There should be buttons to report reviews like this
Puddy Tat
hiss
https://tuscl.net/review/406554
And fuck anyone who approved this. This level of details about extras is dangerous to the girl and the club.
And fuck anyone who approved this. This level of details about extras is dangerous to the girl and the club.
26 comments
Mickey, it isn't about offending our virgin eyes. It's that this kind of shit is a legal risk to the club and especially a safety risk to the girl.
I would prefer that people reject these types of reviews because they put the club and more importantly the girl at risk of something bad happening when some messed up PL wants the same thing for the same price and gets denied for whatever reason. However, that is just my opinion and each vip member reading the unpublished reviews has to decide for themselves what types of reviews they will or will not approve.
Well, the PL clearly listed what time and day of the week he walked in, she certainly remembers him by face. So either the club or the BF/pimp can take care of this business in person next time the PL walks into the door. Nothing doing a little 'dance in the parking lot'.
Never out a dancer
I tend to agree that reviews should not include explicit details of a private dance if the review clearly identifies the dancer by name or by description. But I try to be a bit more nuanced in applying this standard.
However, your level of outrage is curious. This post is your first ever contribution to the TUSCL board, at least under the user name, PuddyTat69. Have you ever been to BT's? Have you read reviews of BT?. If so, you should be aware that extras are commonly available in some clubs and openly discussed with the dancers. BTs is one of those clubs and there are other clubs in Mexico, Germany, Thailand and in the USA where extras are openly available. I would be shocked if the review in question created any problems for BT's or for the dancer (other than possibly an uptick in demand for the dancer).
The point is that I recommend that you try to understand the unique "culture" of a club before you get too outraged by the level of details included in any review.
That said, now that it's out there, there's not much to do about it. You can post a comment to the review noting that linking dancers by name to extras is widely discouraged here.
You can also message founder, but there's only a small chance he'll pull it down or allow a rewrite.
I don't think there is any harm in simply stating facts, e.g. extras happen in the VIP. But that fact should not be used as a reason for recommending a club because it encourages an illegal activity. A "happy ending" may not be so happy, just ask Robert Kraft.
And, if you think nobody knows what occurs in those clubs, you are likely a guy that gets ripped off at those clubs as a result of naivety.
- written out of anger at no one in particular -
These girls are our providers, not our girlfriends, wives, sisters, daughters, or protectees. As I stated in an earlier post, I imagine she can handle herself just fine in her own, without intervention by boyfriend/pimp/etc.
This hobby is best enjoyed when not getting emotionally caught up with these girls.
Everyone knows what happens at BTs, including LE and customers. Nothing posted here will shed any earth-shattering news.
Beyond the dickishness of it, it’s just bad business. It provides little valuable info while incurring unnecessary risk. Foolish.
The minority may be the most vocal on any given issue, but doesn’t speak to what the majority wants. And in this case, the majority wanted the review published.
On to the next review!
In the club, the dancer has bouncers and staff to protect her.
Outside the club, she can contact cops, or she may have a boyfriend pimp, or a weapon… thats assuming the crazy guy even has her address in the first place, which is unlikely, and even if he somehow got her address, it would be unlikely he would chase her down
This is all in addition to the fact that for most extras dancers, hygiene would be a much bigger concern than how good looking the guy is. Chances are, a guy able to spend $200, $300+ for extras, has good enough hygiene.
dancers who offer extras, are doing so for money. Not because they’re attracted to the guy.
Some PL’s I think get deluded into thinking the dancer is in love with them… and then they assume theyre the only ones receiving extras.. or part of some sort of elite class, top .01% of guys receiving extras
So it makes sense to leave out dancer names because you dont want the dancer or club getting into legal trouble or shut down
But this other scenario some describe is like a 1 in 100 million scenario… which is a mixture of PL delusion, jealousy, possessiveness, immaturity, naivety, etc
I can tell you, whats a lot more common than a PL chasing down a dancer, is regulars and PLs getting jealous and possessive over dancers they like