Do their seem to be way less raids now?
Muddy
USA
BUT if we take a chance to look at and extract the bright side from the situation is that these strip clubs will likely be left a lone and de criminalized. I mean shit everything else is. Also some places don't have enough police to even keep up with 911 calls let alone stake out a strip club to watch for illicit hand jobs. My question to you, is that if you live in or near the jurisdiction of these District Attorneys, have you even heard of a strip club raid during their reign, in their jurisdiction recently? I haven't personally but hey I could've missed something.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
24 comments
Latest
From what I understand, however, this may have been the result of a tip from a disgruntled dancer, and not necessarily a government-initiated investigation.
I do agree that such policies may ultimately lead to legalization of certain activities.
But in today's woke/defund-police climate I would not be surprised if cops are a lot less proactive w.r.t. their job in order to avoid the lefty-woke-mafia from making their lives/job a living-hell.
There have been laws proposed to decriminalize sex work in several regions. None have passed yet, but they likely will at some point. It's not the incredibly taboo thing that it used to be. I think that LE in most areas are content to keep it contained, knowing that it will never go away.
I think that most raids happen in response to the club doing something incredibly stupid or being on the periphery of something far more serious than extras.
The last time Providence really cracked down on the clubs was when it came out that a runaway 15 year old was working at the only-extras club Cheaters (now closed, thankfully). There was a minor crackdown after a Foxy Lady dancer went to the cops to report that she was sexually assaulted in VIP. So, around here raids only seem to occur when LE wants to remind the clubs to stay out of the news.
But really, I think it's because there's less pearl-clutching and therefore less public pressure on the cops.
They may be lefty and Soros backed but make no mistake their actions will still be about grabbing the public’s impulses to a headline, mostly lefty impulses. Women naked for men in a bar, much less giving cbjs? Be sure that can gain public(lefty or not) headlines->impulse. Bob Kraft is worth several billion and would go to an AMP for a rub and tug. Seriously, who cares…but it made great headlines when they found out he was there.
Yep. The right hates any type of SC, the left hates any type of SC that has straight men with naked women. Funny but true. And For each respective view, being able to bust a place that produces headlines of “human trafficking, prostitution, drugs” is clickbait sugar for a public that has a sweet tooth for instant “these! are! terrible! people!” reactions.
Some things are just not about politics, or at least there are different reasons in each camp to arrive at the same conclusions.
I don't think people know how true this is. Media very much pushes the passive/not so passive narrative that what a male has and a female doesn't have, that is because she's been treated unfair. Fortunately not all females have fallen for it but a lot have. And that entire narrative is based largely on evoking a purely visceral emotional response = "it's unfair!". That segues to the nature of and why clickbait headlines are so successful. "Strip Club busted!"(cue the mental image of a naked female dancing for a male) --> incoming pure visceral, emotional, "it's unfair!" response. While these kind of responses are absolutely most certainly not limited to females, in general there is a higher propensity for a visceral emotional response from the female population. Add these together and it's naive to think that a period of less headline making SC busts means "authorities" are backing off, decided to overlook it. Not a chance, the ability to grab headlines, get emotional response, get funding-name recognition-more political power is a certainty to happen/continue.