Reports are that Joe will open the DNC, but will snub two of the key players in the coup which disenfranchised millions of democrat party primary voters. It would be awesome if Joe went off- script to tell voters what really happened when he was forced to abandon his campaign for a second term. It would be awesome if Joe would tell millions of viewers on live television how the democrat party showed their absolute hatred and disregard for democratic elections by tossing out the primary votes and selecting a candidate without regard for the voters' voices. If Joe had the courage and principal to cite by name Barry, Kammy, and Nancy, and how they betrayed him with backroom scheming to replace him at the top of the ticket. And then, having burned down the doors of the dishonest democrat party, he resigns effective immediately; thus forcing Kammy to become POTUS and severely hampering her ability to continue her dishonest and shameful campaign of lies.
It would be awesome, but Joe does not have the integrity or brain matter to tell the truth and apologize for what the democrat party has become.
Comments
last commentYep, that would be awesome, but it won't happen. We'll have to settle for a landslide defeat of Kamala. Then the Dems can spend the next 4 years crying that America is racist and misogynistic, thus pissing everyone off even more, and paving the way for 8 more years of Republicans.
Log in to vote
Four more years of democrat witchhunts, democrat election deniers, democrat congressional obstruction; but a Trump victory will also bring us fours of economic success for all Americans, mass deportation of illegal aliens, a protected SCOTUS/checks & balances/ separation of powers, Russia/ China/ Iran put back in their corner, restoration of states' rights, and four years closer to making America great again. Who knows, maybe the MSM will pull their heads out of their asses and report the truth with objective analysis (there's the real impossible dream).
Log in to vote
America itself isnt racist. It isn’t systemically racist. But many on the right unfortunately are racist and proudly and openly admit that they dont want certain races and religions entering the country or being practiced. There are many on the right who dont want Atheism, Islam, Buddhism or Hinduism to be practiced. And dont want people affiliated with those religions to be allowed to enter the country.
The left is better at capturing those demographics because of how the right openly talks about not wanting them around. By your own admission orange… you had that banking client you didnt want around but were forced to deal with him.
Many on the right want america to be a Judeo Christian society and not a secular society. With exception; if its an Indian or middle eastern Christian- they dont want them either.
Log in to vote
^^ Ever consider that maybe we just don't want freeloaders or terrorists coming in?
Log in to vote
Of course- nobody does. Its racist and discriminatory to assume someone is a freeloader or terrorist because of their race, religion, gender, nationality… etc.. additionally those things arent done exclusively by any one race or nationality. So race based, religion based discrimination doesnt even weed out freeloaders or terrorists to begin with.
Log in to vote
Thanks Captain Obvious. But maybe a vetting process, like what happens when people apply for LEGAL entry to America might have some small effect.
Log in to vote
Of course a vetting process is fine, problem is, like I said, many on the right, even with a vetting process, simply Dont support freedom of speech/religion. They want to ban certain religions and speech entirely, whether the people involved are citizens or not. Its not just about immigration. Its about restrictions on certain religions, beliefs, speech
Log in to vote
Yeah, I definitely want to ban certain people: assholes like you.
Log in to vote
^100% for the cat #2. Liberals are the enemies of truth and freedom (of speech and much more). Republicans and conservatives are the champions and defenders of truth and freedom. The left just wants power for perpetuity.
Log in to vote
“We'll have to settle for a landslide defeat of Kamala”
—
I wish I could be as confident as you. The progressive exuberance of having a black female candidate seems to be reenergizing the party and Kami keeps denying her past extreme liberalism so I’m scared this cackling looney toon could really be elected
Log in to vote
Puddy, completely false… did you check the anti semitism bill? Had way more right wingers than left wingers backing it
The right and left both have favored groups they want to restrict speech on. For the left its lgbtq and perhaps some minorities. For instance you probably can be legally attacked for calling someone the N word. They could say they felt threatened, and basically get away with attacking someone for saying the N word even if no other threatening language is used alongside it.
The right- wants to make it legal for people to be attacked for using the word untermemsch or any anti israeli/anti jewish speech. You admitted to this yourself.
As far as “middle east more likely” it doesn’t really matter because it doesnt change my point. Many on the right want to totally ban certain religions and speech. Its not just about immigration policy. So when you respond with “middle eastern people are more likely to be violent..” it doesnt debunk anything i said. Many if not most on the right, want many restrictions when it comes to which religions can be practiced and which speech can be used
Log in to vote
^Homosexual bottom.
Log in to vote
Why isn't this mass delusion of a thread in the politics forum?
Log in to vote
Okay Puddy, im not sure why you feel the need to defend “the right” when i even say its many on the right, not all of them.
Numerous right wingers have come out and said they dont think Moslems or atheists should be able to run for office.
Numerous ones believe those religions/beliefs should be banned in addition to banning anyone from countries where those beliefs are popular. To be fair, i havent heard atheism mentioned as much in regards to immigration but regardless.
