Comments by mjx01 (page 5)

I'd stay out of mouse town if I could

review 1 of 1, light on details

fall of democracy

I agree. I see the same thing in PA. There is much more dancer's setting their own agenda than the club setting a common denominator.

depends on what you want. I hate to agree with the troll, but 2001 for scenery, if you don't care about cost or mileage. BAs in Pasco for mileage if you care less about quality but maybe avoid day shift.

14 year member and 166 reviews... yep I'm a chat bot alright $1000 for blue balls in the spaceship... sorry even I can do better than that

her father: Flavio Briatore

you should test drive both

And her mom hasn't turned into a cow... so definitely promising in the genetics lottery

"Now here comes the rub. The ladies for the most part do not work the room. I don't consider myself to be a tightwad but I'm not one to make it rain either." You are preaching to the choir brother!

Couple of comments... I hesitate to say "most" but at least the clubs I am most familiar with charge dancers a house fee to work. Clubs have had to lower their standards to keep the roster full or even expand the roster to keep that part of the business model in the black. The increasing cost and/or decreasing mileage of an entry level / test drive dance makes me less willing to sample and explore. So, that leads to spending less. IDK about y'all... but I've reached a point where if I'm not confident in getting satisfactory mileage I just don't feel like taking the chance. So, that leads to spending less. Dancer attitudes have predominately gone to shit IMO. This probably sounds dumb, but I've developed a pretty firm friendliness threshold. Don't meet it and I don't spend. I probably didn't realize it at the time, even-though I would argue my ATF was a solid 10, it was far more that she was good at being friendly to me than anything else. This also related to the "selling" part of this. "Wanna dance" just doesn't cut it IMO. So, that leads to spending less. The sad irony to this is that if I did find a quality CF (looks + personality + mileage) I'd probably spend myself into the ground with no other competing options.

review 1 of 1

consistent with my impression of this place

My recollection is that: standard cover was $15; Con Tiki is $5 discount, not $5 cover; day shit is 2-for-$25 standard LDs, presumably maybe VIP are 2-for-$50?; hum... Although I do have to agree with: "didn’t feel like I was gonna get robbed like in Spokane" @Rock: mileage is not "exceptional," very one-way, historically friction was decent but been very airy lately

DEI... unless you live in DeSantis world. Heck even my employer cares more about DEI that the actual work we theoretically get paid for. I don't remember the exact quote but... failure to be good students of history doom you to repeat history.

One might think that the 'open' LD room would suck but IME most (keyword) are ok with hands roaming uncovered areas. VIP rooms are a longstanding question mark. The 20 min rooms are very clearly camera up. CCTV feeds are on manager's desk at the check in station... what is or isn't available in the other rooms is unclear at best but I haven't really seen much encouraging news in any recent review in memory.

$20 topless LDs $100/$120 rooms - dancer's choice nude or topless

According to the Internet Adult Film Database (IAFD): The average female porn start enters the industry at 22. And lasts an average of only 3 years. A different analysis found: The most common age for a female porn start is 21 (...MILFs skew the average upwards) with 63% between 20-24 Of course different women peak at different time... but I figure the statistical average is about right over a large enough population

FWIW... I've noticed the increased rudeness in most clubs I visit. IDK but IMO it seems to track with generation. The older veteran dancers seem to understand the dynamics involved where as the younger more entitled dancers seem to lose their minds if you aren't into their fat/ugly-ness. I think it also tracks with the general trend of dancers having more say in setting their own agendas and the club not setting or enforcing some baseline (for various reason).

review 1 of 1 but tells you what you need to know

Everyone is different, but if we were to generalize, 21-25, assuming no baby destruction.

I wish I could but already have other travel plans, and explaining a random tip to the promise land would be a chore. Isn't the October in Oktoberfest a bit of a misnomer? I though the big festivals were actually much earlier, more like September? The lead up to the start of October not actually in October?

Wow, that strayed a bit from the OP. As for clubs, and naked titties and pussies... dancer quality is way down where I live. Just heffers everywhere these days. Somewhere, near the top of the thread, there was a comment about part time / moonlighting dancers. Sadly, I agree, they seem to be a thing of the past. That used to be such a turn on. Some smoking 10 with a 'real' job while secretly being smoking hot stripper on the weekends. Sign me up. Mileage hasn't changed much where I live but definitely more dancer choice and less uniformity with the under 30 crowd.

I have to agree with Ishmael. I encounter TUSCL acronyms in non-TUSCL settings and have to remind myself that the TUSCL version is not the work appropriate version. I had the reverse happen. Once upon a time, long before really getting into TUSCL, I knew (better than acquaintance) this young woman, walked into the local club, and bam there she is on stage full naked. We were both quite surprised. Sadly or luckily nothing more came of it.

Review 1 of 1. Club is hole in wall. Doesn't deserve 7/10. Technically accurate, but my gut feel leans towards ad. Every once in a while I've found a true diamond in the rough here but generally speaking I'm not impressed with the talent here. Dancers who have enough good looks almost certainly will work elsewhere in the area.