I had the same experience with Gia. It happened once and I thought I was paying more attention to the bump and grind so I let it go. Next time, I counted and confirmed her lack of math skills.
I have had the same miscount experience at the Boardroom Cabaret (and other venues) as mentioned above. I definitely consider "the dancer upcharge factor" in who stays in my rotation, but when someone offers "keeper" skills - I effort a way to mutually stay accountable in our future interactions. Certain dancers (that I engage with) I'll request a certain amount of dances in advance to reduce the miscount possibilities. Others, I'll suggest that they ask me if I want another dance with the specific number of dance performance that we will be engaging in. Then there are some with a minor "hustle factor" (like former starlet Katelyn) that aren't/weren't worth the engagement. The Cadillac Lounge has been dead to me for 15 years for a much larger "gouging" issue than any found locally! While I thank Loper for the post, I am wondering if this is his "note to self" reference before future entries to the Performance Arts Center in Brockton!
The go/no go list is a "keeper"! I may disagree with the list, but it certainly has merit. And in keeping with the principles constantly referenced on TUSCL, Loper's not talking about extras in the no touch state of Massachusetts!
Jasmine still cheats the first dance by starting in the middle of whatever's playing! The interaction isn't bad otherwise. It's correctable, or I'm reupping her membership of the Loper No Go "Boardroom" Team. The dances I received from Honey the other day (air dance) have me nominating her for No Go status under the song title Honey (Don't)!
Comments
last commentIn both cases he's slandering them.
ROBs deserve to be named and shamed.
god, icee, you're amazing