Why Afghans Don't Need Stripclubs . . .
"Nevertheless the military voices on the show had their winning moments, sounding like old-fashioned relativists, whose basic mission in life was to counter ethnocentrism and disarm those possessed by a strident sense of group superiority. Ms. McFate stressed her success at getting American soldiers to stop making moral judgments about a local Afghan cultural practice in which older men go off with younger boys on 'love Thursdays' and do some 'hanky-panky.' 'Stop imposing your values on others,' was the message for the American soldiers. She was way beyond 'don't ask, don't tell,' and I found it heartwarming."
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/27/opinio…
I read about the supposed preference for young boys before, but I just found it amusing the military had according to the article employed an anthropolgist to preach moral relativism to the troops. Good job U.S. military. :)
It also explains perhaps why Afghanistan doesn't have any stripclubs listed at TUSCL. ;) IOWs, who needs hot young women when young boys who probably don't get paid are available? ;)
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/27/opinio…
I read about the supposed preference for young boys before, but I just found it amusing the military had according to the article employed an anthropolgist to preach moral relativism to the troops. Good job U.S. military. :)
It also explains perhaps why Afghanistan doesn't have any stripclubs listed at TUSCL. ;) IOWs, who needs hot young women when young boys who probably don't get paid are available? ;)
Got something to say?
Start your own discussion
12 comments
I thought the Taliban approved of young boys (at least those with facial hair). :) Of course, I could be mistaken or this the following link may just be phony baloney American anti-Taliban propaganda:
Boys of the Taliban
By Jamie Glazov
"But there is a curious rule that the Western media has typically ignored. Rule No. 19 instructs that Taliban fighters must not take young boys without facial hair into their private quarters."
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Rea…
Actually, I think the Taliban approved of young boys as long as the boys DID NOT have facial hair. IOWs, there has been a serious misinterpretation of the all important Rule No. 19. Actually, I think it is Rule No. 3 depending on the particular governing Taliban authority. ;)
http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/Rea…
Like I said, I don't know if there is any truth to this in the least. A true truism is about repeating a lie often enough it becomes accepted as the truth.
A boy for pleasure.
A melon for ecstacy.
I am not making this up.
Yes, they even made a novel out of the proverb. http://www.trashfiction.co.uk/melon_ecst… YIKES!!! :)
I guess maybe there is a way for me to be free of stripclubs. It sounds so weird. It probably provides better pillow talk, as well.
I don't really find it disgusting that others might partake in that manner -- plenty of folks are just grossed out right at the outset, by the IDEA of having sex with a pre-pubescent boy, as though the ADULT is doing something gross. I do find it kind of weird that a young person would be taken advantage of. A little guy who's not old enough to figure out adults or fend for himself, who then is expected to acquiesce to an adult interest in an adult liason? Sounds to me like he's being taken advantage of. Kind of like a school principal demanding that his students make money for him. Weird. What kind of adult is into that sort of thing?
For me, the "natural" instinct is for young-looking women. I don't really enjoy the company of 15-year-old girls, they're kind of boring. Talk about Britney Spears can only go so far. And I don't really enjoy the bodies of 45-year-old women, they're kind of saggy. Somewhere in between is the ideal. Either way, it's the females I'm interested in. I don't get how a heterosexual male would be interested in a partner who's not female.
Can someone explain that to me?
Seems weird in the extreme. One positive is that there was a lot of love in his family----too much actually in that I think they definitely could have done without having sex with young boys.
The key word is *most*. I don't know what most gay men are really after concerning sex. I do know that some gay men, or at least they think or claim to be gay, not only like other adult males, but like young boys as well.
Heck, I even knew a gay male, deceased, who started out liking females. But, he developed an extreme fear of females. Anyway, almost all of his lovers were male. He was attracted to females more than males, but didn't think they could be trusted. He had developed a "close" relationship with his secretary and she was sweet and hot. He wanted marriage and a family with her, but was just too afraid. He knew males would treat him right. It was the females who weren't trust worthy. He even thought about paying a woman to have his children, but again fear ruled. He thought she'd use the courts to deprive him of seeing his children or that he end up in a financially draining legal battles. He told me bottom line he would rather have a traditional family and that maybe that meant he wasn't really gay even though he thought he was gay.
Yeah, but the likelihood of a gay man wanting to screw an under-age person (and being willing to actually take action to bring this crime to fruition) is probably about equal to the equivalent likelihood of a STRAIGHT man wanting to screw an under-age person.
Gay-ness doesn't correlate with pedophilia. That was my point.