loki's Playhouse Lounge review
uscue13
California
Don't specifically want to throw more fuel into the problems some people perceive with Playhouse Lounge reviews, but is there some way to take into account a review such as Loki's today? He has left 13 reviews since Sept. 2007 and each review is just a copy and paste of the exact same thing. Split evenly between PL and Grandview club. Looking at the dates of reviews, it seems as just posting something as a way to stay a member that can read reviews every month but the least we can do is make it so you have to actually contribute. I wouldn't consider copying and pasting a generic review that could apply to any club in America as contributing.
14 comments
So if he's not a patron, I can only think of 3 other things:
- Club owner/manager
- Dancer
- Law Enforcement
All 3 would use the site for "research" purposes.
this problem has been eradicated
Have you ever considered "Weighting" a reviewers post by the amount of time as a "Joined Member".
1 month or less = 5% - of posted club score effects the moving club average.
3 month or less = 15%
6 months or less = 25%
1 years = 50%
2 years = 100%
This would mean that members with longevity with the site and most likely with more experience would have a greater impact on club scores. And would diminish the current effect experienced for this club.
Just a Thought
Noun 1. Social Club - a formal association of people with similar interests.
This may not be a Formal Association...but I would at least hope, that you're here because you have a similar interest with all the rest of us. That being Accurate information about Strip Clubs.
MisterGuy: I hope you're right...but it still pisses me off that the PlayHouse is such a highly rated club. The place is a rip joint in my book, which is most likely run by guys reminiscent of the Sapranos.
I dont see it in any Top 10? Was it?
BTW, will this site ever go back to the Top 40 lists? 10 just isn't enough.
Well, it isn't a "highly rated club" anymore...it's only currently a 7.98/10, which wouldn't put it in any of the Top 10 lists. founder already said that he "fixed" the problem that this thread is all about.
As far as it being a ripoff joint, I would agree that the NJ dollar parade that's apparently in full-force there is a real drag, but the club seems to be very "popular" at least within the eastern PA/NJ scene. Almost every region has a club like that...whether it's because of the "extras" that can be had, the decor/reputation, or whatever other criteria that one can imagine.
"BTW, will this site ever go back to the Top 40 lists? 10 just isn't enough."
I firmly agree!
"This club is great. Nice relaxing environment and lovely ladies. Great place to come and unwind or have a bachelor party. The VIP rooms are highly recommended, you definetely [sic] leave with a smile on your face. If you're having a bad day come here and you're sure to leave in a much better mood."
Never mind that the review is recycled .... it's not even INTERESTING. It's so generic and non-specific that it can be applied to almost any club out there. This is the height of TUSCL laziness.
Founder: why even approve such fluff?