Weve seen numerous european countries with anti holocaust denial laws, many on the right want the same here. You saw who voted for and against the anti semitism bill. Almost all of the right
You can in fact be legally attacked for using the N word if the person successfully argues they felt threatened. I think it has been considered a “fighting word” in the past. Normally, you can say pretty racist shit to people of any race, but the N word is an exception that it appears you can actually be attacked for. Look at the numerous online videos of people being attacked for saying it, and the perpetrators got away with attacking .
Now again, which “threats you could never follow up on” are you talking about boy? It was you who threatened me. I never threatened anyone, i merely used words you didnt like.
Log in to vote
Oh yeah heres another.
The left wants to ban anyone from wearing a white ghost outfit/the KKK klan robes. The right wants to ban the Moslem Niqab outfit. Both outfits are very similar, one is black one is white. Ironically the left is more likely to engage in anti white racism while the right more likely to be anti black racist.
The left is more liberal when it comes to nudity, whereas the right wants public nudity banned. Because it goes against Judeo Christian values, not because it is actually a moral issue in itself.
Log in to vote
^^ Left also wants dudes to whip it out in the women's locker room.
Log in to vote
@gmd- I did it just to piss off your fat, dickless, liberal ass. Just kidding. I do not know if it was a TUSCL update or a phone update, but I had to restart the discussion so many times I missed the forum selection step.
Log in to vote
“Left also wants dudes to whip it out in the women's locker”
—-
google.com
Log in to vote
Amazing how many right wingers are suddenly concerned about Joe Biden. Wait, where's that laughing emoji?
Log in to vote
Misterorange you may be correct however, the right wants to be able to fuck any immigrant men in the mens locker room
Log in to vote
@motor - "Excuse me, while I whip this out!" Fuckin Mel Brooks is a genius. Can't believe that guy's still alive. 98 y.o.
Log in to vote
@greatergay and punkin head
Log in to vote
Once you see the word "coup" in reference to Biden stepping aside, you know you can immediately disregard anything that follows as pure right wing fantasy.
The closest we've seen to a coup recently was January 6, 2021. Just ask Mike Pence.
Log in to vote
Wah 2,000 peasants almost defeated the entire democratic party, wah. Imagine that the democratic base had to take time off from looting and burning to whine about a successful protest. Life is tough on the dole.
Log in to vote
Why is this a front room post? It would seem to fit better in the politics forum.
Log in to vote
Puddy, probably 75-85%
Running for office is one thing. Over 70% on the right dont think we should have free speech or religion.
Show me some examples of Europe doing that to people critical of Moslem immigrants. And even if that is correct, it just means europe is even more anti free speech than I previously thought.
Yes, threatened is the key word but the point is you can be legally attacked if you say Hey N word to a black person. Because they can say they felt threatened by you saying Hey N word to them. I dont have articles on hand, i just think there have been incidents where they claimed it was a fighting word and akin to threatening physical violence. They felt threatened solely because of the use of the N word, not any other factors.
I never directed those terms at a black person at least not in conversation with you, hence it makes no sense why youre asking me to “go to baltimore and say it”. Yes you arent black or jewish and i directed the term to you, and so? Youve done my work for me. Also, it looks like you are doing my work for me again you are claiming i “made threats” because i said your extremist friend is an untermensch. So by your own admission you dont support free speech, and you believe any racial insult or insult that appears to be racially descriptive in origin, is threatening language.
So you believe the terms untermensch and zoo animal can only apply to some races not any race? That is racism.
You also believe certain races, if those words are said to them, will behave violently in response. That is also racist you are basically saying those races are violent. And thats why so many on the right want different rights and rules dependent on peoples race, religion, sexuality, nationality, and immigrant status. It all comes down to the belief that some orientations, races, religions, nationalities, are better or worse than others.
Log in to vote
Trump supporters don’t deserve action from beautiful strippers.
Log in to vote
^Just another douchebag comment from caca guy. Tell us again about Sky, you haven't bullied her enough lately.
Log in to vote
Serious question.
Is Harris smart enough to be president?
I know I’m not. She won’t talk to the media. Will she debate? Even her own staffers say she won’t read the material they prepare for her. We’ve all seen her word salad performances in the past where she talks in circles and won’t (or can’t) answer questions.
It’s not about race. It’s not about gender. It’s a serious question about her intellect. Which is quite different than the questions we had about Biden and his cognitive decline
Log in to vote
No, I don’t need a “citation” you simply need to examine how many on the right signed the anti semitism bill plus how many want anti holocaust denial laws and even look at i think it was a statue of Virgin Mary, i think someone made one out of animal dung and the religious right wanted it banned.
The entire socialistic support of Israel is literally rooted in religious right wingism. And I know you may claim to be atheist and look for “logical” reasons as to why US taxpayer funds should be given to israel, but at the end of the day an atheist non religious person will always be an outlier on the right so it doesnt matter what your outlier opinions are.
The ghetto zoo animal term was first used for you when you threatened violence, and later used for your friend who got out of prison. So yes it absolutely is related to you and your friends character. Its you who wants to assign those terms to specific races, meanwhile i use those terms to describe people with poor character. Your israeli friend happened to be an extremist with poor character who wanted to wipe out the Middle East.
