Found out how Hillary wants to fix Health Care and the mortgage mess
Hillary fixes:
Garnish your wages to pay for Universal Health Care, - if you thought you couldn't pay for health care before, don't worry about it, now you'll have to worry about not having enough money to buy your food but at least you'll be able to visit a doctor after you pay the regular co-pay fee. But hey, you might get $20 off the regular doctor visit fee even if you are starving to death. If you already have health care, hey, you make too much money under the Hillary plan, plan on paying extra taxes to help everyone else.
Mortgage mess fix - She'll just freeze interest rates in the US. Forget all the foreign investors who have been financing our national debt and investing in our economy. They'll just take whatever they can back away before Hillary freezes all funds and stock market trading. Then if you still have a job, the interest rate won't go up. Gas might be rationed or $20 a gallon but hey, the people who didn't bother to get fixed rates when rates were low will get to enjoy new fixed rates.
So far these are the only 2 fixes I've heard her details for. I heard she has a lot of things she wants to fix.
I really think she should discuss her ideas with someone who knows economics before she goes spouting off. Well I guess she believes some people might be better off automatically getting a reduction in their take home pay if they get something out of it. I disagree.
Garnish your wages to pay for Universal Health Care, - if you thought you couldn't pay for health care before, don't worry about it, now you'll have to worry about not having enough money to buy your food but at least you'll be able to visit a doctor after you pay the regular co-pay fee. But hey, you might get $20 off the regular doctor visit fee even if you are starving to death. If you already have health care, hey, you make too much money under the Hillary plan, plan on paying extra taxes to help everyone else.
Mortgage mess fix - She'll just freeze interest rates in the US. Forget all the foreign investors who have been financing our national debt and investing in our economy. They'll just take whatever they can back away before Hillary freezes all funds and stock market trading. Then if you still have a job, the interest rate won't go up. Gas might be rationed or $20 a gallon but hey, the people who didn't bother to get fixed rates when rates were low will get to enjoy new fixed rates.
So far these are the only 2 fixes I've heard her details for. I heard she has a lot of things she wants to fix.
I really think she should discuss her ideas with someone who knows economics before she goes spouting off. Well I guess she believes some people might be better off automatically getting a reduction in their take home pay if they get something out of it. I disagree.
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
16 comments
Hillary "It takes a Village" Clinton is a true socialist and socialists have all sorts of supposed solutions to various problems - she invariably believes govt is the solution, and these solutions in the past have often ended up as disasters in practice. Socialism is very good at doing one thing: dividing up all the poverty it creates, in part by demotivating the otherwise most productive members of society when they begin to understand the majority of their earnings will go to income redistribution.
The top half of income tax filers in the USA are currently paying 94% of fed income taxes, not enough for Hillary and her socialist friends.
Didn't know you were a millionaire casualguy...congrats on that. Give me a break...do you even *have* health care coverage now? If the answer is yes, then don't worry about Hillary. Besides...all you guys long to have a woman dominate you anyways...lol...
"before Hillary freezes all funds and stock market trading."
Ummmm...no one is planning on doing this BTW.
"Everybody else will be required to pay into Hillary's plan it appears."
Wrong again. Where the heck are you getting your info BTW?
If I retire 20 or 30 years from now if inflation takes off, I may need to be a millionaire by that time to be able to retire. Then with Hillary's plans, I won't be able to afford retirement very easily because I would be rich if someone later fixes the systems so that it's not indexed for inflation. Again I'm ranting about plans I think she would like to implement even though I'm haven't heard that many details. I guess I'm of the opinion that she and Obama and even McCain may have some similiar plans so we probably won't be able to retire unless we somehow become multi-millionaires. Excluding those guys on here who are already retired or close to it. I'm talking at least 20 to 30 years away. Ahhh, probably pointless to argue about though, I read a quote that she tried to get this health plan through Congress for 8 years already without any luck. Now she wants to do it all over again. That's what I heard.
In different news, I wonder if she would have male interns working privately in the White House while Bill is out visiting strip clubs. Nahh, Bill Clinton probably would find some other Monicas around I think.
There will never be a flat tax, because it's not a fair way to tax people...great deal for the rich, not so much for anyone else. Progressive taxation is taxation based on one's ability to pay."
You missed the point of my post. I want to know why it's considered fair to tax me at a higher rate based on the extra risks I take to get a high return (higher income) and exercised my brain to get out of a "McJob" flipping burgers and made enough money to be able to stop 'working' and be able to become an investor. "Progressive taxation" is just an attempt to make income redistribution sound less like take the money worked hard for and took high risks to make and giving it to some unmarried broad who knows that the more illegitimate brats she turns out the more money she gets every month that's stolen out of my pocket.
There is nothing fair about anything other than a flat tax. Actually, it would more "fair" to be the opposite of the current system since the 'rich' use way less government services than the lowest income people do. If you change to a pay-for-service-used model you then have a fair system, anything else is communism (and Hillary's nanny-state, which is even worse).