Comments by RandomMember (page 53)

  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    GeneraI
     All your base are belong to us.
    Who'd You Rather: Michelle Obama vs. Elizabeth Warren vs. A jar of mayonnaise
    "And I assume you went to THE ohio state university where you got your magical bachelors of science, which apparently they only give like 6 of those out a year because you fucking bragged about it like it's a Nobel fucking prize." ------ Where's @OSU when you really need him? Don't forget that OSU produces 10s of thousands of nursing students. And they have a great football team!
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    GeneraI
     All your base are belong to us.
    Who'd You Rather: Michelle Obama vs. Elizabeth Warren vs. A jar of mayonnaise
    ^^^ I think it's a mistake to be too abrasive and logical with Teh General. He might put you on ignore.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    Papi_Chulo
    Miami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
    OT: Wow
    Good-looking and not mentally ill (like her husband)
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    GeneraI
     All your base are belong to us.
    Who'd You Rather: Michelle Obama vs. Elizabeth Warren vs. A jar of mayonnaise
    ^^ General has me on ignore, @Dougster (probably you, too). Her was talking about @VH_Kicks.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    GeneraI
     All your base are belong to us.
    Who'd You Rather: Michelle Obama vs. Elizabeth Warren vs. A jar of mayonnaise
    That's right @Dougster -- not even Raquel Welch. Old-age happens to the best of us.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    GeneraI
     All your base are belong to us.
    Who'd You Rather: Michelle Obama vs. Elizabeth Warren vs. A jar of mayonnaise
    Thanks @General - we haven't had a thread with such high-quality content since @Flagooner left. I was reading a good article about Liz Warren the other day. She's from Oklahoma and her father had a heart attack while Liz was a kid. Her mother took a minimum-wage job to support the family. So Liz was from a dirt-poor family and still managed to get a law professorship in Texas. She was originally a pro-business Republican and an expert on bankruptcy law -- but she gradually changed her mind and became pro-consumer after being in the weeds and being immersed in actual bankruptcy cases. As it turns out, many of those in bankruptcy were *not* deadbeats and came from all walks of life. She eventually became a Harvard Law professor based on her publication records and *not* because of the "Pocahontas" affirmative-action nonsense. Compare her life story to Trump's: Trump was born into wealth, he's lazy, unintelligent, a narcissist, and a pathological lair. I think Liz Warren and Hillary were decent looking women in their prime. There's not a single good-looking woman in their 70's -- but of course you know that @General. And you're probably a grotesque, wrinkly-old-mess yourself, General. Thanks for the great thread.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    mark94
    Arizona
    The case against Backpage was bogus
    ^^ I'm stating all the facts as clearly as I can and not trying to "pick a fight." Just disagree with the premise that politicians are pandering for votes. There was almost certainly some trafficking going on Backpage. But taking down the site probably did more harm than good.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    mark94
    Arizona
    The case against Backpage was bogus
    Several different issues: (1) Are the owners of Backpage being prosecuted unfairly with trumped-up charges of aiding trafficking? Possibly, but I don't have much sympathy for those being prosecuted. (2) Does some fraction of Backpage's business involve trafficking? Almost certainly -- but I have no idea how big the fraction is. Either does anyone else on this thread. (3) Did taking Backpage down make it harder to fight trafficking? Almost certainly. The problem migrates to hundreds of other sites making it harder for law enforcement. (4) Did taking down Backpage put consenting adults in more danger? Almost certainly. Forces independent girls back on the streets and under the control of pimps. Painting the whole issue as politicians pandering for votes ignores all the complexity of a difficult topic. "Reason.com" is not as bad as some other publications -- but it's a libertarian rag and definitely has an agenda.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    mark94
    Arizona
    The case against Backpage was bogus
    "And humans are dumb enough to listen to anything that a politician would say" --------------- So you've done extensive research and you're absolutely sure that sex trafficking has never occurred on Backpage? Or are you saying accepting some trafficking is a necessary and acceptable because the government should stay out? Or, just what are you saying?
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    mark94
    Arizona
    The case against Backpage was bogus
    Complicated issue. I have no doubt that some fraction of Backpage's business involved sex trafficking of minors. However, in a practical sense, it also shut down the market for consenting adults. Some of these girls (of legal age) who conducting business without pimps are now pushed into the hands of pimps without a place like Backpage to advertise. So shutting down Backpage may exacerbate the problem overall. A lot of the business from Backpage ended up on SA, and a lot of pimps and johns use SA now. It's obvious from some of the posts here (like @3131's post about getting robbed in his hotel room).
