Comments by Dougster (page 2)

I viciously attacked you? Think you are confusing me with @txtittyfag and @rickdugan. I remember just watching that thread a little speechless. Now I should have attacked then and there for defending a pedophile, but: a) @txtittyfag and @rickdugan said to be doing a good enough job on their own b) I almost never proactively attack anyone here. It's you who started things with me, and I guess you don't like how they turned out as evidence by how furious you are Oh, right. I forgot. You believe that @txtityfag and @rickdugan are just aliases of mine. Guess that's why your a little confused on the matter. But, yeah, didn't viciously attack you, but support those who did.

I also remember another amusing one where you bragged about your percent gains on AMZN (might have been you posting on the board) by taking profits at strategic points. This despite that you do not believe you can time the market. When I look at it though, didn't mention it at the time, you would have done better with just buy and hold.

@25: "I own about 1200 shares of amazon I inherited about 600 of them it's been a real winner the only stock that has made more money for me in the last 10 years has been Home Depot" Okay, I stand corrected. I said you inherited "most" of your wealth, but it's unclear from this if "about" 600 out of 1200 is below or above "most". Let's say you inherited a good chunk of your money.

You'll have to give me a day or two to find the one about how much you inherited. Unless you want to clarify that now and save me the trouble. There's alot of threads from you since you needed alot of help with finance and dealing big bad guys like @mark94 and @anonlvone.

Just posting that amusing one I found first. Patience.

@25: How about this one where you can't seem to be able to deal with @mark94 on your own: Title: Go after mark94 "[blah, blah, blah]" Seems little @25 can't deal with big bad mark on his own and had to come to me for a little help on that one? You'll notice the imperative voice in the title. Again, @25 thinking of TUSCL as business he owns, and other people here as just working for him. Get over it, @25! LOL!

@25: Here's a little management lesson from me to you. Nothing wrong with delegating decisions to others. It's only control freaks (you) who don't and, apparently, are so violently opposed to the very concept. Guess that's why your marriages failed. Multiple times too?

Bottom line folks. @25 is furious because he has run into something he can't control: i.e. me. He is used to control things from owning a business and wish his family life and this board were more like that. You can see how frustrated he gets when it doesn't work out like that. He had oh, such good thing to say about me until I called him out for defending the self-admitted pedophile @vincemichaels. Now he is furious at me, has done a 180 and won't get over it any time soon. (PS: he inherited most of his money from his father. Told me so in PMs. Sounds like his father might have had it together unlike him.)

@25: Love your logic. Yesterday, it was like if I leave I'm a pussy. Today it's like if I stay I'm a pussy. Seems a pattern with you. You decide your conclusion and "reason" backwards instead of starting with facts and reasoning forward. Like I said. If I was a pussy I would defend the self-admitted pedophile @vincemichaels like you do.

Riiight... LOL!

@25: says the guy who kept asking my opinion on cryptocurrencies and stocks. (And I don't think ever did it go the other way.) No problem making my own decisions. And my P&L says I'm pretty damn good at it too. LOL!

@doctorevil: Nope if I was a complete pussy I would defend self-admitted pedophile like you and @25 do. LOL!

@BJ99: Okay, okay. You're right. I should thought more carefully how I would have reacted if other did ask me to stay and how I would have felt leaving @txtittyfag to fight @vincemichaels again by himself. I should have worded it as a question: "Which of Us Would You Prefer to Leave?" or something right that. I'll try to do better in the future. Thank you for the feedback.

@jester: I fully acknowledge that I am predictable. It's what people who are truth oriented are. Yep, you can ask what 2 + 2 is and predict perfectly we'll say 4. People who are circle jerk oriented (like you) are harder to predict. First you have to decide what the circle jerk will decide. Could be anything really, and then you'll know how they think. Since they can't think for themselves. I say predictability is a good thing. The predictability of me falls out of the predictability of the truth.

I'm ready for the decision. I don't see anyone objecting to you being chose as the objective judge (so to speak here).

@jestie: "Now your claiming (with no evidence) " Just go back and read the threads. All the evidence you need there. LOL!

New stance: I'll never leave the board until @vincemichaels does. But subject to change due to feedback from others. LOL!

Wait? Wait? I'm on the right? Skibum says I'm on the left? Did I go so far left I end up back on the right?

@jestie: And just a little critical feedback from me to you. I noticed you call people (not just me) liars are the time. Partly that is just you projecting since we know you spend half your life lying yourself and the other half complaining that others are liars. But one of your cognitive errors seems to be to think if someone makes a statement at one point in time and then a different statement later it means they are a liar. That is just plainly wrong. For example I can say "it's raining" on Monday, and then if I say "it's not raining" on Friday doesn't make me a liar. Along the same lines people are allowed to change their mind as new data comes in. Doesn't mean they lied in the first place. They said what they believed given what they knew at the time, but then information caused them to revise their position. You are always stretching to call people liars though (projection) so you pretend you don't understand that. Well I'm call you out on it here. LOL!

@jester214: I really don't understand why you are freaking out. Other than you are a born spazz and a guy who really doesn't like me. I thought one way on Friday. Waited to see what board consensus was as I said I would. Weighed people words. Both those for and against me. And I revised my original position. Sorry it didn't go the way you wanted. Maybe if you had argued your position more persuasively it would have turned out how you wanted. Might want to consider that in the future, instead of always just bitching and complaining, and being obsessed and blaming me for everything. Grow up a little, dude.

@juice: I like objective girls!

@jestie214: Yeah, what about that? Don't see your point... Obviously, board sentiment isn't strong enough to get @vm removed at this point in time. But sentiment can change over time. @txtittyfag, me, and other will be getting to work on that.

I didn't send any to myself. But, it's kind of funny that you complain about me changing my mind on something due to board consensus. You've always complained that I just do what I want and don't listen to it. So which is it? Again: board consensus was not what you wanted. You are just going to have to get over that. That happens in life some time. COPE!

@doctorevil: ah, but she might have been "j/k". We'll find out soon enough. Back to another topic: So far I haven't heard propose someone who is more objective. Again if you can think of anyone you now have about two hours to decide.

@jester214: DId you miss this part: "TUSCL now needs to choose." Like I said, I listened to consensus. After being initially in favor of @vincemichaels, today it swung strongly back in favor of me. You are just going to have to accept that most of the rest of board does not want what you do. Be a man and live with that.