting for the phone to ring.
She will be some sort of stripper, escort, or porn star.
SJG"
^^^This contradicts...
"Anyone knows, women are all the same.
SJG"
discussion comment
3 years ago
If carolynne ever gets her thread going, I wonder if the strippers are going to discuss thought provoking concepts like whether or not PLs vs civie dudes like wearing banana hammocks and cock rings and such because they like having a porn stud aura about them. ðĪ
discussion comment
3 years ago
^^^ You keep contradicting yourself. You posted this earlier:
"Anyone knows, women are all the same.
SJG"
discussion comment
3 years ago
^^^ LMAO icee still can't define what "ethical solicitation" is. ððð
discussion comment
3 years ago
*think otherwise*
discussion comment
3 years ago
@carolynne we all know strippers are like civie women and the premise of this thread is a farce. icee is just creating a strawman argument that there are PLs that don't think this so she can "win" the obvious argument that strippers and civie chicks are one and the same. Again it's a strawman argument because she's assuming PLs think
discussion comment
3 years ago
^^^ meant for twentyfive
discussion comment
3 years ago
^^^ That's precisely why she's obsessed with "dating" strippers. She has to pay them money and drugs for any sort of attention from a woman, and a junkie stripper whore is desperate enough to give her that.
And rather than acknowledge that she's an RIL PL trick bitch, she's desperately trying to equate her "dates" with junkie stripper whores to the same thing as truly dating a civie chick. She couldn't be farther from the truth, but in her delusional mind she thinks it's all the same.
All this is evidence of your point.
discussion comment
3 years ago
^^^ I fully realize that. Just calling it out.
And yeah I think her calling you 20fag is her being extra jealous of your wealth. She's highly materialistic and ties self worth to money. So knowing you as a millionaire is something she's extremely jealous of so she has the most derogatory nickname for you. LOL take it as a compliment. ðĪŠ
discussion comment
3 years ago
It's also interesting that icee lashes out at others for not having an open mind when those same people are simply giving their own experiences from their viewpoint and it's really icee that's being close minded herself because she can't fathom their different perspective. Instead she tries to reverse things and accuse them for being the close minded ones. (When she's just as guilty of it.)
In other words, her attacks at others are simply her projecting her own issues with herself. ðĪŊ
discussion comment
3 years ago
@twentyfive she definitely has self esteem issues. It's evident in the suicide attempt, faux or not.
discussion comment
3 years ago
Funny also how icee pivoted off the topic of what "ethical solicitation" really means and what are specific examples of it.
It's because she has no good answer and was just putting up a strawman argument to rickdugan. It's better for her to redirect the conversation to arguing with twentyfive.
discussion comment
3 years ago
LMAO as if venting about killing yourself over a junkie stripper whore is a normal thing that normal people just do. ððð
It's kinda like thinking it's "normal" to need to use drugs and money to establish a "civie" stripper relationship. ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ
discussion comment
3 years ago
Call it a pet peeve because I really don't like it when anyone suggests a tip excessively. It works against their intent with me. I'll end up tipping less on general principles. And I don't ever reward bad stripper behavior. It just encourages it.
In this situation I would have left her hanging or walked away with her pulling her g-string out the second time. The first time would have been fine. That's strip club stage dancing norm. (Take the tip and then move on to the next guy.)
Continuing to try to milk it with me a second or third time is poor form. I just can't support it.
discussion comment
3 years ago
![]()
crosscheckJust trying to capture the spirit of the thing...
Apparently sexual attraction to a horse is a "thing". I'd have been more surprised by this if I hadn't caught this documentary, "Zoo", on Netflix when it first came out in 2007:
https://m.imdb.com/title/tt0874423/
discussion comment
3 years ago
![]()
san_jose_guymoney was invented for handing to women, but buying dances is a chump's game
"I have very sensitive responsibilities, and they could go in directions I am not used to."
^^^ yeah and you're anonymous on here too. You're known as "san_jose_guy" so it doesn't matter how sensitive your responsibilities are.
You just don't have anything to report on real stripper interactions. We all know this. ð
discussion comment
3 years ago
![]()
san_jose_guymoney was invented for handing to women, but buying dances is a chump's game
Yes, this is online, so you can make all the excuses you want to avoid not having stripper interactions in real life.
And so you can post but not have any action.
All talk, no action. That's all you do here. It has nothing to do with winning approval from anyone. It also has nothing to do with your personal security. You're simply "san_jose_guy" here which means you are anonymous, moron.
You simply don't interact with strippers, ever, and you can't admit it because you'd look stupid, anonymously, for talking like a know-it-all.
You're just a PL poser. All talk. NO ACTION.
discussion comment
3 years ago
![]()
san_jose_guymoney was invented for handing to women, but buying dances is a chump's game
LOL back in 2015 san_jose_creep had no problems posting (ad nauseam) about his escapades and debacles with AMP whores in real life. I'm talking dirty details here.
And now he claims privacy and firewalling off what he does (or doesn't) with strippers?
HORSESHIT!
discussion comment
3 years ago
![]()
san_jose_guymoney was invented for handing to women, but buying dances is a chump's game
It's interesting that san_jose_creep had no issues writing up all this detailed interactions with AMP whores in his real life, but now and over the last 5 years he claims he cannot share any details and he has a faux "wall of privacy" up around them.
LMFAO yet this thread itself has so many details that *should* be enshrouded in privacy. ðĪĢðĪĢðĪĢ