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    ConcernedWhiteLady
    Sally Jesse Raphael is my hero
    Question facing America today: Should we have psychotherapists on hand at strip
    The most talented dancers serve as psychotherapists for all the lonely guys looking for affection.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    sinclair
    Strip Club Nation
    Hustlers Trailer
    @Jack: "They had no social conscience--or any other kind of conscience. " _____________ In a contest for "lack of social conscience" b/w strippers and the Wall Street mortgage securitization chain (circa 2008) I would choose Wall Street, any day. Looks like a good movie. The real-life story behind the movie comes from this article in NY Magazine: https://www.thecut.com/2015/12/robin-hood-strippers-scores-c-v-r.html some excerpts: "Here’s a modern Robin Hood story for you: a few strippers who stole from (mostly) rich, (usually) disgusting, (in their minds) pathetic men and gave to, well, themselves." "The men were mostly assholes. Even when they didn’t start out that way, they’d get drunk and say things like, “Did your father abuse you? Is that why you do this?,” which was unnerving even when it wasn’t true. The majority were married, though that didn’t stop them from asking for things like blow jobs or sex or to be penetrated with a Champagne bottle, a request that they were shocked came from a clean-cut family man." “We had a guy who was — is — at Guggenheim Partners. He spent 300 grand in one week. He came in three times, 100 grand every time he walked in the room. Everyone made $10,000 every time he came in.”
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    sinclair
    Strip Club Nation
    If TUSCL Was Like NASCAR...
    I'll add: @Flagoneer - Del Monte @JohnSmith - Harlequin @Subra - Toyota @Dugan - https://www.aiche.org (although Men's Warehouse is more appropriate) @TxTittyFag - https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/spell-check
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    Got robbed OTC ( SA)
    My first dates are always unpaid, platonic, and in upscale area. If you use SA like Backpage, you're open to what you've described. Glad you're okay and the story makes everyone more cautious
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    crazyjoe
    Colorado
    Who is the most helpful poster on Tuscl
    Private message I got from @SJG: 1 Hour Ago Txtittyfag is Rech. Dougster is not Txtittyfag, but he is RicktheLion and Rickthevulture and Ricktheturtle SJG
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    Papi_Chulo
    Miami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
    OT: The CEOs of nearly 200 companies just said shareholder value is no longer th
    "...but they are not there to be a charity for the less fortunate" ----------------- I didn't say that. That's a strawman. I'm quoting the first line of your thread: "Shareholder value is no longer the main focus of some of America’s top business leaders." The corporate tax windfall was used to buy back company stock. The only purpose of the stock buyback was to increase shareholder value. This was not pennies and dimes; it amounted to 100s of billions of dollars this year alone. That money came at the expense of taxpayers because it increased the deficit. CEOs benefited vastly more than the average shareholder. How can you not possibly see the hypocrisy? To repeat: watch what CEOs do and ignore what they say. The tax cut was unpopular and people who read know the score. The CEO message is basically propaganda to avoid a progressive backlash.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    crazyjoe
    Colorado
    Who is the most helpful poster on Tuscl
    Good points, @Ismael. I've forgotten what it's like to be a beginner and don't travel enough to take advantage of the inside scoop you get in the reviews. I mostly come here to vent about my secret life. It's a kind of therapy.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    crazyjoe
    Colorado
    Who is the most helpful poster on Tuscl
    Actually @Dougster you were one of my favorites before turning into a full-time troll.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    Papi_Chulo
    Miami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
    OT: The CEOs of nearly 200 companies just said shareholder value is no longer th
    "...a good chunk of Americans are indeed shareholders " ____ That "chunk" is about 1/3 of Americans. The stock buybacks help CEOs the most because they are compensated with company stock. Obviously I own stocks like everyone else on TUSCL. Think how patently absurd this article is: the only major piece of legislation under Trump was the corporate tax cut which was predicted to raise the debt and deficit significantly($2T over 10 yrs). Companies used the tax cut to buy back their own stock instead letting the money "trickle down" into business investment and wages. The unsustainable deficit will be used to cut entitlements if Trump is re-elected. The article is bullshit. Watch what CEOs actually do; ignore what they have to say.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    crazyjoe
    Colorado
    Who is the most helpful poster on Tuscl
    Helpful in what sense? Why would anyone need "help" succeeding in a strip club? Seems to me you pay money and half-naked girls pretend to find you interesting. It's really not all that complicated.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    Papi_Chulo
    Miami, FL (or the nearest big-booty club)
    OT: The CEOs of nearly 200 companies just said shareholder value is no longer th
    "That whole thing sounds like a load of bullshit." _______ Ditto. We just had a massive corporate tax cut that went primarily into stock buybacks (not business investment or rising wages) which raises CEO compensation. Most likely these CEOs fear a progressive backlash in 2020.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    Widest age gap - OTC
    ^^^ TUSCL has always been a place where middle-aged guys brag about their prostitutes. I take part in the bragging too but try to bring myself down to reality now and then. There’s no chance I would be dating hot 21-yr-olds at my age. By the time you get to 3-decades of age difference, it’s very uncommon for vanilla dating to take place without an exchange of money. Uncommon but not impossible.
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    Widest age gap - OTC
    By coincidence same topic is being discussed on Reddit https://www.reddit.com/r/sugarlifestyleforum/comments/cso8ik/i_enjoy_getting_attention/
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    Widest age gap - OTC
    "LMFAO you old fucks are pathetic. You think those girls actually find you attractive? The only thing they find attractive is your wrinkly old wallet. " __________________ ...but, but, but,...she loves walking around holding my hand!
  • discussion comment
    5 years ago
    sinclair
    Strip Club Nation
    Drinking While Driving
    In Colorado it's also illegal to have open containers of alcohol in the car -- except in the trunk. I hardly drink. Worst ticket in my lifetime was a 4-point ticket for gazing at Google Maps while driving. Cop said that I was texting, but not so.