discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
JohnTitordon't sweat the petty things-pet the sweaty things
Phoenix
discussion comment
6 years ago
Nope, I understood that Founder could only go with the board consensus. So I waited to see what that consensus was. Yesterday looked like @vinceygirl, but had a pretty good rally for me today. Again if IQ weighted it's a landslide for me.
I said I would go along with TUSCL consensus even when it wasn't looking in my favor. Now that consensus has swung back toward me, I expect my opponents to respect the consensus even if it's not what they themselves want.
discussion comment
6 years ago
Think he can control the board. Thinks he can control his wives (but they disagree and divorce his ass). Bet he loses his best employees because of what a control freak he is.
discussion comment
6 years ago
Whatever, your implication was crystal clear. You thought you could tell me what to do, you couldn't, so you backtracked and pretended like you didn't care to save face. Like I say if you want to control the place like it a business of your then buy founder out. Until then... COPE.
discussion comment
6 years ago
Also got to go to bed in about 3 hours. If you guys don't agree with @BJ99 is the most objective person to trust the decision with come to a consensus by then. Otherwise it's her.
LOL!
discussion comment
6 years ago
@25 Is that you you said why you said why wait until Monday? Leave now. Look, dude, TUSCL is not a business that you own. You don't get to control everything. And especially not other people. Get used to it or buy Founder out.
discussion comment
6 years ago
Just remember @doctorevil at the end of day you are a guy who defends pedophiles. That put a very low upper bound on how credibility I can give to anything you say.
discussion comment
6 years ago
Oh-oh!
Maybe I will have to leave!
Okay, I can live with the decision either way.
discussion comment
6 years ago
@25 and you're changing your own story. You said many times in the last few days that you wanted me to leave. Couldn't happen soon enough for you. Now it's that you don't either way.
discussion comment
6 years ago
@25: gessh... And you used to be so nice to me when you used to always come to me for help with financial advice. After I called you out for defending the pedophile @vincemichaels, you've grown furious, done a 180 and lost all objectivity!
LOL!
discussion comment
6 years ago
Oh, speaking of objective there was @Che but he hasn't posted in a long time. @jester214 said that everyone who around in 2012 thought @txtittyfag was an alias of mine. But the loner dissenter, who was correct was @Che who said I was not the kind of guy who needed to use an alias to go after people I don't like. Kind of a duh! point, but one person (not @jester214) got it.
discussion comment
6 years ago
I predict you'll get to pick. Not seeing a flood of names of people let alone a consensus around anyone that people think is objective.
And I'll be final arbiter of who is most objective, since I'm the objective person on the board.
discussion comment
6 years ago
And, actually, goes without saying, I'm the objective impartial person on this board, but of course, delegating the decision to myself would be kind of silly. So you folks have to pick someone besides me.
Proposals?
discussion comment
6 years ago
Hey, if you guys can think of a more impartial, objective person on this board just let me know. Otherwise, we're going with her.
discussion comment
6 years ago
@anonlvone: then adjust the fee up. Fees work great for preventing spam in other systems. Something I would have expected an IT guy like you to know.
LOL!
discussion comment
6 years ago
@25 you don't seem very confident @BJ99 is going to vote the way you want. LOL!
discussion comment
6 years ago
Charge some small fraction of a bitcoin for every post someone wants to make. You could also work in a credibility system so if the post was judge good by other posters you would get part of your fee back.
LOL!
I think science can fix this problem quite easily.
discussion comment
6 years ago
Sounds like a good idea. But I say 5 months and 7 reviews. Otherwise great suggestion.
discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
flagoonerEverything written by this member is a fact.
@vincemichaels is one sick fuck.
discussion comment
6 years ago
![]()
flagoonerEverything written by this member is a fact.
Exactly.
discussion comment
6 years ago
@real: Ok, have fun with anonlvone.
discussion comment
6 years ago
I have had some great accusations about who my "aliases" have been over the years. This week we seem to had three great new additions: I've been accused of being @rickdugan, @gammanu95, and now @BJ99. @JohnSmith69 was another good one. When "everyone" on TUSCL "knows" beware!
discussion comment
6 years ago
I see, just like how they knew that I was wrong: that the stock market was a bubble, as was Bitcoin. And how RICK was a "dog shit stock" that would crash in a few months from $8.80 to zero. Sorry, but I don't put much faith in what "everyone" on TUSCL "knows".
Besides you aren't addressing the issue of when you admitted that we are different people. Think harder. Can you remember when?
discussion comment
6 years ago
One little problem, though, @jester214. You did admit that txtittyfag and I were different posters at one point. Think hard. Can you remember when it was?
discussion comment
6 years ago
^^^ Bingo!