Log in to vote
The N word argument was literally that the N word itself was considered a “fighting word” and was a threat. It seems to be the one racist term/insulting term that you cant actually legally say towards someone. Even if you dont get attacked, it’s considered hate speech. And if you do, you used a “fighting word” supposedly
Log in to vote
And im not clicking those unknown links boy…
Log in to vote
Trump DOESNT have people skills or judgement to be president? Completely false. He has both decent people skills and judgment. Its part of how he became president
Log in to vote
Puddy, you waste your time arguing with this shithead. He has no friends, no dick, and lives in his grandmother's basement. So he became a troll to amuse himself.
Log in to vote
Puddy, im not sure majority of americans support it and regardless support os much stronger on the right due to religion. In fact even the support on the left is probably coming from the religious left. There are still many Christians of all races who are left wing, and many Jews also.
Nope you threatened violence daring me to come see you in boston.
Yup, utter coincidence lad. The “ghetto zoo animal” is a term I personally created so there is no “traditional usage” for the term. The other term is a german word that can be used to insult any race, in fact even its traditional usage you speak of, it was used to describe anyone inferior, not any one specific racial group or religion or anything else. So yup, no traditional usage, and i invented one of the terms myself personally.
I told you to research fighting words. I dont have to do your work for you
Log in to vote
Speaking of anti-semitisim, but does the left have a problem with Jews? I am sincerely asking this question. Growing up, I have been of the impression that jews overwhelming support dems. Lately, with this Hamas stuff, and this thought line of intersectionality, it seems jews aren't low enough to warrant support -- that and with Josh Shapiro not getting the VP picked when people were reporting it was in the bag. My friends who closely follow politics more than definitely think so.
Log in to vote
Israel kills more gays and more Christians than Hamas does. One of the oldest churches in human history- in Palestine- bombed by israel.
Its ironic, israel is the largest terrorist group in the middle east. They don’t discriminate either- they kill middle eastern people of every race/religion. All the Christians in the middle east hate israel. All the middle eastern Christians who come to the US, likewise hate israel.
American Christians have been brainwashed- but the middle eastern ones, whether Palestinian, Syrian, Egyptian, Lebanese, get bombed by israel regularly.
The Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews are Arabian, not African. Ethopian Jews are separate and are actually discriminated against in Israel, despite being Jewish.
The Berbers were white skinned Arabs. They are literally why countries like Morocco, Algeria, and even a large portion of Egyptians are white skinned and basically look Italian, Greek, etc. anyone telling you Berbers are “brown skinned” has no idea what theyre talking about. A simple read of Berbers on wikipedia would explain otherwise, or, just look up what Moroccan and Algerian people look like. The brown African people in Morocco, Egypt, Algeria, are explicitly NOT Berber people, thats why theyre darker.
Log in to vote
Again there was a Palestinian Christian guy interviewed by Tucker Carlson months back. The guy repeatedly made the point that the biggest problem for Palestinian Christians is Israel, not Hamas.
Israel literally wants to wipe out the middle east and take all the land of its neighbors. As evidenced in the yinon plan which seeks to establish the Biblical greater Israel.
Its funny though because the Bible only promises the land to Abrahams offspring- not Jews specifically. So you can technically interpret those Bible verses to apply to either Jews, Moslems or both. Jews are from Isaac, Moslems from Ishmael.
Greater Israel included basically all of Israels neighboring countries and, i believe even parts of Iraq… hence why Israel constantly creates issues in these countries under the guise of security, in the hopes of eventually stealing additional land.
Log in to vote
^ you didnt even address my points…
Berbers were Arabs who immigrated to Africa. Saying they have African blood is the equivalent of saying White Americans have native american blood
Its a fact that at some point or another, israel has attempted to take additional land from all its neighboring countries. Golan heights.. south lebanon.. parts of egypt. Its no coincidence
Hahahah… you should see what middle eastern Christians say about israel. Just watch that tucker carlson interview for starters…
Log in to vote
Sephardic and Mizrahi Jews are Arab/Persian Jews…
Log in to vote
When you mute the trolls, it looks like Puddy is carroting and attacking himself, LOL.
Log in to vote
I still believe the best policy is to starve the trolls by muting them.
Log in to vote
has anyone else read Kammy's batshit federal price fixing plan? And I thought Obama was a fucking socialist. I mean, he was, but this lady is even more so.
Log in to vote
Even Barry's financial adviser blasted it as a terrible idea with no benefits and lot of possible downsides. It is what I would expect from the most liberal member of congress with the most liberal governor in the nation as a running mate. This is, even more than socializing healthcare, the largest step towards a communist government - controlling peoples' foods. People who have the land, like me, will start growing as much as they can and maybe even some animals. The next logical step is for the government to either tax or take my home production of meat and vegetables since I would not be sharing it nor allowed to sell it at a farmers' market. (Just like the plan for Obamacare was to IRS fine people who did not have healthcare.) If you come for Americans' private property on our private land... we have seen that play out before.
Log in to vote
Lol
Log in to vote